Pattern Group Inc. (PTRN) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Pattern

NASDAQ: PTRN

$22.26 ▼ -1.23 (-5.24%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap4.15 Bn

P/E-27.80

P/S1.55

Div. Yield0.00

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)43.18

Add ratio to table…

About

Pattern is a global ecommerce acceleration platform that helps consumer brands sell products on global ecommerce marketplaces. It operates across more than 70 marketplaces to increase product sales to consumers in more than 100 countries. The company leverages more than 66,000,000,000,000 data points and applies machine learning and artificial intelligence to optimize advertising, content, pricing, forecasting and customer service. By combining proprietary technology with a global team of on demand experts, Pattern provides end to end support for brands seeking to scale their presence on various major marketplaces. The company’s efforts are focused on increasing product sales for its brand partners.

Pattern generates the majority of its revenue by purchasing inventory from brand partners and selling those products to consumers on the same marketplaces, capturing the margin between purchase and sale prices. In addition to product sales, the firm offers supplementary solutions such as a first party accelerator, software as a service tools, fulfillment services and consulting, which generate fees from brand partners. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 89% of revenue came from existing brand partners and more than 53% of revenue was derived from partners that have collaborated for longer than five years. The company reported a net revenue retention rate of 124% for the same period, indicating that revenue from existing partners grew despite any churn. These revenue streams are supported by a global footprint that spans the Americas, Europe, Australia and Asia.

Pattern competes with brands that manage ecommerce operations internally, with technology and service providers that offer point solutions for advertising, content, logistics, or analytics, with marketplaces that provide first party selling models, and with other ecommerce accelerators that deliver integrated technology and operational support. The company’s competitive advantages include a win win partnership model that aligns its revenue with brand partner success, a proprietary data set exceeding 66,000,000,000,000 points that fuels its machine learning algorithms, and a global scale that enables efficient data collection and logistics. Its early entry into the market gave it a first mover advantage, allowing the accumulation of extensive operational expertise and a deep network of long term brand partner relationships. Pattern also cites its proven leadership team, a culture of innovation, and a flywheel effect where scale improves data, which in turn enhances optimization and attracts additional partners. The firm points to the broader market opportunity, noting that global ecommerce sales are estimated at about 4,000,000,000,000 dollars and are projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 9.5% from 2026 to 2030. This large and expanding market provides a favorable backdrop for Pattern’s growth strategies, which include deepening relationships with current partners, adding new brand partners, enhancing its platform, and pursuing selective acquisitions.

