Zimmer Biomet Holdings (ZBH) Construction in Progress (2009 - 2014)
Zimmer Biomet Holdings (ZBH) reported Construction in Progress of $94.7 million for Q3 2014, up 5.7% from $89.6 million a year earlier and up 12.2% from the prior quarter.
Zimmer Biomet Holdings (ZBH) Construction in Progress (2009 - 2014) Analysis & Trends
At the end of FY2013, Zimmer Biomet Holdings posted Construction in Progress of $58.2 million, down 50.6% from FY2012.
- Construction in Progress has a four-year compound annual growth rate of -1.6% (FY2009 to FY2013).
- By year, Construction in Progress came in at $117.8 million in FY2012 (+54.2%), $76.4 million in FY2011 (+14.9%), $66.5 million in FY2010 (+7.3%) and $62 million in FY2009.
- The Q3 2014 figure ranks as the highest quarterly Construction in Progress since Q1 2013.
- Year over year, Construction in Progress gained in four of the last eight quarters, with growth averaging 1.5%.
- The high point for year-over-year Construction in Progress in five years was Q3 2012 (growth of 71.3%); the low point was Q4 2013 (a decline of 50.6%).
- Per Business Quant data, the three quarters before Q3 2014 came in at $84.4 million (Q2 2014), $75.1 million (Q1 2014) and $58.2 million (Q4 2013).
Peer Comparison
| # | Company | Market Cap | Enterprise Value | Gross Profit (Qtr) | Construction in Progress (Qtr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 249.71 Bn | 228.86 Bn | 4.88 Bn | - |
| 2 | Abbott Laboratories | 171.00 Bn | 142.08 Bn | 7.27 Bn | - |
| 3 | Danaher | 155.79 Bn | 139.61 Bn | 3.61 Bn | - |
| 4 | Intuitive Surgical | 143.91 Bn | 123.46 Bn | 1.96 Bn | - |
| 5 | Medtronic | 110.42 Bn | 76.29 Bn | 6.34 Bn | - |
| 6 | Stryker | 105.71 Bn | 91.82 Bn | 4.50 Bn | - |
| 7 | Boston Scientific | 63.26 Bn | 58.27 Bn | 3.85 Bn | 911.00 Mn |
| 8 | Edwards Lifesciences | 49.80 Bn | 33.91 Bn | 1.35 Bn | - |
| 9 | Becton Dickinson | 48.78 Bn | 45.93 Bn | 2.32 Bn | - |
| 10 | Zimmer Biomet Holdings | 16.94 Bn | 14.23 Bn | 1.54 Bn | - |
Historic Data
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2014 | 94.70 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 84.40 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2014 | 75.10 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2013 | 58.20 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 89.60 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 82.80 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2013 | 123.30 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2012 | 117.80 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2012 | 102.10 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 83.20 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2012 | 81.00 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 76.40 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2011 | 59.60 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 65.90 Mn |
| Mar 31, 2011 | 65.20 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2010 | 66.50 Mn |
| Sep 30, 2010 | 62.10 Mn |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 60.50 Mn |
| Dec 31, 2009 | 62.00 Mn |
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Construction in Progress API
Pull this series into your own models, spreadsheets and apps with the Business Quant
Historical Metrics API. The request below matches the chart above — change the
frequency, period or values and it follows. Swap YOUR_API_KEY for your own key.
https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=construction-in-progress&ticker=ZBH&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY
import requests
url = "https://data.businessquant.com/historic"
params = {"slug": "construction-in-progress", "ticker": "ZBH", "period": "max", "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY"}
data = requests.get(url, params=params).json()
const res = await fetch("https://data.businessquant.com/historic?slug=construction-in-progress&ticker=ZBH&period=max&api_key=YOUR_API_KEY");
const data = await res.json();