Quicklogic QUIK

NASDAQ QUIK

$11.87 +0.21 (+1.80%)

At close: Oct 2, 2026 · 4:00 PM EDT

Quicklogic (QUIK) stock price is $11.87, up 1.80% on the day, as of Oct 2, 2026. It has a market cap of $217.41Mn, and is classified in the Semiconductor Design industry (Technology sector).

Key Stats

Market Cap217.41 Mn

P/E-16.47

P/S13.34

Total Debt (Qtr)7.57 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)48.68

Add ratio to table…

About

QuickLogic Corporation develops programmable logic semiconductor technologies including embedded Field Programmable Gate Array intellectual property and specialized FPGA devices for applications needing adaptable hardware functionality. As a fabless semiconductor company it licenses eFPGA IP sells discrete FPGA devices and provides related development tools and software. The company generates revenue primarily from licensing its eFPGA IP to semiconductor firms that…

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

QuickLogic is building critical infrastructure in the eFPGA and radiation-hardened semiconductor markets with tangible customer adoption of its RadPro FPGA development kits, which have already shipped to multiple Defense Industrial Base (DIB) customers and contributed a low-6-figure amount to Q2 revenue. This is not merely a product launch but a strategic foothold in a high-barrier-to-entry niche where few competitors offer radiation-tolerant solutions, positioning QuickLogic as a preferred supplier for aerospace and defense programs requiring long-life-cycle reliability. The company’s internal funding of the RadPro test chip on GlobalFoundries 12LP—matching the process used by many DIBs—demonstrates technical alignment with customer requirements, reducing integration risk and accelerating the path from evaluation to production contracts. Management noted that while full DIB evaluation may extend into 2027, the current shipments represent a leading indicator of design-in momentum, with feedback expected by year-end that could transition into programs of record, creating a durable revenue stream less susceptible to short-term cyclicality.
The Intel 18A eFPGA Hard IP initiative is expanding beyond a single customer relationship into a multi-opportunity pipeline, with management confirming they are tracking “a handful of opportunities at different customers” leveraging the architectural enhancements from the 1M LUT feasibility study. These enhancements enable targeting of high-density eFPGA cores in ASIC and SoC designs, significantly expanding the serviceable addressable market (SAM) for both discrete FPGAs and chiplet-based solutions. Unlike the initial defense-focused contracts, QuickLogic is now explicitly pursuing commercial wins on Intel 18A, diversifying its customer base and reducing reliance on government funding timing. The anticipated shift of the commercial Intel 18A contract to Q3—due to customer evaluation of expanded eFPGA core size—should be viewed as a positive signal of deeper engagement and higher potential contract value, as the customer is seeking greater programmable flexibility, which aligns with QuickLogic’s value proposition of post-silicon adaptability.
QuickLogic’s storefront model is evolving from a development kit-driven revenue stream toward predictable, high-margin product shipments, with management confirming three multi-project wafer (MPW) tape outs planned for 2026—two fully customer-funded and the third at least partially so—to sell ready-to-ship devices via this channel. This shift transforms the business model from lumpy, services-heavy engagements to repeatable product sales with gross margins historically modeled in the mid-60% range, providing a more stable and scalable financial profile. The storefront approach also enables chiplet offerings, where the discrete FPGA can be paired with third-party microcontrollers, creating modular solutions that lower integration risk for customers and accelerate adoption. As the company leverages its eFPGA Hard IP in these storefront chiplets—supported by interest from partners and prior presentations at Chiplet Summit and GOMAC Tech—it is building a programmable bridge that addresses interoperability gaps in the chiplet ecosystem, a structural industry shift that could position QuickLogic as an enabler of modular semiconductor design rather than just a component supplier.
The company’s financial flexibility has been meaningfully enhanced through $6.4 million in net proceeds raised via the ATM program in Q2 and a revised $10 million credit line with lower borrowing costs, resulting in a net cash position of just under $12 million projected for Q2 close. This liquidity buffer reduces near-term financing risk and supports execution of growth initiatives without dilutive pressure, while the ATM program’s conclusion for the remainder of 2026 indicates management views current capital levels as sufficient to fund operations through year-end. Combined with a strong backlog where Q1 and guided Q2 revenue total approximately 80% of prior year revenue, QuickLogic is positioned to achieve its 50%-100% full-year growth target not through speculative optimism but through contracted and near-term executable initiatives, with second-half margin expansion driven by mix shift toward higher-margin IP and storefront devices over lower-margin professional services.

