TH International
NASDAQ: THCH
$1.65 ▲ +0.03  (+1.85%)
At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 4:00 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap54.63 Mn
P/E-0.79
P/S0.30
Div. Yield0.00
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-10.19
Add ratio to table…

About

TH International Ltd is an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands on April 25 2018 with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands. The company operates as the parent entity of the master franchisee that holds the right to operate Tim Hortons coffee shops in mainland China Hong Kong and Macau. As of the date of the annual report TH International Ltd does not own any stores outside mainland China. It was founded by affiliates of Cartesian and THRI the…

Read more ↓
Sector: Consumer Cyclical Industry: Restaurants CIK: 0001877333

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • The company reported system sales growth of 12.8% year over year in Q3 FY25 driven by a 3.3% increase in same store sales for company owned and operated stores and a 25.0% year over year rise in franchised and retail business revenues. Food revenues surged 24.2% year over year pushing food’s share of total sales to a historic high of 36.5% up five percentage points from the prior year. This shift toward higher margin food offerings is supported by the successful launch of the Light & Fit Lunch Box platform and the continued expansion of the Coffee Plus Freshly Prepared Food strategy which together have made food present in more than half of all orders. The loyalty program now counts 27.9 million members a 22.3% year over year increase with an average of over 27 000 members per store providing a strong base for repeat visits and higher basket size. These trends suggest the market is underestimating the upside from a maturing food centric model that can drive both traffic and margin expansion as the mix of food continues to rise.
  • The sub franchisee network continues to scale rapidly with over 8 400 applications received since the individual franchise program launched in December 2023 and more than 300 stores converted by end of September 2025. Sub franchisee unit economics remain attractive with an average payback period of two to three years indicating a low capital barrier for partners and a steady cash flow stream for the company. In addition the company operates 64 special channel stores located in high speed train stations airports highway rest areas hospitals universities and schools which have consistently generated store contribution margins in the mid to high teens EBITDA range and a payback period of approximately two years. The success of these high traffic locations has sparked strong interest from additional franchisees who desire access to such channels and the company notes there are tens of thousands of similar venues nationwide offering a long runway for expansion. This combination of a proven franchise model and high performing special channel assets represents a hidden catalyst that could accelerate store count growth while preserving capital efficiency.
  • The completion of the USD 89.9 million senior secured convertible note issuance in Q3 FY25 allowed the company to repurchase all outstanding variable rate convertible senior notes due 2026 and extend the maturity of its 2024 unsecured convertible notes to September 2029. As a result the company now has no near term offshore liabilities which frees management to focus on operational execution rather than debt refinancing. The restructuring is expected to materially lower the on shore leverage ratio making it easier to obtain additional bank facilities from PRC commercial banks for store renewal and expansion. Management also highlighted ongoing efforts to secure alternative debt or equity financing to support the company owned and operated store network while anticipating that improving store and corporate level margins will generate positive operating cash inflows and increase self sustainability. These financing moves reduce near term liquidity risk and create a clearer path to fund growth initiatives without excessive dilution.
  • Margin improvement initiatives are already underway and are likely to deliver double digit store level margins in the near future. The company plans to enhance gross margins through supply chain optimization higher pricing on delivery platforms the launch of high margin new products and recipe optimization of core offerings. Delivery costs as a percentage of company owned and operated store revenues rose to 13.2% in Q3 FY25 but management views this increase as temporary due to aggressive platform subsidies and expects to mitigate it through better pricing mix and cost controls. Adjusted general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 13.2% from 10.7% driven by outside service fees credit loss and other items but the company is actively managing these costs while maintaining investment in growth. Digital orders now represent 91.0% of total orders up from 86.6% a year ago reflecting stronger capability to serve delivery and takeaway demand which should improve operating leverage. With these actions in place the company targets mid to high teens store contribution margins over the next fiscal year signalling that the market may be underestimating the profitability upside from ongoing operational discipline.
▼ Bear case
  • Store level profitability remains under pressure as evidenced by the rise in delivery costs as a percentage of company owned and operated store revenues which increased by 2.9 percentage points to 13.2% in Q3 FY25 compared to 10.3% in the prior year period. This increase was driven by a higher delivery revenue mix stemming from promotional subsidies offered by third party platforms and if those subsidies were to retreat the company could face a structural increase in its cost base that would erode margins. At the same time food and packaging costs as a percentage of company owned and operated store revenues rose by 1.6 percentage points to 30.6% reflecting higher input costs or discounting pressure. The company acknowledged that the lower store contribution margin in Q3 was mostly because of the higher delivery revenue mix and while it views this as a temporary play any prolonged reliance on discounted delivery orders could keep store level margins subdued. Investors should watch for any reversal in platform incentives that could expose the business to higher variable costs without a commensurate increase in prices.
  • Adjusted general and administrative expenses grew 23.2% year over year in Q3 FY25 causing the adjusted G&A to total revenue ratio to jump from 10.7% to 13.2%. This increase was primarily due to higher outside service fees related to audit IT and business travel an increase in credit loss on accounts receivable and only partially offset by lower headquarters staff compensation and reduced depreciation and amortization. The rising cost base indicates that overhead is expanding faster than revenue growth which could limit the company’s ability to convert top line gains into bottom line improvement. If the trend continues the company may need to implement more aggressive cost containment measures that could hinder investment in growth initiatives such as new store openings or product development. The market may be ignoring the risk that SG&A pressures will persist as the company scales its digital and delivery infrastructure.
  • Adjusted corporate EBITDA margin turned negative at 4.2% in Q3 FY25 compared to a positive 0.6% in the same quarter of the prior year reflecting that the company is still operating at a loss on an adjusted basis despite improvements in system sales and same store sales. Management highlighted that adjusted corporate EBITDA and adjusted net loss were cut by 10.4% and 11.5% respectively but the underlying profitability remains elusive. The company’s path to profitability relies on achieving higher store level margins and leveraging its franchise and special channel assets yet there is no guarantee that these initiatives will generate sufficient cash flow to cover fixed costs and interest expenses in the near term. Continued reliance on external financing to fund operations could increase financial risk especially if market conditions tighten or if the expected margin expansion does not materialize as planned.
  • Competitive intensity in the Chinese beverage market is rising as leading tea brands have begun entering the coffee space and consumers exhibit heightened price sensitivity during periods of high temperature. The company noted that the coffee sector faces intensified competitive pressure from rapidly expanding tea beverage categories not only due to strong demand for non coffee alternatives but also because tea brands are actively competing for coffee drinkers wallet share. To counter this Tims China has deployed a dual check approach of premium coffee offerings and non coffee SKUs aimed at tea drinkers but such strategies require sustained marketing spend and innovation cycles. The company’s reliance on promotional activities such as the celebrity partnership during the Bagel Festival and seasonal lunchbox drives may not be sustainable if competitors match or exceed these efforts leading to margin dilution. Furthermore the closure of underperforming stores indicates that certain locations may not be viable in the long run raising concerns about market saturation and the need for continual store portfolio optimization which could cap growth prospects.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Restaurants
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 SBUX Starbucks Corp 118.28 Bn79.083.0715.08 Bn
2 YUM Yum Brands Inc 41.26 Bn23.744.8611.95 Bn
3 CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc 41.21 Bn28.383.40-
4 QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. 25.26 Bn26.452.6313.30 Bn
5 DRI Darden Restaurants Inc 22.64 Bn-5,264.331.772.43 Bn
6 YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc. 15.35 Bn15.431.270.02 Bn
7 TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 12.76 Bn30.712.100.05 Bn
8 DPZ Dominos Pizza Inc 11.11 Bn14.992.214.88 Bn