Pattern works with more than 200 brand partners spanning categories such as health and wellness, beauty and personal care, home and lifestyle, pet, sports and outdoors, and consumer electronics. The firm does not disclose individual partner names in its filing, but notes that over half of its revenue comes from partners that have collaborated for more than five years. These partners are located across the Americas, Europe, Australia and Asia, reflecting the company’s global operational footprint. By serving a diverse set of brands, Pattern benefits from varied demand cycles and the ability to cross sell complementary products across categories. The long term nature of many relationships contributes to predictable revenue streams and supports the company’s emphasis on retention and expansion.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Pattern Group exhibits strong underlying fundamentals that suggest the market is underestimating the durability and scalability of its business model, particularly as evidenced by the record 127% Net Revenue Retention in Q1. This metric, which exceeded the prior year’s 115% and signals expansion within existing accounts, indicates deepening relationships with brand partners and successful cross-sell and upsell execution beyond mere logo retention. The company’s ability to drive such high NRR stems from its integrated platform approach, where technology-driven optimization—responsible for approximately three-fourths of Q1 growth—simultaneously improves conversion, traffic, and availability across marketplaces. This creates compounding efficiencies that are difficult for competitors to replicate, especially as the company leverages its scale across 70+ global marketplaces and over 77 trillion data points to refine its AI-native intelligence layer. Furthermore, the company’s stated long-term NRR target of 115% is now projected to be exceeded by the full-year 2026 estimate of approximately 119%, suggesting that current performance is not a transient spike but a sustainable trend rooted in structural advantages. The absence of customer concentration risk, combined with a diversified brand partner base and the contractual ability to pass through logistics cost increases (such as marketplace fuel surcharges), provides insulation against macroeconomic volatility. These factors collectively support a thesis that the market is overlooking the self-reinforcing nature of Pattern’s model, where success with existing partners fuels further investment in technology and infrastructure, thereby lowering friction for future onboarding and expansion.
The company’s strategic investments in proprietary AI and automation technologies represent underappreciated long-term value drivers that are not fully reflected in current valuations. The recent award of U.S. Patent No. 12,626,273 B2 for True Return on Advertisement Sales Value (True ROAS®) addresses a critical inefficiency in digital advertising measurement by accounting for both short-term and long-term incrementality, enabling brands to optimize spend based on actual causal impact rather than superficial correlations. This innovation, when combined with Pattern’s existing AI adtech platform Destiny, creates a self-reinforcing flywheel: smarter measurement leads to smarter spend, which drives durable organic ranking and reduces dependency on paid ads over time. Additionally, the launch of Pattern Intelligence (Pi)—an autonomous ecommerce execution engine built on over 13 years of operational data and 41 patents issued or pending—further strengthens the company’s technological moat. Pi operates 24/7, taking millions of automated actions such as pricing adjustments, content fixes, and featured offer recoveries, while surfacing strategic recommendations for human review when needed. These systems are not incremental improvements but foundational shifts that position Pattern as a central nervous system for brand performance across complex, fragmented ecommerce ecosystems. As agentic shopping and LLM-driven discovery evolve, the ability to act in real time based on deep behavioral and contextual data becomes a decisive competitive advantage. The market may be treating these as line-item R&D expenses rather than recognizing them as proprietary, scalable assets with high barriers to imitation and direct monetization potential through improved client outcomes and retention.
Pattern’s geographic and channel diversification strategy is progressing faster than anticipated, with international revenue growing 101% year over year and non-Amazon revenue surging 119%, both significantly outpacing the 38% growth in Amazon sales. This shift is not merely tactical but reflects a structural realignment of where consumer spending is headed, as management explicitly noted that their long-term goal is to mirror evolving online spending patterns across platforms. The strength in TikTok Shop—where over 100 brands were launched via 365,000 creators—and the recognition as TikTok Shop’s Strategic Partner of the Year underscore early-mover advantages in social commerce, a channel still in its relative infancy but growing at triple-digit rates. Similarly, expansion into Walmart and Coupang demonstrates success in capturing regional ecommerce leadership beyond the U.S. market. Importantly, this diversification is occurring without sacrificing core performance, as Amazon remains a healthy and growing component of the mix. The company’s ability to maintain high growth rates while expanding into new channels suggests that its platform is genuinely adaptable and not overly reliant on any single marketplace’s algorithms or policies. Furthermore, the improvement in same-day/one-day delivery penetration—from 52% to 57% of total clicks—coupled with the stark conversion differential (18% vs. 9% for slower options) highlights the tangible ROI of logistics investments. These operational enhancements are not cost centers but revenue amplifiers, particularly as they compound with AI-driven availability and pricing optimizations. The market may be underestimating how these geographic, channel, and logistical advancements collectively reduce dependency on any single point of failure while increasing the addressable market for the company’s services.
The company’s robust financial profile, characterized by a strong balance sheet and accelerating free cash flow generation, provides substantial dry powder for continued investment and strategic flexibility that the market is not adequately pricing in. Pattern ended Q1 with $344 million in cash and cash equivalents, zero debt, and a $150 million revolving credit facility, creating a fortress-like balance sheet in an environment where many peers face leverage constraints. Trailing twelve-month operating cash flow reached $124 million, with free cash flow of $99 million, demonstrating that the business is not only growing but doing so in a way that generates real, usable cash. This financial strength enables the company to sustain R&D investment that is explicitly expected to “outpace revenue growth,” as stated by the CFO, without jeopardizing liquidity or forcing difficult trade-offs. The recent capital allocation toward the East Coast facility ramp and the Accelerate conference, while creating near-term margin variability, are strategic investments in infrastructure and community-building that should yield long-term returns through improved service capacity and deeper brand relationships. Moreover, the company’s ability to fund these initiatives internally—without dilution or debt—preserves optionality for future acquisitions, strategic partnerships, or accelerated shareholder returns. The market may be focusing too narrowly on quarterly EPS volatility driven by timing of expenses, rather than recognizing that the underlying cash generation and balance sheet strength support a multi-year investment thesis where short-term expenses are precursors to long-term competitive advantage and margin expansion.