QuickLogic is building critical infrastructure in the eFPGA and radiation-hardened semiconductor markets with tangible customer adoption of its RadPro FPGA development kits, which have already shipped to multiple Defense Industrial Base (DIB) customers and contributed a low-6-figure amount to Q2 revenue. This is not merely a product launch but a strategic foothold in a high-barrier-to-entry niche where few competitors offer radiation-tolerant solutions, positioning QuickLogic as a preferred supplier for aerospace and defense programs requiring long-life-cycle reliability. The company’s internal funding of the RadPro test chip on GlobalFoundries 12LP—matching the process used by many DIBs—demonstrates technical alignment with customer requirements, reducing integration risk and accelerating the path from evaluation to production contracts. Management noted that while full DIB evaluation may extend into 2027, the current shipments represent a leading indicator of design-in momentum, with feedback expected by year-end that could transition into programs of record, creating a durable revenue stream less susceptible to short-term cyclicality.
The Intel 18A eFPGA Hard IP initiative is expanding beyond a single customer relationship into a multi-opportunity pipeline, with management confirming they are tracking “a handful of opportunities at different customers” leveraging the architectural enhancements from the 1M LUT feasibility study. These enhancements enable targeting of high-density eFPGA cores in ASIC and SoC designs, significantly expanding the serviceable addressable market (SAM) for both discrete FPGAs and chiplet-based solutions. Unlike the initial defense-focused contracts, QuickLogic is now explicitly pursuing commercial wins on Intel 18A, diversifying its customer base and reducing reliance on government funding timing. The anticipated shift of the commercial Intel 18A contract to Q3—due to customer evaluation of expanded eFPGA core size—should be viewed as a positive signal of deeper engagement and higher potential contract value, as the customer is seeking greater programmable flexibility, which aligns with QuickLogic’s value proposition of post-silicon adaptability.
QuickLogic’s storefront model is evolving from a development kit-driven revenue stream toward predictable, high-margin product shipments, with management confirming three multi-project wafer (MPW) tape outs planned for 2026—two fully customer-funded and the third at least partially so—to sell ready-to-ship devices via this channel. This shift transforms the business model from lumpy, services-heavy engagements to repeatable product sales with gross margins historically modeled in the mid-60% range, providing a more stable and scalable financial profile. The storefront approach also enables chiplet offerings, where the discrete FPGA can be paired with third-party microcontrollers, creating modular solutions that lower integration risk for customers and accelerate adoption. As the company leverages its eFPGA Hard IP in these storefront chiplets—supported by interest from partners and prior presentations at Chiplet Summit and GOMAC Tech—it is building a programmable bridge that addresses interoperability gaps in the chiplet ecosystem, a structural industry shift that could position QuickLogic as an enabler of modular semiconductor design rather than just a component supplier.
The company’s financial flexibility has been meaningfully enhanced through $6.4 million in net proceeds raised via the ATM program in Q2 and a revised $10 million credit line with lower borrowing costs, resulting in a net cash position of just under $12 million projected for Q2 close. This liquidity buffer reduces near-term financing risk and supports execution of growth initiatives without dilutive pressure, while the ATM program’s conclusion for the remainder of 2026 indicates management views current capital levels as sufficient to fund operations through year-end. Combined with a strong backlog where Q1 and guided Q2 revenue total approximately 80% of prior year revenue, QuickLogic is positioned to achieve its 50%-100% full-year growth target not through speculative optimism but through contracted and near-term executable initiatives, with second-half margin expansion driven by mix shift toward higher-margin IP and storefront devices over lower-margin professional services.

