Compare
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund vs iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, side by side on every metric on file. 111 of 144 differ — fees, returns, holdings, sector exposure and tracking.
Both funds charge the same 0.03% a year.
Over the past year BND returned the most at -4.3%, against -4.34% for AGG. Those are price returns — distributions are not in them — and last year says nothing about the next one.
BND is the largest at $397.11B in net assets, and the portfolios are spread differently: AGG holds 13,428 positions against 10,079 for BND.
| Metric | BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund | AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Tags | Index Fund | Index Fund |
| Geography | US | US |
| Family | VANGUARD BOND INDEX FUNDS | iShares Trust |
| Structure | — | Lends Securities |
| Fees | ||
| AFFE | — | 0.00% |
| Gross Expense | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Min. Investment | $3.0K | — |
| Net Expense | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Size | ||
| AUM | $397.11B | $136.46B |
| Returns | ||
| 2021 | -1.66% | -1.67% |
| 2022 | -13.2% | -13.1% |
| 2023 | 5.70% | 5.58% |
| 2024 | 1.34% | 1.37% |
| 2025 | 7.11% | 7.19% |
| 10Y Ann. (Prospectus) | — | 1.97% |
| 5Y Ann. (Prospectus) | — | -0.38% |
| Since Inception (Prospectus) | — | — |
| Worst Quarter (Prospectus) | -5.94% | -5.86% |
| 1M | -1.41% | -1.45% |
| 1Y | -4.30% | -4.34% |
| 3M | -2.92% | -2.99% |
| 3Y Ann. | 0.16% | 0.11% |
| 5Y Ann. | -3.76% | -3.70% |
| 6M | -3.37% | -3.46% |
| YTD | -3.87% | -3.94% |
| Total 12M | 3.70% | 5.13% |
| Total 1M | 0.23% | 0.30% |
| Total 3M | 0.70% | -1.33% |
| Total 6M | 0.71% | 0.22% |
| Market Cap | ||
| Large Cap | — | — |
| Cap Coverage | — | — |
| Mega Cap | — | — |
| Micro Cap | — | — |
| Mid Cap | — | — |
| Size Style | — | — |
| Small Cap | — | — |
| Avg Mkt Cap | — | — |
| Valuation | ||
| Look-Through Yield | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | — |
| P/E | — | — |
| P/S | — | — |
| Asset Mix | ||
| Derivatives | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Equity | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Fixed Income | 98.8% | 95.3% |
| Fund & Cash | 1.20% | 4.71% |
| Other Assets | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector | ||
| Basic Materials | 0.45% | 0.42% |
| Communication Services | 1.29% | 1.32% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 1.37% | 1.22% |
| Consumer Staples | 1.02% | 1.06% |
| Energy | 1.34% | 1.18% |
| Financial Services | 5.74% | 5.21% |
| Healthcare | 2.32% | 2.12% |
| Industrials | 1.96% | 1.84% |
| Other / Unclass. | 79.3% | 81.0% |
| Real Estate | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Technology | 2.80% | 2.55% |
| Utilities | 1.63% | 1.46% |
| Top Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Top Sector % | 27.8% | 27.4% |
| Bond Character | ||
| Avg Coupon | 3.92% | 3.80% |
| Corporate | 34.5% | 24.8% |
| Dated Holdings | 9,992.0 | 13,424.0 |
| Rate Sensitivity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Effective Duration | 5.69 | 5.82 |
| Effective Maturity | 7.82 | 7.96 |
| Municipal | 0.55% | 0.52% |
| Non-US Sovereign | 3.00% | 2.24% |
| Agency & GSE | 9.12% | 22.8% |
| Treasury | 47.9% | 44.8% |
| Avg Legal Maturity | 11.68 | 11.82 |
| Geography | ||
| US Weight | 89.0% | 94.8% |
| Top Country | United States | United States |
| Portfolio | ||
| Holdings | 10,079 | 13,428 |
| Short | 0.25% | 1.97% |
| Concentration | ||
| Effective Holdings | 384 | 470 |
| Top 10 | 10.3% | 7.71% |