Pattern Group exhibits strong underlying fundamentals that suggest the market is underestimating the durability and scalability of its business model, particularly as evidenced by the record 127% Net Revenue Retention in Q1. This metric, which exceeded the prior year’s 115% and signals expansion within existing accounts, indicates deepening relationships with brand partners and successful cross-sell and upsell execution beyond mere logo retention. The company’s ability to drive such high NRR stems from its integrated platform approach, where technology-driven optimization—responsible for approximately three-fourths of Q1 growth—simultaneously improves conversion, traffic, and availability across marketplaces. This creates compounding efficiencies that are difficult for competitors to replicate, especially as the company leverages its scale across 70+ global marketplaces and over 77 trillion data points to refine its AI-native intelligence layer. Furthermore, the company’s stated long-term NRR target of 115% is now projected to be exceeded by the full-year 2026 estimate of approximately 119%, suggesting that current performance is not a transient spike but a sustainable trend rooted in structural advantages. The absence of customer concentration risk, combined with a diversified brand partner base and the contractual ability to pass through logistics cost increases (such as marketplace fuel surcharges), provides insulation against macroeconomic volatility. These factors collectively support a thesis that the market is overlooking the self-reinforcing nature of Pattern’s model, where success with existing partners fuels further investment in technology and infrastructure, thereby lowering friction for future onboarding and expansion.
The company’s strategic investments in proprietary AI and automation technologies represent underappreciated long-term value drivers that are not fully reflected in current valuations. The recent award of U.S. Patent No. 12,626,273 B2 for True Return on Advertisement Sales Value (True ROAS®) addresses a critical inefficiency in digital advertising measurement by accounting for both short-term and long-term incrementality, enabling brands to optimize spend based on actual causal impact rather than superficial correlations. This innovation, when combined with Pattern’s existing AI adtech platform Destiny, creates a self-reinforcing flywheel: smarter measurement leads to smarter spend, which drives durable organic ranking and reduces dependency on paid ads over time. Additionally, the launch of Pattern Intelligence (Pi)—an autonomous ecommerce execution engine built on over 13 years of operational data and 41 patents issued or pending—further strengthens the company’s technological moat. Pi operates 24/7, taking millions of automated actions such as pricing adjustments, content fixes, and featured offer recoveries, while surfacing strategic recommendations for human review when needed. These systems are not incremental improvements but foundational shifts that position Pattern as a central nervous system for brand performance across complex, fragmented ecommerce ecosystems. As agentic shopping and LLM-driven discovery evolve, the ability to act in real time based on deep behavioral and contextual data becomes a decisive competitive advantage. The market may be treating these as line-item R&D expenses rather than recognizing them as proprietary, scalable assets with high barriers to imitation and direct monetization potential through improved client outcomes and retention.
Pattern’s geographic and channel diversification strategy is progressing faster than anticipated, with international revenue growing 101% year over year and non-Amazon revenue surging 119%, both significantly outpacing the 38% growth in Amazon sales. This shift is not merely tactical but reflects a structural realignment of where consumer spending is headed, as management explicitly noted that their long-term goal is to mirror evolving online spending patterns across platforms. The strength in TikTok Shop—where over 100 brands were launched via 365,000 creators—and the recognition as TikTok Shop’s Strategic Partner of the Year underscore early-mover advantages in social commerce, a channel still in its relative infancy but growing at triple-digit rates. Similarly, expansion into Walmart and Coupang demonstrates success in capturing regional ecommerce leadership beyond the U.S. market. Importantly, this diversification is occurring without sacrificing core performance, as Amazon remains a healthy and growing component of the mix. The company’s ability to maintain high growth rates while expanding into new channels suggests that its platform is genuinely adaptable and not overly reliant on any single marketplace’s algorithms or policies. Furthermore, the improvement in same-day/one-day delivery penetration—from 52% to 57% of total clicks—coupled with the stark conversion differential (18% vs. 9% for slower options) highlights the tangible ROI of logistics investments. These operational enhancements are not cost centers but revenue amplifiers, particularly as they compound with AI-driven availability and pricing optimizations. The market may be underestimating how these geographic, channel, and logistical advancements collectively reduce dependency on any single point of failure while increasing the addressable market for the company’s services.
The company’s robust financial profile, characterized by a strong balance sheet and accelerating free cash flow generation, provides substantial dry powder for continued investment and strategic flexibility that the market is not adequately pricing in. Pattern ended Q1 with $344 million in cash and cash equivalents, zero debt, and a $150 million revolving credit facility, creating a fortress-like balance sheet in an environment where many peers face leverage constraints. Trailing twelve-month operating cash flow reached $124 million, with free cash flow of $99 million, demonstrating that the business is not only growing but doing so in a way that generates real, usable cash. This financial strength enables the company to sustain R&D investment that is explicitly expected to “outpace revenue growth,” as stated by the CFO, without jeopardizing liquidity or forcing difficult trade-offs. The recent capital allocation toward the East Coast facility ramp and the Accelerate conference, while creating near-term margin variability, are strategic investments in infrastructure and community-building that should yield long-term returns through improved service capacity and deeper brand relationships. Moreover, the company’s ability to fund these initiatives internally—without dilution or debt—preserves optionality for future acquisitions, strategic partnerships, or accelerated shareholder returns. The market may be focusing too narrowly on quarterly EPS volatility driven by timing of expenses, rather than recognizing that the underlying cash generation and balance sheet strength support a multi-year investment thesis where short-term expenses are precursors to long-term competitive advantage and margin expansion.