▼ Bear case

QuickLogic’s gross margin expansion to the modeled 57% for full-year 2026 hinges on a significant shift in revenue mix toward higher-margin IP and products, yet the company offered no concrete evidence during the Q&A that this transition is accelerating beyond historical patterns, with Elias Nader’s explanation relying on a vague assertion that “there is going to be more higher gross margin mix in the second half” without specifying contractual drivers, customer commitments, or quantifiable milestones. The Q1 gross margin shortfall to 39.6%—well below the 45% ±5% outlook—was attributed to $298,000 in inventory reserves, a figure that remains opaque in terms of root cause (e.g., overproduction, obsolescence, or valuation adjustments) and raises concerns about inventory management discipline, especially given that mature product revenue declined sequentially by 14.2% despite 31.7% year-over-year growth, suggesting potential misalignment between production and demand.
The company’s dependence on a single major customer for Intel 18A progress introduces concentration risk, as four of the five discussed Intel 18A contracts—totaling nearly $2 million—are with one DIB customer, and the anticipated mid-6-figure fifth contract and the several-million-dollar commercial contract are also tied to this same entity. While management noted they are tracking “a handful of opportunities at different customers,” they provided no names, stages, or timelines for these additional prospects, leaving unanswered whether the architectural enhancements from the 1M LUT study are generating broad market interest or remain confined to one strategic relationship. The delay of the commercial Intel 18A contract from late Q2 to Q3, framed as positive due to customer evaluation of expanded functionality, could alternatively signal hesitation or scope creep that increases execution risk and delays revenue recognition, particularly given the customer’s history of revising specifications (e.g., eFPGA core size) that may impact tape-out schedules and NRE recovery.
The storefront model’s projected margin expansion to mid-60% relies on the assumption that revenue recognition will shift from services-heavy engagements to pure product sales, yet QuickLogic continues to classify certain labor and tooling costs for IP contracts as COGS—a practice Elias Nader acknowledged may cause variability in gross margins—and the company has not clarified whether storefront shipments will truly avoid such classifications or if they will remain entangled in hybrid revenue streams involving NRE, integration support, or chiplet customization. Furthermore, the plan to leverage the discrete FPGA as a chiplet in parallel with the evaluation kit remains exploratory, with Andy Jaros noting only “interest from some partners” and no binding agreements, term sheets, or revenue commitments disclosed, making the chiplet-driven storefront expansion a speculative overlay rather than a near-term catalyst.
QuickLogic’s cash position, while strengthened by the $6.4 million ATM raise, remains vulnerable to execution delays in its largest near-term contracts, including the seven-figure DIB deal finalized last week that will contribute to Q2 revenue but whose evaluation kit is not scheduled until late 2026, meaning revenue recognition is ratable and extends through Q1 2027—effectively deferring cash conversion despite near-term revenue recognition. The company’s guidance for Q2 non-GAAP net loss of approximately $800,000 implies continued quarterly cash burn, and while Elias Nader stated they do not anticipate further ATM sales for the remainder of 2026, this assumes no material deterioration in operating performance; if Q2 revenue misses the $6 million ±10% guidance or operating expenses exceed the $3.3 million ±5% range due to unanticipated NRE tooling or IP development costs, the net cash position could erode quickly, especially given the reduced $10 million credit line that limits borrowing flexibility as a buffer.

