SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Sector: Basic Materials Industry: Coking Coal CIK: 0001514705

Market Cap 771.26 Mn

P/E -11.70

P/S 0.42

Div. Yield 0.04

ROIC (Qtr) 0.00

Total Debt (Qtr) 659.90 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr) 4.38

Add ratio to table...

About

SunCoke Energy, Inc. is the largest independent producer of high quality coke in the Americas measured by annual tons of coke produced. The company operates five cokemaking facilities in the United States and one facility in Brazil under agreement with ArcelorMittal Brazil. In addition it runs an industrial services business that provides material handling mixing and logistics services for coal coke steel power and other bulk customers. SunCoke Energy, Inc. serves the steelmaking industry by supplying coke as a raw material for blast furnaces and...

SunCoke Energy, Inc. is the largest independent producer of high quality coke in the Americas measured by annual tons of coke produced. The company operates five cokemaking facilities in the United States and one facility in Brazil under agreement with ArcelorMittal Brazil. In addition it runs an industrial services business that provides material handling mixing and logistics services for coal coke steel power and other bulk customers. SunCoke Energy, Inc. serves the steelmaking industry by supplying coke as a raw material for blast furnaces and foundry operations.

The company generates revenue primarily from the sale of blast furnace coke and foundry coke under long term take or pay agreements with steel producers. It also sells noncontracted coke into spot and export markets. Revenue from the industrial services segment comes from fees for material handling mixing transloading storage and slag handling services provided on a per ton basis.

The company operates through the following segments: Domestic Coke and Industrial Services.

• Domestic Coke includes the company’s owned and operated cokemaking facilities in Indiana Harbor Granite City Jewell Haverhill and Middletown which produce blast furnace coke using heat recovery technology that captures waste heat to generate steam and electricity for sale. The segment also produces foundry coke at the Jewell plant and sells steam and electricity generated from the cokemaking process.

• Industrial Services provides material handling mixing transloading and storage services at terminals such as Convent Marine Terminal Kanawha River Terminal and Lake Terminal as well as on site slag handling scrap processing and mill services at numerous locations in the United States Brazil Slovakia and Spain.

SunCoke Energy, Inc. is the largest independent coke producer in the Americas and holds about 38 percent of the U. S. blast furnace coke market capacity. Its competitors include merchant coke producers from countries such as China Colombia and Indonesia as well as captive coke plants owned by integrated steel companies. Competitive advantages stem from its proprietary heat recovery technology which yields higher quality coke lower emissions and the ability to sell generated steam and electricity. The company’s long term take or pay contracts provide stable cash flows and reduce exposure to spot price volatility.

The company’s customers include major steel producers such as Cleveland Cliffs Steel Holding Corporation Cleveland Cliffs Steel LLC collectively referred to as Cliffs Steel United States Steel Corporation and Algoma Steel Inc. It also supplies coke to ArcelorMittal Brazil under operating agreements. Industrial services customers comprise steel mills coal producers power generators and other bulk material handlers across North America and internationally.

Investment thesis

Bull case

The recent acquisition of Phoenix Global has already added nearly twelve million dollars of adjusted EBITDA in 2025, with management projecting an additional sixty million in 2026. This incremental contribution represents a clear upside that has not yet been fully priced in by the market, given the current guidance range of $230 to $250 million for consolidated adjusted EBITDA. The integration is proceeding without the major roadblocks that often accompany acquisitions, as evidenced by the minimal one‑time integration costs disclosed in the earnings call. Over the next two years Phoenix is expected to generate synergies that will further lift earnings, creating a more robust platform for future growth.
The permanent shutdown of Haverhill One, while reducing capacity, removes a low‑margin segment and frees up resources that can be redeployed into higher‑margin operations. Management highlighted that the facility was a significant drag on profitability, and its closure allows the company to focus on its most efficient plants. With the revised domestic coke capacity of 3.7 million blast furnace equivalent tons, the company can operate at full utilization and sell out for the year, which should translate into higher gross margins. This operational streamlining is a catalyst that has not yet been fully reflected in valuation multiples.
Several long‑term contracts have been extended, notably the Granite City coke‑making agreement with U.S. Steel and the Haverhill II contract with Cleveland‑Cliffs, both at comparable economics to prior terms. These take‑or‑pay agreements provide revenue certainty and mitigate commodity price swings, which is attractive to investors seeking stable cash flows. The contract extensions also secure the company’s position as a preferred supplier in key domestic steel markets, reinforcing its competitive moat. Management’s confidence in maintaining these contracts suggests that the firm will continue to capture a stable market share.
The company’s liquidity position remains strong, with $88.7 million in cash and $132 million available on its revolver, giving a total liquidity cushion of approximately $221 million. Management has set a gross leverage target of 2.45x for 2026, comfortably below the long‑term goal of 3x, indicating a disciplined deleveraging strategy. This financial flexibility allows the firm to weather operational disruptions and to invest in growth opportunities such as further terminal expansions or potential acquisitions. The ability to use excess cash flow for dividends or share repurchases could enhance shareholder value over time.
The industrial services segment, which includes logistics terminals and slag removal services, is expected to see a recovery in terminal handling volumes as market conditions improve. Management cited an anticipated volume of 24 million tons for 2026, up from 22.5 million tons in 2025, implying a rebound in service demand. This upside is supported by new contracts and an expanded customer base, indicating that the company is well positioned to capture market share in a recovering steel industry. The industrial services growth therefore represents a hidden catalyst that may not yet be fully priced.

