GNRC vs FPS vs HWM Stock Comparison

Generac Holdings, Forgent Power Solutions and Howmet Aerospace Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CAT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GNRC Generac Holdings Inc.
$203.37 -4.2% 1M +12.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.49B
P/E
38.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.62B
Div. yield
–
Power Equipment Industrials
2 wins
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$205.71 -10.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$79.38B
P/E
38.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.73B
Div. yield
0.00%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Howmet Aerospace leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Howmet Aerospace 5, Generac Holdings 2, Forgent Power Solutions 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGNRCFPSHWMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.49B $6.24B $79.38B HWM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.2x 84.3x 38.7x GNRC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x 20.4x 39.6x FPS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% — +22.0% HWM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 21.1% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 21.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.4% — +1.1% GNRC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.4%/yr — +47.3%/yr HWM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.0% 91.1% 35.5% HWM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 — 73/100 HWM

Percentile Scorecard

GNRCFPSHWM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGNRCFPSHWM
Valuation 61 #25 of 62 5 #193 of 203 40 #60 of 100
Growth 40 #36 of 59 – 90 #11 of 96
Profitability 87 #8 of 55 – 99 #2 of 95
Financial Health 48 #38 of 72 20 #174 of 216 47 #56 of 105
Shareholder Returns – – 88 #9 of 65
Overall 59 – 73
  • GNRC ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • FPS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HWM ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGNRCFPSHWMSPY
1 month -4.2%-23.8%-10.9% +0.7%
3 months +6.0%-14.9%-25.8% +3.7%
6 months -21.5%-24.7%-15.4% +7.1%
Year to date +49.1%—+0.3% +12.8%
1 year +12.4%—+1.1% +11.9%
3 years +147.3%—+371.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +35.3%—+67.8% +22.8%
5 years -59.2%—+592.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year -16.4%—+47.3% +10.9%
10 years +430.4%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +18.2%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGNRCFPSHWMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.0%91.1%35.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.7%90.5%36.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.183.631.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.22—0.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.7%-62.5%-36.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.2%-56.1%-29.7% -1.2%
52-week high $295.54$64.59$292.71 $779.14
52-week low $136.37$24.22$185.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGNRCFPSHWM
P/E now vs peer median 39.7xmedian 26.6x 84.3xmedian 25.8x 39.9xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.6x 5.5xmedian 1.9x 8.4xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.9x —median 14.6x 28.2xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.0xmedian 30.1x -1,140xmedian 22.2x 42.4xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 1.9x 11.6xmedian 2.2x 14.2xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 2.16median 0.97 —median 1.45 0.81median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGNRCFPSHWM
Revenue $4.62B – $9.73B
Gross profit $1.84B – $3.56B
Operating income $478.99M – $2.73B
Net income $301.14M – $2.05B
Free cash flow – – $1.93B
R&D $253.28M – $38.00M
EPS (diluted) $5.05 – $5.13
Cash & equivalents $393.67M $97.48M $507.00M
Total debt – $582.18M $4.83B
Shares (diluted) 59.64M 243.80M 400.00M
Enterprise value $11.49B $6.24B $75.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGNRCFPSHWM
P/E 39.7x 84.3x 39.9x
P/FCF 33.0x -1,140x 42.4x
P/Operating cash flow 20.0x – 34.1x
P/S 2.6x 5.5x 8.4x
P/B 4.0x 11.6x 14.2x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 20.4x 16.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 28.2x
EV/EBIT – – 31.6x
EV/Revenue 2.6x – 8.9x
EV/FCF – – 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.0x – 35.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.16 – 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGNRCFPSHWM
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% – 22.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.8% – 14.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.4% – 33.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.8% – 26.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.5% – 36.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.8% – 35.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.6% – 41.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% – 47.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -0.9% – 43.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.4% – 49.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 2.1% – 40.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.3% – 38.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 50.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 41.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGNRCFPSHWM
Gross margin – – 36.6%
EBITDA margin – – 31.4%
Operating margin – – 28.1%
Pretax margin – – 25.8%
Net margin – – 21.1%
FCF margin – – 19.8%
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% – 24.7%
Return on equity 10.2% – 35.7%
Return on assets 5.1% – 15.5%
Return on invested capital – – 21.5%
Return on capital employed – – 24.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGNRCFPSHWM
Debt / assets – 26.1% 36.4%
Debt / equity – 0.9x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.4x
Debt / FCF – – 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 50.9% 69.9% 56.6%
Equity / assets 49.1% 30.1% 43.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.5x 1.9x
Quick ratio – 1.0x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 8.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGNRCFPSHWM
Dividend yield – – 0.2%
Net buyback yield – – 1.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 10.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 23.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 43.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGNRCFPSHWM
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 20.4xFY2027 39.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.31FY2026 $1.39FY2027 $5.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.8%FY2026 +104.4%FY2027 +37.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +42.0% +53.2% +31.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.60BFY2026 $2.41BFY2027 $10.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.1%FY2026 +69.5%FY2027 +25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +48.6% +38.0% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGNRCFPSHWM
Held by institutions 89.4% 64.9% 91.0%
Institutions holding 999 370 1,601
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% +46.0% +0.7%
Institutions buying 532 297 908
Institutions selling 321 63 484
Buyers to sellers 1.66 4.71 1.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GNRCFPSHWM
GNRC 1.00 0.63 0.28
FPS 0.63 1.00 0.33
HWM 0.28 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GNRC, FPS and HWM?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Generac Holdings (GNRC) $11.49B, Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) $6.24B, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) $79.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, GNRC, FPS and HWM?

Generac Holdings (GNRC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Generac Holdings (GNRC) 38.2x, Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) 84.3x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 38.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) is cheapest (Generac Holdings (GNRC) 21.8x, Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) 20.4x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 39.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Generac Holdings (GNRC) +6.1%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +22.0%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Generac Holdings (GNRC) returned the most: Generac Holdings (GNRC) +12.4%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +1.1%. Over five years, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) compounded fastest (Generac Holdings (GNRC) -16.4%/yr, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +47.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Generac Holdings (GNRC) 0.00%, Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) 0.00%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 0.00%. Generac Holdings (GNRC) and Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has been the steadiest (Generac Holdings (GNRC) 57.0%, Forgent Power Solutions (FPS) 91.1%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 35.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GNRC, FPS and HWM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.