QuickLogic’s gross margin expansion to the modeled 57% for full-year 2026 hinges on a significant shift in revenue mix toward higher-margin IP and products, yet the company offered no concrete evidence during the Q&A that this transition is accelerating beyond historical patterns, with Elias Nader’s explanation relying on a vague assertion that “there is going to be more higher gross margin mix in the second half” without specifying contractual drivers, customer commitments, or quantifiable milestones. The Q1 gross margin shortfall to 39.6%—well below the 45% ±5% outlook—was attributed to $298,000 in inventory reserves, a figure that remains opaque in terms of root cause (e.g., overproduction, obsolescence, or valuation adjustments) and raises concerns about inventory management discipline, especially given that mature product revenue declined sequentially by 14.2% despite 31.7% year-over-year growth, suggesting potential misalignment between production and demand.
The company’s dependence on a single major customer for Intel 18A progress introduces concentration risk, as four of the five discussed Intel 18A contracts—totaling nearly $2 million—are with one DIB customer, and the anticipated mid-6-figure fifth contract and the several-million-dollar commercial contract are also tied to this same entity. While management noted they are tracking “a handful of opportunities at different customers,” they provided no names, stages, or timelines for these additional prospects, leaving unanswered whether the architectural enhancements from the 1M LUT study are generating broad market interest or remain confined to one strategic relationship. The delay of the commercial Intel 18A contract from late Q2 to Q3, framed as positive due to customer evaluation of expanded functionality, could alternatively signal hesitation or scope creep that increases execution risk and delays revenue recognition, particularly given the customer’s history of revising specifications (e.g., eFPGA core size) that may impact tape-out schedules and NRE recovery.
The storefront model’s projected margin expansion to mid-60% relies on the assumption that revenue recognition will shift from services-heavy engagements to pure product sales, yet QuickLogic continues to classify certain labor and tooling costs for IP contracts as COGS—a practice Elias Nader acknowledged may cause variability in gross margins—and the company has not clarified whether storefront shipments will truly avoid such classifications or if they will remain entangled in hybrid revenue streams involving NRE, integration support, or chiplet customization. Furthermore, the plan to leverage the discrete FPGA as a chiplet in parallel with the evaluation kit remains exploratory, with Andy Jaros noting only “interest from some partners” and no binding agreements, term sheets, or revenue commitments disclosed, making the chiplet-driven storefront expansion a speculative overlay rather than a near-term catalyst.
QuickLogic’s cash position, while strengthened by the $6.4 million ATM raise, remains vulnerable to execution delays in its largest near-term contracts, including the seven-figure DIB deal finalized last week that will contribute to Q2 revenue but whose evaluation kit is not scheduled until late 2026, meaning revenue recognition is ratable and extends through Q1 2027—effectively deferring cash conversion despite near-term revenue recognition. The company’s guidance for Q2 non-GAAP net loss of approximately $800,000 implies continued quarterly cash burn, and while Elias Nader stated they do not anticipate further ATM sales for the remainder of 2026, this assumes no material deterioration in operating performance; if Q2 revenue misses the $6 million ±10% guidance or operating expenses exceed the $3.3 million ±5% range due to unanticipated NRE tooling or IP development costs, the net cash position could erode quickly, especially given the reduced $10 million credit line that limits borrowing flexibility as a buffer.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Semiconductor Design

View all peers

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	NVDA	Nvidia Corp	5,638.19 Bn	29.34	18.61	33.37 Bn
2	TSM	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd	2,452.80 Bn	33.84	17.16	6.85 Bn
3	AVGO	Broadcom Inc.	1,695.44 Bn	44.23	19.03	59.42 Bn
4	MU	Micron Technology Inc	1,213.55 Bn	24.02	13.44	5.72 Bn
5	AMD	Advanced Micro Devices Inc	1,034.54 Bn	160.79	25.05	3.23 Bn
6	ASML	Asml Holding Nv	719.69 Bn	66.32	19.17	5.11 Bn
7	INTC	Intel Corp	601.78 Bn	-53.95	10.55	50.54 Bn
8	QUIK	QUICKLOGIC Corp	0.22 Bn	-16.47	13.34	0.01 Bn

Quicklogic QUIK

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password