The recent acquisition of Phoenix Global has already added nearly twelve million dollars of adjusted EBITDA in 2025, with management projecting an additional sixty million in 2026. This incremental contribution represents a clear upside that has not yet been fully priced in by the market, given the current guidance range of $230 to $250 million for consolidated adjusted EBITDA. The integration is proceeding without the major roadblocks that often accompany acquisitions, as evidenced by the minimal one‑time integration costs disclosed in the earnings call. Over the next two years Phoenix is expected to generate synergies that will further lift earnings, creating a more robust platform for future growth.
The permanent shutdown of Haverhill One, while reducing capacity, removes a low‑margin segment and frees up resources that can be redeployed into higher‑margin operations. Management highlighted that the facility was a significant drag on profitability, and its closure allows the company to focus on its most efficient plants. With the revised domestic coke capacity of 3.7 million blast furnace equivalent tons, the company can operate at full utilization and sell out for the year, which should translate into higher gross margins. This operational streamlining is a catalyst that has not yet been fully reflected in valuation multiples.
Several long‑term contracts have been extended, notably the Granite City coke‑making agreement with U.S. Steel and the Haverhill II contract with Cleveland‑Cliffs, both at comparable economics to prior terms. These take‑or‑pay agreements provide revenue certainty and mitigate commodity price swings, which is attractive to investors seeking stable cash flows. The contract extensions also secure the company’s position as a preferred supplier in key domestic steel markets, reinforcing its competitive moat. Management’s confidence in maintaining these contracts suggests that the firm will continue to capture a stable market share.
The company’s liquidity position remains strong, with $88.7 million in cash and $132 million available on its revolver, giving a total liquidity cushion of approximately $221 million. Management has set a gross leverage target of 2.45x for 2026, comfortably below the long‑term goal of 3x, indicating a disciplined deleveraging strategy. This financial flexibility allows the firm to weather operational disruptions and to invest in growth opportunities such as further terminal expansions or potential acquisitions. The ability to use excess cash flow for dividends or share repurchases could enhance shareholder value over time.
The industrial services segment, which includes logistics terminals and slag removal services, is expected to see a recovery in terminal handling volumes as market conditions improve. Management cited an anticipated volume of 24 million tons for 2026, up from 22.5 million tons in 2025, implying a rebound in service demand. This upside is supported by new contracts and an expanded customer base, indicating that the company is well positioned to capture market share in a recovering steel industry. The industrial services growth therefore represents a hidden catalyst that may not yet be fully priced.

