LFS vs LAUR Stock Comparison

Leifras and Laureate Education Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LFS LEIFRAS Co., Ltd.
$2.08 -2.8% 1M -30.7% 1Y
Market cap
$53.15M
P/E
17.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$78.98M
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win
LAUR Laureate Education, Inc.
$37.64 +0.6% 1M +25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.07B
P/E
15.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.83B
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Laureate Education leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Laureate Education 8, Leifras 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFSLAURLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $53.15M $5.07B LAUR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.5x 15.8x LAUR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.9% +17.9% LAUR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.8% 17.6% LAUR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.6% 24.7% LAUR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.9x 0.1x LFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.7% +25.8% LAUR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +17.5%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 248.1% 33.0% LAUR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 70/100 LAUR

Percentile Scorecard

LFSLAUR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFSLAUR
Valuation 63 #13 of 33 31 #23 of 33
Growth 38 #19 of 30 83 #6 of 30
Profitability 39 #18 of 29 93 #3 of 29
Financial Health 79 #9 of 39 58 #17 of 39
Shareholder Returns – 85 #3 of 14
Overall 55 70
  • LFS ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • LAUR ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFSLAURSPY
1 month -2.8%+0.6% -0.2%
3 months -8.0%-0.2% +3.9%
6 months +6.1%+19.9% +8.2%
Year to date -24.9%+11.8% +12.9%
1 year -30.7%+25.8% +12.3%
3 years —+164.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+38.3% +23.3%
5 years —+123.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+17.5% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureLFSLAURSPY
Volatility, 1Y 248.1%33.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 138.2%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.340.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.120.78 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.7%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -81.7%-7.0% -1.2%
52-week high $11.37$40.46 $779.14
52-week low $1.68$28.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFSLAUR
P/E now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 15.2x 16.3xmedian 15.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.3x 2.8xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 9.8x 9.8xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.3xmedian 14.5x 18.1xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.0x 4.5xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 0.30median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFSLAUR
Revenue $78.98M $1.83B
Gross profit $24.53M $498.85M
Operating income $4.30M $446.85M
Net income $3.04M $321.53M
Free cash flow $2.56M $286.58M
EPS (diluted) $0.12 $2.30
Cash & equivalents $15.94M $161.67M
Total debt $10.41M $223.17M
Shares (diluted) 25.19M 139.94M
Enterprise value -$11.00M $4.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFSLAUR
P/E 17.3x 16.3x
P/FCF 21.3x 18.1x
P/Operating cash flow 20.9x 12.7x
P/S 0.7x 2.8x
P/B 4.6x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 9.8x
EV/EBIT 9.2x 11.7x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.9x
EV/FCF 15.5x 18.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.2x 12.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFSLAUR
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.9% 17.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.8% 18.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.1% 18.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% 25.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 47.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 13.2% 32.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 53.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -48.2% 39.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 24.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -43.8% 25.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFSLAUR
Gross margin 31.1% 27.3%
EBITDA margin 6.5% 29.1%
Operating margin 5.4% 24.4%
Pretax margin 5.6% 24.2%
Net margin 3.8% 17.6%
FCF margin 3.2% 15.7%
Operating cash flow margin 3.3% 22.3%
Return on equity 25.6% 29.4%
Return on assets 10.3% 13.7%
Return on invested capital 22.6% 24.7%
Return on capital employed 26.8% 24.3%
Asset turnover 2.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFSLAUR
Debt / assets 3.7% 9.2%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.9x 0.1x
Debt / FCF 0.4x 0.8x
Liabilities / assets 61.0% 52.9%
Equity / assets 39.0% 47.1%
Interest coverage 52.8x 35.9x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 5.35 3.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFSLAUR
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – 6.4%
Shareholder yield – 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFSLAUR
Forward P/E – 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +16.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +17.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -4.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFSLAUR
Held by institutions – 95.8%
Institutions holding – 337
Change in shares held, QoQ – -3.3%
Institutions buying – 161
Institutions selling – 144
Buyers to sellers – 1.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFSLAUR
LFS 1.00 0.03
LAUR 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFS and LAUR?

Laureate Education (LAUR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Leifras (LFS) $53.15M, Laureate Education (LAUR) $5.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, LFS and LAUR?

Laureate Education (LAUR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Leifras (LFS) 17.5x, Laureate Education (LAUR) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Laureate Education (LAUR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Leifras (LFS) +6.9%, Laureate Education (LAUR) +17.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Laureate Education (LAUR) has the highest net margin (Leifras (LFS) 3.8%, Laureate Education (LAUR) 17.6%). On return on invested capital, Laureate Education (LAUR) leads (Leifras (LFS) 22.6%, Laureate Education (LAUR) 24.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Laureate Education (LAUR) returned the most: Leifras (LFS) -30.7%, Laureate Education (LAUR) +25.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Laureate Education (LAUR) has been the steadiest (Leifras (LFS) 248.1%, Laureate Education (LAUR) 33.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LFS and LAUR move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.03, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LFS and LAUR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Laureate Education (LAUR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.