▼ Bear case

Pattern Group’s aggressive investment in research and development, while framed as a strategic necessity, introduces tangible risks to near-term profitability and margin stability that the market may be underappreciating. The company explicitly stated that R&D spend is expected to “outpace revenue growth,” with Q1 R&D (excluding stock-based compensation) rising 77% year over year to $10.1 million—a trajectory that, if sustained, could pressure operating leverage despite top-line expansion. Although management attributes some margin variability to timing of expenses such as the Accelerate conference and East Coast facility ramp, the cumulative effect of persistently elevated R&D—particularly in speculative areas like agentic transactions and LLM-driven optimization—could result in prolonged margin compression if revenue growth does not immediately scale to absorb these costs. The company’s own guidance reflects this tension, as it raised full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $200 million (up 31%) while acknowledging that such investments will create “some timing variations within quarterly adjusted EBITDA margin.” Furthermore, the historical pattern of tech-heavy companies overestimating the near-term monetization of AI innovations raises concerns that Pattern’s advanced systems like True ROAS and Pattern Intelligence (Pi) may not translate into quantifiable, sustainable revenue advantages quickly enough to justify the current burn rate. The market may be rewarding the narrative of innovation without sufficient scrutiny of whether these technologies are delivering differentiated, defensible value that commands premium pricing or significantly reduces churn—especially in an environment where clients could develop similar capabilities in-house or turn to lower-cost alternatives as AI tools become more commoditized.
Despite impressive growth in non-Amazon channels, Pattern remains meaningfully exposed to the policies, fee structures, and algorithmic changes of dominant marketplaces, particularly Amazon, which still represents a substantial portion of its revenue base. Although non-Amazon revenue grew 119% year over year, Amazon sales still increased at a healthy 38%, indicating that the company’s diversification is additive rather than substitutive in the near term. This creates a vulnerability to unilateral changes by Amazon—such as increases in referral fees, modifications to fulfillment requirements, or shifts in search ranking algorithms—that could disproportionately impact Pattern’s ability to deliver performance for its brand partners. The company’s reliance on passing through cost increases (like fuel surcharges) assumes that its contractual leverage with brand partners remains strong, but if marketplace costs rise faster than the value Pattern delivers, partners may begin to question the economic rationale of the relationship. Moreover, the company’s stated de-emphasis on category diversification—where CEO Wright noted it is “not a primary focus”—could limit its ability to pivot into new verticals if core categories face saturation, regulatory scrutiny, or shifts in consumer preference. The breadth of Pattern’s platform, while a strength, also risks becoming a jack-of-all-trades if it fails to develop deep, proprietary advantages in specific high-growth areas like social commerce or AI-driven search. The market may be assuming that the company’s scale and data advantages will automatically insulate it from platform risk, when in reality, its success remains intermediately tied to the whims of a few powerful gatekeepers whose interests may not always align with Pattern’s long-term strategy.
The company’s lofty pipeline valuation of $5 billion, while presented as a sign of long-term potential, lacks transparency and near-term convertibility, raising questions about whether it reflects genuine, actionable opportunities or merely exploratory discussions that may not materialize. CEO Wright acknowledged that this pipeline is “long-term” and that the company is not making “any immediate statements” about its realization, which introduces significant uncertainty regarding timing and probability of conversion. Without clear milestones, customer commitments, or revenue visibility attached to this pipeline, it risks becoming a vague aspirational figure rather than a concrete growth driver. This is especially relevant given the company’s own admission that “agentic transactions are developing more slowly than we initially expected,” suggesting that some of the most futuristic components of its pipeline—such as fully autonomous AI-driven purchasing—may be further out than implied by the headline number. Additionally, the breadth of the pipeline, described as growing across expanding categories and geographies, could indicate a lack of focus or prioritization, with resources spread thin across too many low-probability opportunities. The market may be assigning undue value to this pipeline as a proxy for future growth, when in reality, the conversion of early-stage opportunities into contracted revenue is subject to numerous execution risks, including sales cycle length, competitive displacement, and the ability to deliver on complex, multi-venue implementations. Until there is clearer evidence of pipeline maturation—such as increasing deal sizes, shorter sales cycles, or rising conversion rates—the $5 billion figure should be treated with skepticism as a forward-looking indicator.
Pattern’s dependence on the continued validity and enforceability of its intellectual property portfolio, while bolstered by recent patent grants, introduces legal and competitive risks that are not being sufficiently weighed against its growth ambitions. The True ROAS patent and the 41 patents issued or pending underlying Pattern Intelligence (Pi) are central to the company’s differentiation strategy, yet the breadth and speed of innovation in AI-driven advertising and autonomous systems increase the likelihood of workarounds, independent development, or challenges to patent validity. In fast-moving technological domains, patents often provide only temporary insulation, particularly if competitors can achieve similar outcomes through alternative architectures or if the underlying concepts are deemed abstract or insufficiently novel under evolving patent eligibility standards. Furthermore, the company’s reliance on proprietary models that weigh “organic market conditions and competitive dynamics” to calculate incrementality may be difficult to audit or validate independently, creating potential skepticism among brand partners who demand transparency in measurement methodologies. If clients begin to question the objectivity or accuracy of Pattern’s attribution models—especially as they gain access to more sophisticated in-house analytics tools—the perceived value of services like True ROAS could erode. The market may be assuming that patent ownership equates to durable competitive advantage, when in reality, the enforceability and commercial relevance of these protections in a global, rapidly evolving ecommerce landscape remain untested and could be circumvented through regulatory shifts, licensing demands, or the emergence of open-source alternatives that undermine the exclusivity of Pattern’s technological edge.

