Cmb.Tech
NYSE: CMBT
$15.75 ▲ +0.14  (+0.90%)
At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap3.61 Bn
P/E6.72
P/S1.85
Div. Yield0.00
ROIC (Qtr)0.00
Add ratio to table…

About

CMB. TECH NV is a diversified maritime group that owns and operates a fleet of about 250 seagoing vessels including newbuildings, comprising dry bulk carriers, crude oil tankers, chemical tankers, container ships and offshore energy vessels. The company develops low carbon solutions across its divisions and supplies hydrogen and ammonia fuel to customers from its own production or third party sources. It also works on hydrogen powered industrial applications such as trucks,…

Read more ↓
Sector: Energy Industry: Oil & Gas Midstream CIK: 0001604481

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • CMB.TECH is positioned to capture outsized gains from the ongoing gas-to-coal switching driven by Middle East turmoil, a dynamic management highlighted but did not fully quantify in its guidance. The company noted that Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan could increase seaborne coal imports by 27 million tons, with Europe potentially adding another 12 million tons in base case and up to 60 million tons in high case. This translates to a potential 5.2% ton-mile demand increase for Capesizes and 7.5% for Panamaxes under high-case scenarios, significantly above the 1.7% fleet growth rate. With 80% of its 53,000 shipping days in 2026 exposed to spot markets—36,000 of which are in dry bulk (10,000 Kamsarmax, 26,000 Capes/Newcastlemax)—CMB.TECH is uniquely leveraged to benefit from any upside surprise in coal demand, especially as it has already fixed 80% of Q2 dry bulk days at $44,000 for Newcastlemax and 75% of Capesize days at $37,000, indicating strong forward visibility. The company’s large, modern fleet of 36 Newcastlemaxes (set to reach 46 in six months), 37 Capesizes, and 30 Kamsarmaxes allows it to capitalize on tightening supply-demand dynamics without needing new CapEx, as its remaining $1.2 billion CapEx is largely funded and set to decline after 2026. This creates a structural tailwind where free cash flow could exceed $1 billion annually in 2026 under current market assumptions—excluding vessel sales and remaining CapEx—while the balance sheet is already delevered to below 50% equity-to-assets, enabling aggressive shareholder returns. Management’s decision to distribute $0.64 per share (70% tax-exempt via share premium) signals confidence in sustained cash generation, and with net finance expenses already down to $81 million from $113 million last quarter, further margin reductions on $2 billion of financing set to take effect in Q2 will boost profitability. The market is underestimating how the combination of structural coal demand support, a fully funded newbuild program rolling off, and a spot-exposed fleet in recovering markets could drive multi-year free cash flow expansion beyond current expectations.
▼ Bear case
  • CMB.TECH’s apparent strength masks significant and underappreciated risks from the looming wall of new tanker supply that could crush freight rates despite current spot strength, a threat management acknowledged but downplayed by focusing on short-term positives. The company admitted the order book for VLCCs and Suezmaxes has surged to 500 vessels, with over 200 scheduled for delivery in 2028 alone, pushing the order book-to-fleet ratio toward 30%—a level historically associated with severe market oversupply. While management noted that the average fleet age is at historical highs (13–13.5 years), suggesting scrapping potential, they failed to address that behavioral inertia, regulatory delays (e.g., IMO 2023 carbon intensity requirements), and economic disincentives to scrap older, less efficient vessels could prevent timely absorption of this new supply. This is especially dangerous for CMB.TECH, which still has 6 VLCCs (4 operating, 2 pending delivery) and 18 Suezmaxes, making its tanker segment highly vulnerable to rate declines. The company’s current spot strength—$180,000/day for 80% of VLCC days and $122,000/day for most Suezmax days in Q2—is predicated on transient geopolitical disruptions (Strait of Hormuz closure reducing transits from 110–150 to 5–20/day), which are unlikely to persist. Once normal transit patterns resume, the ton-mile “kicker” from U.S. and alternative exports (currently balancing lost Middle Eastern volumes at 2.4x distance multiplier) will evaporate, leaving the market exposed to pure volume oversupply. Furthermore, CMB.TECH’s breakeven costs have risen sharply due to expensive newbuildings and secondhand acquisitions, meaning even moderate rate declines could pressure profitability. The market is ignoring how the confluence of delayed scrapping, persistent newbuild deliveries, and fading geopolitical tailwinds could create a perfect storm in tankers by 2027–2028, just as the company’s heavy CapEx year ends and it seeks to redeploy capital—potentially forcing it into distressed sales or low-return reinvestment at the worst possible time in the cycle.

Segment consolidation items [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segment consolidation items [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Oil & Gas Midstream
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. 2,970.16 Bn8,959.915,253.980.11 Bn
2 FLNG Flex LNG Ltd. 1,659.01 Bn18,718.634,884.381.82 Bn
3 ENB Enbridge Inc 124.02 Bn26.473.0878.78 Bn
4 EP-PC Kinder Morgan, Inc. 112.83 Bn33.016.4432.06 Bn
5 EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 83.80 Bn14.051.6333.91 Bn
6 TRP Tc Energy Corp 73.34 Bn29,565.5414.3533.55 Bn
7 ET Energy Transfer LP 70.48 Bn17.141.0069.36 Bn
8 TRGP Targa Resources Corp. 60.56 Bn28.403.6619.03 Bn