Bear case

The Algoma contract breach continues to pose a significant and unresolved risk. Although management asserts a favorable legal position, the ongoing arbitration and potential litigation costs have already inflicted a $30 million negative cash impact in 2025, and there is no certainty that the outcome will be favorable. If the company cannot recover the full value of the breach, it could face substantial losses that would erode earnings and free cash flow in 2026 and beyond. This legal uncertainty should be factored into any valuation model.
The closure of Haverhill One eliminates approximately 500,000 tons of domestic coke production, which could constrain the firm’s ability to meet unexpected spikes in demand, particularly if steel production rebounds faster than anticipated. While the company views the shutdown as a cost‑saving measure, it also reduces production flexibility and could lead to missed revenue opportunities if market conditions improve sooner than expected. This capacity constraint is a structural risk that may limit upside potential.
Integration of Phoenix Global carries hidden integration risks that may not yet have fully manifested. The acquisition involved significant transaction and restructuring costs, and there were site closure costs associated with Phoenix operations. Potential IT integration challenges, cultural mismatches, and supply chain alignment issues could result in cost overruns or operational disruptions. If integration stalls, the expected EBITDA contribution of $60 million in 2026 may not be realized, undermining the company’s growth narrative.
Weather‑related disruptions, such as the Middletown turbine failure and severe winter weather, have already impacted cash flows in 2025 and are projected to affect 2026. These events illustrate the company’s exposure to operational volatility and the potential for recurring power generation interruptions. While management estimates a $10 million first‑quarter impact for 2026, additional unforeseen events could further erode operating cash flow, challenging the company’s ability to maintain dividend payments and debt service.
The industrial services segment remains heavily dependent on terminal handling volumes, which have been depressed by weak market conditions. Management projects a modest recovery, but terminal volumes are still lower than 2025 levels. If the terminal market continues to underperform, the expected $90 million to $100 million adjusted EBITDA contribution for 2026 may be overstated, directly impacting overall profitability. The segment’s cyclical nature adds to the firm’s earnings volatility.

The Algoma contract breach continues to pose a significant and unresolved risk. Although management asserts a favorable legal position, the ongoing arbitration and potential litigation costs have already inflicted a $30 million negative cash impact in 2025, and there is no certainty that the outcome will be favorable. If the company cannot recover the full value of the breach, it could face substantial losses that would erode earnings and free cash flow in 2026 and beyond. This legal uncertainty should be factored into any valuation model.
The closure of Haverhill One eliminates approximately 500,000 tons of domestic coke production, which could constrain the firm’s ability to meet unexpected spikes in demand, particularly if steel production rebounds faster than anticipated. While the company views the shutdown as a cost‑saving measure, it also reduces production flexibility and could lead to missed revenue opportunities if market conditions improve sooner than expected. This capacity constraint is a structural risk that may limit upside potential.
Integration of Phoenix Global carries hidden integration risks that may not yet have fully manifested. The acquisition involved significant transaction and restructuring costs, and there were site closure costs associated with Phoenix operations. Potential IT integration challenges, cultural mismatches, and supply chain alignment issues could result in cost overruns or operational disruptions. If integration stalls, the expected EBITDA contribution of $60 million in 2026 may not be realized, undermining the company’s growth narrative.
Weather‑related disruptions, such as the Middletown turbine failure and severe winter weather, have already impacted cash flows in 2025 and are projected to affect 2026. These events illustrate the company’s exposure to operational volatility and the potential for recurring power generation interruptions. While management estimates a $10 million first‑quarter impact for 2026, additional unforeseen events could further erode operating cash flow, challenging the company’s ability to maintain dividend payments and debt service.
The industrial services segment remains heavily dependent on terminal handling volumes, which have been depressed by weak market conditions. Management projects a modest recovery, but terminal volumes are still lower than 2025 levels. If the terminal market continues to underperform, the expected $90 million to $100 million adjusted EBITDA contribution for 2026 may be overstated, directly impacting overall profitability. The segment’s cyclical nature adds to the firm’s earnings volatility.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Companies in the Coking Coal

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	HCC	Warrior Met Coal, Inc.	5.00 Bn	36.34	3.41	159.89 Mn
2	AMR	Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	2.48 Bn	-64.57	1.17	12.21 Mn
3	METC	Ramaco Resources, Inc.	0.82 Bn	-11.68	1.57	452.07 Mn
4	SXC	SunCoke Energy, Inc.	0.77 Bn	-11.70	0.42	659.90 Mn
5	AREC	American Resources Corp	0.23 Bn	2.92	-723.07	0.97 Mn
6	CODQL	Coronado Global Resources Inc.	-	-	-	702.88 Mn
7	METCZ	Ramaco Resources, Inc.	-	-	-	452.07 Mn
8	METCB	Ramaco Resources, Inc.	-	-	-	452.07 Mn

Research Tools

Developers

SunCoke Energy, Inc. (NYSE: SXC)

About

Investment thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Research Tools

Developers

SunCoke Energy, Inc. (NYSE: SXC)

About

Investment thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password