Compare

AGG vs BND

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund, side by side on every metric on file. 121 of 161 differ — fees, returns, holdings, sector exposure and tracking.

AGG ETF
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
×
BND ETF
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
×

AGG vs BND: the short answer

Both funds charge the same 0.03% a year.

Over the past year BND returned the most at -4.48%, against -4.6% for AGG. Those are price returns — distributions are not in them — and last year says nothing about the next one.

BND is the largest at $397.11B in net assets, and the portfolios are spread differently: AGG holds 13,479 positions against 10,094 for BND.

AGG vs BND at a glance

Best 1-year
BND
-4.48% price return
Largest
BND
$397.11B in assets
Metrics compared
161
121 of them differ

AGG vs BND: all 161 metrics

Metric AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
Profile
Category Fixed Income Fixed Income
Tags Index Fund Index Fund
Geography US US
Family iShares Trust VANGUARD BOND INDEX FUNDS
Structure Lends Securities —
Fees
AFFE 0.00% —
Waiver Expiry 30 Jun 2027 —
Gross Expense 0.03% 0.03%
Min. Investment — $3.0K
Net Expense 0.03% 0.03%
Size
AUM $138.32B $397.11B
Returns
2021 -1.67% -1.66%
2022 -13.1% -13.2%
2023 5.58% 5.70%
2024 1.37% 1.34%
2025 7.19% 7.11%
Last Distribution 0.33 0.25
Last Ex-Date 1 Oct 2026 1 Oct 2026
Dist. TTM 3.97 2.94
Dist. Yield TTM 4.12% 4.12%
Div. Yield TTM 4.12% 4.12%
10Y Ann. (Prospectus) 1.97% —
5Y Ann. (Prospectus) -0.38% —
Since Inception (Prospectus) — —
Worst Quarter (Prospectus) -5.86% -5.94%
1M 1.63% 1.64%
1Y -4.60% -4.48%
3M -1.44% -1.38%
3Y Ann. 1.35% 1.36%
5Y Ann. -3.46% -3.52%
6M -2.84% -2.74%
1M + Dist. 1.98% 1.99%
1Y + Dist. -0.67% -0.55%
3M + Dist. -0.40% -0.34%
3Y Ann. + Dist. 5.18% 5.15%
5Y Ann. + Dist. -0.37% -0.38%
6M + Dist. -0.82% -0.71%
YTD + Dist. -0.75% -0.65%
YTD -3.73% -3.63%
Total 12M 1.88% 3.70%
Total 1M 0.38% 0.23%
Total 3M -0.69% 0.70%
Total 6M -2.01% 0.71%
Market Cap
Large Cap — —
Cap Coverage — —
Mega Cap — —
Micro Cap — —
Mid Cap — —
Size Style — —
Small Cap — —
Avg Mkt Cap — —
Valuation
Look-Through Yield — —
EV/EBITDA — —
P/E — —
P/S — —
Asset Mix
Derivatives 0.00% 0.00%
Equity 0.00% 0.00%
Fixed Income 94.9% 99.1%
Fund & Cash 5.07% 0.91%
Other Assets 0.00% 0.00%
Sector
Basic Materials 0.40% 0.45%
Communication Services 1.33% 1.33%
Consumer Discretionary 1.21% 1.34%
Consumer Staples 1.04% 1.02%
Energy 1.15% 1.33%
Financial Services 5.53% 12.8%
Healthcare 2.14% 2.32%
Industrials 1.72% 1.94%
Other / Unclass. 80.6% 71.6%
Real Estate 0.61% 0.75%
Technology 2.45% 2.78%
Utilities 1.85% 2.35%
Top Sector Financial Services Financial Services
Top Sector % 28.4% 45.0%
Bond Character
Avg Coupon 3.82% 3.95%
Corporate 24.3% 32.9%
Dated Holdings 13,475.0 10,011.0
Rate Sensitivity 0.00 0.00
Effective Duration 5.76 5.69
Effective Maturity 7.89 7.82
Municipal 0.36% 0.37%
Non-US Sovereign 2.63% 3.42%
Agency & GSE 22.8% 9.20%
Treasury 44.7% 48.3%
Avg Legal Maturity 11.75 11.68
Geography
US Weight 94.8% 88.9%
Top Country United States United States
Portfolio
Holdings 13,479 10,094
Short 2.19% 0.22%
Concentration
Effective Holdings 437 393
Top 10 8.04% 9.95%
Largest Position 2.88% 1.34%
topholding_cusip 066922519 —
Top Holding BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY Federal National Mortgage Assn.
topholding_ticker — —
Flows
Positive Months 81.0% 91.7%
Flow 12M % 8.27% 9.88%
Flow 12M $11.44B $39.25B
Flow 1M % 0.84% 0.92%
Flow 3M % 3.04% 2.90%
Cost of Ownership
Fund Age 23.1 10.4
Turnover 62.0% 38.0%
Risk
Spread HY $0 -$391.2K
Spread IG $12.6M -$46.3M
DV01 10Y $2 -$2
Liabilities % 3.17% 1.29%
Tracking Diff. -0.02% -0.18%
Tracking Error 0.42% 0.78%
Risk Ratios
Std Dev 6M 4.55% 4.43%
Std Dev YTD 4.42% 4.31%
Std Dev 1Y 4.29% 4.16%
Std Dev 2Y 4.70% 4.57%
Std Dev 3Y 5.13% 5.02%
Std Dev 5Y 6.20% 6.12%
Max Drawdown 6M -5.27% -5.20%
Max Drawdown YTD -7.17% -7.04%
Max Drawdown 1Y -7.17% -7.04%
Max Drawdown 2Y -7.17% -7.04%
Max Drawdown 3Y -7.70% -7.62%
Max Drawdown 5Y -20.5% -20.8%
Sharpe 6M -2.08 -2.09
Sharpe YTD -1.87 -1.89
Sharpe 1Y -1.96 -1.99
Sharpe 2Y -1.09 -1.12
Sharpe 3Y -0.59 -0.60
Sharpe 5Y -1.17 -1.20
Sortino 6M -2.65 -2.67
Sortino YTD -2.37 -2.40
Sortino 1Y -2.45 -2.50
Sortino 2Y -1.42 -1.47
Sortino 3Y -0.79 -0.81
Sortino 5Y -1.55 -1.59
Alpha 6M -11.5% -11.2%
Alpha YTD -9.90% -9.67%
Alpha 1Y -9.47% -9.28%
Alpha 2Y -5.80% -5.71%
Alpha 3Y -4.27% -4.15%
Alpha 5Y -7.88% -7.91%
Beta 6M 0.17 0.16
Beta YTD 0.14 0.13
Beta 1Y 0.13 0.12
Beta 2Y 0.06 0.05
Beta 3Y 0.07 0.06
Beta 5Y 0.08 0.08
Identity
Benchmark I:SP500 I:SP500
CIK 1100663 1004655
Share Class iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF ETF Shares
Class ID C000012092 C000046844
Data Holdings, Flows, AUM, Returns, Profile, Prices, Ratios Holdings, Flows, AUM, Returns, Profile, Prices, Ratios
Fiscal Year End 02-28 12-31
Flows Date 31 Aug 2026 30 Jun 2026
Portfolio Date 27 Oct 2026 30 Sep 2026
NAV Date 28 Oct 2026 27 Oct 2026
NAV 95.90 71.28
NAV Source Issuer Issuer
AUM Date 31 Aug 2026 30 Jun 2026
Price Date 29 Oct 2026 29 Oct 2026
Returns Date 18 Jun 2026 28 Apr 2026
Prospectus Date 29 Jun 2026 28 Apr 2026
Series ID S000004362 S000002564
Total Ret. Date 31 Aug 2026 30 Jun 2026