| Largest Position | 1.36% | 2.70% |
| topholding_cusip | — | 066922519 |
| Top Holding | Federal National Mortgage Assn. | BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY |
| topholding_ticker | — | — |
| Flows | ||
| Positive Months | 91.7% | 80.3% |
| Flow 12M % | 9.88% | 8.54% |
| Flow 12M | $39.25B | $11.65B |
| Flow 1M % | 0.92% | 0.83% |
| Flow 3M % | 2.90% | -0.54% |
| Cost of Ownership | ||
| Fund Age | 10.2 | 23.0 |
| Turnover | 38.0% | 62.0% |
| Risk | ||
| Spread HY | -$391.2K | $0 |
| Spread IG | -$46.3M | $10.6M |
| DV01 10Y | -$2 | $2 |
| Liabilities % | 1.29% | 3.39% |
| Tracking Diff. | -0.18% | -0.02% |
| Tracking Error | 0.78% | 0.42% |
| Risk Ratios | ||
| Std Dev 6M | 4.34% | 4.47% |
| Std Dev YTD | 4.17% | 4.29% |
| Std Dev 1Y | 3.91% | 4.04% |
| Std Dev 2Y | 4.52% | 4.65% |
| Std Dev 3Y | 5.20% | 5.31% |
| Std Dev 5Y | 6.09% | 6.17% |
| Max Drawdown 6M | -3.98% | -4.04% |
| Max Drawdown YTD | -5.40% | -5.50% |
| Max Drawdown 1Y | -5.40% | -5.50% |
| Max Drawdown 2Y | -5.61% | -5.67% |
| Max Drawdown 3Y | -5.99% | -6.04% |
| Max Drawdown 5Y | -21.4% | -21.1% |
| Sharpe 6M | -2.41 | -2.38 |
| Sharpe YTD | -2.20 | -2.16 |
| Sharpe 1Y | -2.06 | -2.01 |
| Sharpe 2Y | -1.49 | -1.46 |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.80 | -0.79 |
| Sharpe 5Y | -1.23 | -1.20 |
| Sortino 6M | -2.98 | -2.94 |
| Sortino YTD | -2.74 | -2.68 |
| Sortino 1Y | -2.56 | -2.48 |
| Sortino 2Y | -1.92 | -1.87 |
| Sortino 3Y | -1.07 | -1.05 |
| Sortino 5Y | -1.63 | -1.59 |
| Alpha 6M | -14.9% | -15.3% |
| Alpha YTD | -11.0% | -11.2% |
| Alpha 1Y | -9.28% | -9.42% |
| Alpha 2Y | -7.41% | -7.53% |
| Alpha 3Y | -5.17% | -5.32% |
| Alpha 5Y | -8.11% | -8.09% |
| Beta 6M | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Beta YTD | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Beta 1Y | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Beta 2Y | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Beta 3Y | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| Beta 5Y | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| Identity | ||
| Benchmark | I:SP500 | I:SP500 |
| CIK | 1004655 | 1100663 |
| Share Class | ETF Shares | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
| Class ID | C000046844 | C000012092 |
| Data | Holdings, Flows, AUM, Returns, Profile, Prices, Ratios | Holdings, Flows, AUM, Returns, Profile, Prices, Ratios |
| Flows Date | 30 Jun 2026 | 31 May 2026 |
| Portfolio Date | 31 Aug 2026 | 16 Sep 2026 |
| AUM Date | 30 Jun 2026 | 31 May 2026 |
| Price Date | 18 Sep 2026 | 18 Sep 2026 |
| Returns Date | 28 Apr 2026 | 18 Jun 2026 |
| Prospectus Date | 28 Apr 2026 | 29 Jun 2026 |
| Series ID | S000002564 | S000004362 |
| Total Ret. Date | 30 Jun 2026 | 31 May 2026 |
Yes — each charges 0.03% a year. On cost there is nothing to choose between them.
Of the 144 metrics on file for both, 111 differ and the rest match. The table below lists the differences first; untick “only what differs” to see everything, including what they agree on.
Over the last twelve months BND returned -4.3% and AGG returned -4.34%. Those are price returns measured to the last close on file and exclude distributions, so a fund paying a larger yield looks worse on this line than it was. Past performance is not a forecast, and one year is a short window.
Nothing stops you, but check the overlap first: the sector and holdings rows below show how much of each portfolio is the same securities in the same weights. Two funds tracking the same index are one position held twice, not diversification. This page reports the numbers and does not give investment advice.