Pattern Group’s aggressive investment in research and development, while framed as a strategic necessity, introduces tangible risks to near-term profitability and margin stability that the market may be underappreciating. The company explicitly stated that R&D spend is expected to “outpace revenue growth,” with Q1 R&D (excluding stock-based compensation) rising 77% year over year to $10.1 million—a trajectory that, if sustained, could pressure operating leverage despite top-line expansion. Although management attributes some margin variability to timing of expenses such as the Accelerate conference and East Coast facility ramp, the cumulative effect of persistently elevated R&D—particularly in speculative areas like agentic transactions and LLM-driven optimization—could result in prolonged margin compression if revenue growth does not immediately scale to absorb these costs. The company’s own guidance reflects this tension, as it raised full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $200 million (up 31%) while acknowledging that such investments will create “some timing variations within quarterly adjusted EBITDA margin.” Furthermore, the historical pattern of tech-heavy companies overestimating the near-term monetization of AI innovations raises concerns that Pattern’s advanced systems like True ROAS and Pattern Intelligence (Pi) may not translate into quantifiable, sustainable revenue advantages quickly enough to justify the current burn rate. The market may be rewarding the narrative of innovation without sufficient scrutiny of whether these technologies are delivering differentiated, defensible value that commands premium pricing or significantly reduces churn—especially in an environment where clients could develop similar capabilities in-house or turn to lower-cost alternatives as AI tools become more commoditized.
Despite impressive growth in non-Amazon channels, Pattern remains meaningfully exposed to the policies, fee structures, and algorithmic changes of dominant marketplaces, particularly Amazon, which still represents a substantial portion of its revenue base. Although non-Amazon revenue grew 119% year over year, Amazon sales still increased at a healthy 38%, indicating that the company’s diversification is additive rather than substitutive in the near term. This creates a vulnerability to unilateral changes by Amazon—such as increases in referral fees, modifications to fulfillment requirements, or shifts in search ranking algorithms—that could disproportionately impact Pattern’s ability to deliver performance for its brand partners. The company’s reliance on passing through cost increases (like fuel surcharges) assumes that its contractual leverage with brand partners remains strong, but if marketplace costs rise faster than the value Pattern delivers, partners may begin to question the economic rationale of the relationship. Moreover, the company’s stated de-emphasis on category diversification—where CEO Wright noted it is “not a primary focus”—could limit its ability to pivot into new verticals if core categories face saturation, regulatory scrutiny, or shifts in consumer preference. The breadth of Pattern’s platform, while a strength, also risks becoming a jack-of-all-trades if it fails to develop deep, proprietary advantages in specific high-growth areas like social commerce or AI-driven search. The market may be assuming that the company’s scale and data advantages will automatically insulate it from platform risk, when in reality, its success remains intermediately tied to the whims of a few powerful gatekeepers whose interests may not always align with Pattern’s long-term strategy.
