LFS vs GHC vs PRDO Stock Comparison

Leifras, Graham Holdings and Perdoceo Education Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EDU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LFS LEIFRAS Co., Ltd.
$2.10 -1.9% 1M -36.9% 1Y
Market cap
$52.90M
P/E
17.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$78.98M
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
GHC Graham Holdings Co
$1,170.13 +2.5% 1M +10.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.91B
P/E
9.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.07B
Div. yield
0.04%
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
PRDO PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp
$31.48 +4.9% 1M -14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.96B
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$858.61M
Div. yield
0.02%
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Graham Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Graham Holdings 5, Perdoceo Education 5, Leifras 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFSGHCPRDOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $52.90M $4.91B $1.96B GHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.4x 9.1x 11.1x GHC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.4x 10.2x PRDO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.9% +4.8% +11.7% PRDO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.8% 10.7% 20.6% PRDO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.6% 3.5% — LFS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.9x -0.9x — LFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.02% GHC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -36.9% +10.4% -14.2% GHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +14.8%/yr +24.3%/yr PRDO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 247.9% 23.2% 35.9% GHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 42/100 74/100 PRDO

Percentile Scorecard

LFSGHCPRDO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFSGHCPRDO
Valuation 63 #13 of 33 66 #12 of 33 81 #7 of 33
Growth 38 #19 of 30 31 #21 of 30 35 #20 of 30
Profitability 41 #17 of 28 26 #21 of 28 96 #2 of 28
Financial Health 81 #8 of 37 64 #14 of 37 97 #2 of 37
Shareholder Returns – 23 #11 of 14 62 #6 of 14
Overall 55 42 74
  • LFS ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • GHC ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • PRDO ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFSGHCPRDOSPY
1 month -1.9%+2.5%+4.9% +0.9%
3 months -5.0%-5.3%-8.9% +5.9%
6 months +9.4%+1.8%-8.3% +8.5%
Year to date -24.2%+6.5%+7.3% +13.3%
1 year -36.9%+10.4%-14.2% +12.4%
3 years —+106.8%+75.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+27.4%+20.7% +23.5%
5 years —+99.7%+196.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+14.8%+24.3% +11.0%
10 years —+147.3%+345.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+9.5%+16.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLFSGHCPRDOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 247.9%23.2%35.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 138.2%23.4%42.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.330.27-0.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.150.45-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.7%-20.3%-27.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -81.5%-5.5%-17.0% -0.9%
52-week high $11.37$1,238.69$37.95 $779.14
52-week low $1.68$1,012.13$27.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFSGHCPRDO
P/E now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 14.9x 9.2xmedian 14.9x 11.1xmedian 14.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 9.3x 11.8xmedian 9.3x 2.7xmedian 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 14.5x 20.1xmedian 14.5x 9.0xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.8x 1.0xmedian 1.8x 1.9xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 0.23median 0.35 0.77median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFSGHCPRDO
Revenue $78.98M $5.07B $858.61M
Gross profit $24.53M $1.52B $661.90M
Operating income $4.30M $256.19M $210.88M
Net income $3.04M $550.25M $177.12M
Free cash flow $2.56M $247.96M $217.98M
EPS (diluted) $0.12 $125.75 $2.79
Cash & equivalents $15.94M $156.77M $734.82M
Total debt $10.41M $900.37M –
Shares (diluted) 25.19M 4.31M 63.59M
Enterprise value -$11.25M $7.86M -$2.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFSGHCPRDO
P/E 17.4x 9.2x 11.1x
P/FCF 21.5x 20.1x 9.0x
P/Operating cash flow 21.1x 15.3x 8.7x
P/S 0.7x 1.0x 2.3x
P/B 4.6x 1.0x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 1.1x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 7.9x 11.8x 2.7x
EV/EBIT 9.3x 18.1x 3.1x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 0.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF 15.7x 18.7x 3.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.4x 14.2x 2.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.23 0.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFSGHCPRDO
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.9% 4.8% 11.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% 5.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.8% 1.0% 9.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.1% 3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.1% -6.6% 13.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 41.6% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% -20.5% 14.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 36.2% 11.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 13.2% -19.4% 20.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 40.4% 14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -48.2% -33.9% 6.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.1% 12.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -43.8% -40.8% 6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 32.3% 13.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFSGHCPRDO
Gross margin 31.1% 29.9% 77.1%
EBITDA margin 6.5% 7.8% 29.0%
Operating margin 5.4% 5.1% 24.6%
Pretax margin 5.6% 14.1% 26.9%
Net margin 3.8% 10.7% 20.6%
FCF margin 3.2% 4.9% 25.4%
Operating cash flow margin 3.3% 6.4% 26.2%
Return on equity 25.6% 11.5% 17.3%
Return on assets 10.3% 6.7% 13.4%
Return on invested capital 22.6% 3.5% –
Return on capital employed 26.8% 3.7% 18.5%
Asset turnover 2.6x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFSGHCPRDO
Debt / assets 3.7% 11.1% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.9x -0.9x –
Debt / FCF 0.4x 3.6x –
Liabilities / assets 61.0% 41.1% 22.6%
Equity / assets 39.0% 58.9% 77.4%
Interest coverage 52.8x 4.9x 34.1x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.9x 4.7x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.5x 7.9x
Cash ratio 1.1x 1.0x 7.6x
Altman Z-score 5.36 3.25 6.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFSGHCPRDO
Dividend yield – 0.6% 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 2.4% 4.5%
Shareholder yield – 3.1% 6.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.0% 21.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 77.7% 17.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 528.1% 11.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 83.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFSGHCPRDO
Forward P/E – 15.4xFY2026 10.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $76.14FY2026 $3.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +14.5%FY2026 +27.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -16.0% +4.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.97BFY2026 $877.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.3%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.0% -5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFSGHCPRDO
Held by institutions – 83.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 337 340
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.4% +1.9%
Institutions buying – 149 173
Institutions selling – 110 113
Buyers to sellers – 1.35 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFSGHCPRDO
LFS 1.00 -0.04 0.08
GHC -0.04 1.00 0.40
PRDO 0.08 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFS, GHC and PRDO?

Graham Holdings (GHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Leifras (LFS) $52.90M, Graham Holdings (GHC) $4.91B, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) $1.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, LFS, GHC and PRDO?

Graham Holdings (GHC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Leifras (LFS) 17.4x, Graham Holdings (GHC) 9.1x, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 11.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) is cheapest (Graham Holdings (GHC) 15.4x, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 10.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Perdoceo Education (PRDO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Leifras (LFS) +6.9%, Graham Holdings (GHC) +4.8%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) +11.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Perdoceo Education (PRDO) has the highest net margin (Leifras (LFS) 3.8%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 10.7%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Leifras (LFS) leads (Leifras (LFS) 22.6%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Graham Holdings (GHC) returned the most: Leifras (LFS) -36.9%, Graham Holdings (GHC) +10.4%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) -14.2%. Over five years, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) compounded fastest (Graham Holdings (GHC) +14.8%/yr, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) +24.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Graham Holdings (GHC) has the highest dividend yield: Leifras (LFS) 0.00%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 0.04%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 0.02%. Leifras (LFS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graham Holdings (GHC) has been the steadiest (Leifras (LFS) 247.9%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 23.2%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LFS, GHC and PRDO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Graham Holdings (GHC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.