Reading this comparison. A blank cell means not disclosed, never zero. Green marks the best value in a row and red the worst, but only on the sixteen metrics where better is a fact rather than a view — a lower fee, a lower tracking error, a higher return, a larger net inflow. Nothing is coloured on size, turnover or portfolio weights, where more is not better and a tint would be an opinion. A row where the funds tie is left uncoloured. Return columns are price returns; Total Return columns are the fund's own distribution-inclusive figures and end at its last reported portfolio date, so the two are not comparable with each other. Every figure comes from Business Quant's ETF and mutual fund database.

Measured on. Prices 29 Oct 2026 · Portfolios 29 Oct 2026 · AUM and flows 30 Sep 2026 · Prospectus 29 Oct 2026. The four do not move on one clock, so each row carries the date of the record it came from rather than the date you loaded the page.

Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Screen the whole universe on the ETF and mutual fund screener.

AGG vs BND: common questions

Do AGG and BND cost the same?

Yes — each charges 0.03% a year. On cost there is nothing to choose between them.

How different are AGG and BND really?

Of the 161 metrics on file for both, 121 differ and the rest match. The table below lists the differences first; untick “only what differs” to see everything, including what they agree on.

Which performed better, AGG or BND?

Over the last twelve months BND returned -4.48% and AGG returned -4.6%. Those are price returns measured to the last close on file and exclude distributions, so a fund paying a larger yield looks worse on this line than it was. Past performance is not a forecast, and one year is a short window.

Can I hold both AGG and BND?

Nothing stops you, but check the overlap first: the sector and holdings rows below show how much of each portfolio is the same securities in the same weights. Two funds tracking the same index are one position held twice, not diversification. This page reports the numbers and does not give investment advice.