The company’s lofty pipeline valuation of $5 billion, while presented as a sign of long-term potential, lacks transparency and near-term convertibility, raising questions about whether it reflects genuine, actionable opportunities or merely exploratory discussions that may not materialize. CEO Wright acknowledged that this pipeline is “long-term” and that the company is not making “any immediate statements” about its realization, which introduces significant uncertainty regarding timing and probability of conversion. Without clear milestones, customer commitments, or revenue visibility attached to this pipeline, it risks becoming a vague aspirational figure rather than a concrete growth driver. This is especially relevant given the company’s own admission that “agentic transactions are developing more slowly than we initially expected,” suggesting that some of the most futuristic components of its pipeline—such as fully autonomous AI-driven purchasing—may be further out than implied by the headline number. Additionally, the breadth of the pipeline, described as growing across expanding categories and geographies, could indicate a lack of focus or prioritization, with resources spread thin across too many low-probability opportunities. The market may be assigning undue value to this pipeline as a proxy for future growth, when in reality, the conversion of early-stage opportunities into contracted revenue is subject to numerous execution risks, including sales cycle length, competitive displacement, and the ability to deliver on complex, multi-venue implementations. Until there is clearer evidence of pipeline maturation—such as increasing deal sizes, shorter sales cycles, or rising conversion rates—the $5 billion figure should be treated with skepticism as a forward-looking indicator.
Pattern’s dependence on the continued validity and enforceability of its intellectual property portfolio, while bolstered by recent patent grants, introduces legal and competitive risks that are not being sufficiently weighed against its growth ambitions. The True ROAS patent and the 41 patents issued or pending underlying Pattern Intelligence (Pi) are central to the company’s differentiation strategy, yet the breadth and speed of innovation in AI-driven advertising and autonomous systems increase the likelihood of workarounds, independent development, or challenges to patent validity. In fast-moving technological domains, patents often provide only temporary insulation, particularly if competitors can achieve similar outcomes through alternative architectures or if the underlying concepts are deemed abstract or insufficiently novel under evolving patent eligibility standards. Furthermore, the company’s reliance on proprietary models that weigh “organic market conditions and competitive dynamics” to calculate incrementality may be difficult to audit or validate independently, creating potential skepticism among brand partners who demand transparency in measurement methodologies. If clients begin to question the objectivity or accuracy of Pattern’s attribution models—especially as they gain access to more sophisticated in-house analytics tools—the perceived value of services like True ROAS could erode. The market may be assuming that patent ownership equates to durable competitive advantage, when in reality, the enforceability and commercial relevance of these protections in a global, rapidly evolving ecommerce landscape remain untested and could be circumvented through regulatory shifts, licensing demands, or the emergence of open-source alternatives that undermine the exclusivity of Pattern’s technological edge.

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Software - Application

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	SAP	Sap Se	208.91 Bn	20.22	4.86	7.05 Bn
2	YMM	Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.	188.77 Bn	322.09	-	0.00 Bn
3	SHOP	Shopify Inc.	145.98 Bn	109.59	11.80	-
4	UBER	Uber Technologies, Inc	141.48 Bn	16.32	2.64	10.51 Bn
5	CRM	Salesforce, Inc.	128.51 Bn	16.95	3.00	39.28 Bn
6	NOW	ServiceNow, Inc.	98.38 Bn	54.17	7.05	7.52 Bn
7	ADP	Automatic Data Processing Inc	97.56 Bn	22.45	4.52	3.98 Bn
8	SNOW	Snowflake Inc.	91.55 Bn	-76.63	18.19	-

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password