Compare
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund, side by side on every metric on file. 67 of 99 differ — fees, returns, holdings, sector exposure and tracking.
VTI is the cheapest at 0.03% a year and VXUS the most expensive at 0.05% — a gap of about $2.00 per $10,000 invested, every year.
Over the past year VXUS returned the most at 22.1%, against 18.5% for VTI. Those are price returns — distributions are not in them — and last year says nothing about the next one.
VTI is the largest at $1.99T in net assets, and the portfolios are spread differently: VXUS holds 8,841 positions against 3,487 for VTI.
| Metric | VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Tags | Index Fund | Index Fund |
| Geography | US | International |
| Family | VANGUARD INDEX FUNDS | VANGUARD STAR FUNDS |
| Structure | Lends Securities | Lends Securities |
| Fees | ||
| AFFE | — | — |
| Gross Expense | 0.03% | 0.05% |
| Min. Investment | $1 | $3.0K |
| Net Expense | 0.03% | 0.05% |
| Size | ||
| AUM | $1.99T | $629.12B |
| Returns | ||
| 2021 | 25.7% | 8.69% |
| 2022 | -19.5% | -16.0% |
| 2023 | 26.0% | 15.6% |
| 2024 | 23.8% | 5.20% |
| 2025 | 17.1% | 32.2% |
| 10Y Ann. (Prospectus) | — | — |
| 5Y Ann. (Prospectus) | — | — |
| Since Inception (Prospectus) | — | — |
| Worst Quarter (Prospectus) | -20.9% | -24.3% |
| 1M | 3.66% | 5.13% |
| 1Y | 18.5% | 22.1% |
| 3M | 2.07% | 1.78% |
| 3Y Ann. | 19.9% | 16.5% |
| 5Y Ann. | 10.3% | 5.92% |
| 6M | 12.0% | 4.43% |
| YTD | 13.2% | 16.0% |
| Total 12M | 18.2% | 33.8% |
| Total 1M | -4.96% | 8.17% |
| Total 3M | -3.97% | 4.09% |
| Total 6M | -1.62% | 13.3% |
| Market Cap | ||
| Large Cap | 35.8% | — |
| Cap Coverage | 96.3% | 22.1% |
| Mega Cap | 57.8% | — |
| Micro Cap | 0.13% | — |
| Mid Cap | 5.41% | — |
| Size Style | Large Cap | — |
| Small Cap | 0.95% | — |
| Avg Mkt Cap | $1.43T | — |
| Valuation | ||
| Look-Through Yield | 1.05% | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.94 | — |
| P/E | 24.48 | — |
| P/S | 3.11 | — |
| Asset Mix | ||
| Derivatives | 0.09% | 1.10% |
| Equity | 99.6% | 96.5% |
| Fixed Income | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Fund & Cash | 0.35% | 2.43% |
| Other Assets | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector | ||
| Basic Materials | 2.02% | 1.49% |
| Communication Services | 1.36% | 0.07% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.28% | 0.84% |
| Consumer Staples | 4.22% | 0.76% |
| Energy | 3.47% | 3.33% |
| Financial Services | 11.0% | 6.30% |
| Healthcare | 9.50% | 2.00% |
| Industrials | 9.46% | 1.68% |
| Other / Unclass. | 6.13% | 74.3% |
| Real Estate | 1.78% | 0.25% |
| Technology | 41.4% | 8.37% |
| Utilities | 1.40% | 0.63% |
| Top Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Top Sector % | 44.1% | 32.6% |
| Bond Character | ||
| Corporate | 99.6% | 96.1% |
| Municipal | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-US Sovereign | 0.00% | 0.05% |
| Agency & GSE | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Treasury | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Geography | ||
| US Weight | 97.4% | 0.61% |
| Top Country | United States | Japan |
| Portfolio | ||
| Holdings | 3,487 | 8,841 |
| Short | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| Concentration | ||
| Effective Holdings | 61 | 249 |
| Top 10 | 33.2% | 14.0% |
| Largest Position | 6.39% | 3.99% |
| Top Holding | NVIDIA Corp.NVDA | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. |
| Flows | ||
| Positive Months | 55.6% | 72.2% |
| Flow 12M % | -0.06% | 3.12% |
| Flow 12M | -$1.21B | $19.64B |
| Flow 1M % | 0.66% | -0.10% |
| Flow 3M % | 1.12% | -0.19% |
| Cost of Ownership | ||
| Fund Age | 10.2 | 10.2 |
| Turnover | 3.00% | 4.00% |
| Risk | ||
| Spread HY | — | — |
| Spread IG | — | — |
| DV01 10Y | — | — |
| Liabilities % | 0.09% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Diff. | -0.15% | 0.12% |
| Tracking Error | 0.04% | 13.1% |
| Identity | ||
| CIK | 36405 | 1004655 |
| Class ID | C000007808 | C000094038 |
| Share Class | ETF Shares | ETF Shares |
| Data | Holdings, Flows, AUM, Returns, Profile, Prices | Holdings, Flows, AUM, Returns, Profile, Prices |
| Flows Date | 31 Mar 2026 | 30 Apr 2026 |
| Portfolio Date | 31 Jul 2026 | 31 Jul 2026 |
| AUM Date | 31 Mar 2026 | 30 Apr 2026 |
| Price Date | 28 Aug 2026 | 28 Aug 2026 |
| Returns Date | 28 Apr 2026 | 27 Feb 2026 |
| Prospectus Date | 28 Apr 2026 | 27 Feb 2026 |
| Series ID | S000002848 | S000002932 |
| Total Ret. Date | 31 Mar 2026 | 30 Apr 2026 |
Yes. VTI charges 0.03% a year against 0.05% for VXUS — about $2.00 a year on every $10,000 invested. The fee is deducted from the fund's assets daily, so it is already inside every return figure on this page rather than billed separately.
Of the 99 metrics on file for both, 67 differ and the rest match. The table below lists the differences first; untick “only what differs” to see everything, including what they agree on.
Over the last twelve months VXUS returned 22.1% and VTI returned 18.5%. Those are price returns measured to the last close on file and exclude distributions, so a fund paying a larger yield looks worse on this line than it was. Past performance is not a forecast, and one year is a short window.
Nothing stops you, but check the overlap first: the sector and holdings rows below show how much of each portfolio is the same securities in the same weights. Two funds tracking the same index are one position held twice, not diversification. This page reports the numbers and does not give investment advice.