Old Second Bancorp
NASDAQ: OSBC
$24.01 ▲ +0.50  (+2.15%)
At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap1.26 Bn
P/E14.66
P/S56.25
Div. Yield0.01
Total Debt (Qtr)23.13 Mn
Add ratio to table…

About

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company that provides full service community banking and trust operations through its subsidiary Old Second National Bank. The bank is headquartered in Aurora Illinois and operates 55 banking centers located in Cook DeKalb DuPage Kane Kendall LaSalle and Will counties in Illinois. In addition to the bank the company owns several subsidiaries including Old Second Affordable Housing Fund LLC which offers down payment assistance…

Read more ↓
Sector: Financial Services Industry: Banks - Regional CIK: 0000357173

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • The bank’s net interest margin remains exceptionally strong at 5.14% in Q1 FY26 reflecting a 5 basis point increase quarter over linked quarter and a 26 basis point rise year over year. This stability demonstrates the balance sheet’s ability to generate attractive spreads even as the Fed cuts rates and deposit costs decline. Management highlighted that the margin is supported by a disciplined approach to pricing and a favorable mix of earning assets. The sustained NIM provides a solid foundation for continued earnings power and supports the outlook for mid‑teens return on tangible common equity.
  • Capital levels are robust with Common Equity Tier 1 at 13.13% and tangible equity ratio at 11.07% as of March 31 2026. The bank generated excess capital that allowed it to repurchase 1.2 million shares at an average price of $19.63 during Q1 FY26 adding roughly $0.01 to EPS. Management noted they are more than halfway through the existing buyback authorization and intend to refile another authorization once the current one is exhausted. This aggressive capital return combined with strong internal capital generation signals confidence in the franchise’s intrinsic value and provides a buffer against potential stress.
  • Asset quality metrics aside from a few specific credits show encouraging trends. Classified assets declined by $2.8 million during the quarter while nonperforming loans rose to $22.7 million largely due to two isolated credits. The allowance for credit losses on loans remained stable at 1.39% of total loans indicating that reserves are adequate to cover anticipated losses. Management expressed confidence that the elevated charge‑off level in the powersports book is partially a pull‑forward of seasonal losses and expects loss content to trend lower in coming quarters. The overall credit profile therefore appears to be improving beyond the headline charge‑off numbers.
  • The powersports portfolio despite higher net charge‑offs generated an 8.3% net contribution margin after charge‑offs the highest level in recent quarters. This high contribution margin reflects effective pricing on non‑endorsed products and a favorable product mix that includes higher yielding loans. Management tightened underwriting modestly but emphasized that the focus remains on maximizing net contribution margin rather than simply minimizing charge‑offs. The combination of strong margins and manageable loss trends suggests the powersports business remains a profitable engine for the bank.
  • Loan pipelines are building across commercial real estate commercial and industrial lending leasing and sponsored credit categories. Management anticipates low to mid single digit loan growth for the balance of FY26 but describes the growth as broad based with no single sector driving expectations. The pipeline strength indicates that demand is present and the bank is positioned to capture growth when market conditions improve. This broad‑based pipeline reduces reliance on any one segment and supports sustainable revenue expansion.
▼ Bear case
  • The quarter recorded $9.8 million of net loan charge‑offs driven largely by a $3.9 million commercial real estate office charge‑off and a $3.9 million powersports charge‑off. The office charge‑off stemmed from a property whose valuation fell approximately 50% below prior estimates highlighting ongoing pressure in the CRE office sector. Management acknowledged that the C&I credit related to warehousing and distribution also deteriorated due to supply chain disruption and tariff issues. These isolated but sizable losses suggest that certain segments of the portfolio remain vulnerable to macro‑economic headwinds.
  • The powersports business while generating a high contribution margin experienced a net charge‑off rate of just over 2% in Q1 FY26 which is above the bank’s historical norm. Management attributed part of the elevation to seasonality and product mix but noted that the segment remains sensitive to consumer lending softness and broader economic cycles. Any further deterioration in consumer confidence or disposable income could push charge‑offs higher and erode the profitability of this line. The reliance on a volatile consumer segment introduces earnings variability that may not be fully captured by current guidance.
  • Commercial real estate office valuations are coming in at steep discounts to prior levels and rents are declining broadly across the market. Although the bank’s office exposure is relatively small at about 3.5% of the loan book with an average loan‑to‑value of 68% the sector‑wide stress could lead to additional credit downgrades or valuation adjustments. Management indicated they are monitoring one additional non‑classified office credit and that further losses could emerge if market conditions worsen. The CRE office sector therefore represents a latent risk that could resurface despite current limited exposure.
  • Macro‑economic uncertainties including global tariff volatility and the war in Iran are explicitly factored into the bank’s loss‑rate assumptions but remain unquantified risks. These factors could suppress borrower willingness to invest in capital projects dampening loan demand especially in the commercial and industrial segment. The bank’s lending teams noted reluctance among borrowers to embark on capital expenditures due to pricing challenges and geopolitical uncertainty. Should these headwinds intensify they could curb loan growth and increase the probability of credit deterioration across multiple portfolios.
  • Loan growth guidance for the remainder of FY26 is low to mid single digit reflecting a cautious outlook that may limit upside to earnings. Management acknowledged that the first quarter was soft in both commercial and powersports lending and that pipelines are building but not yet translating into robust volume. If the expected modest growth fails to materialize the bank could rely more heavily on cost control and capital returns to sustain EPS growth. Dependence on expense discipline and buybacks rather than organic loan expansion makes the earnings trajectory more vulnerable to any misstep in expense management or capital markets.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Banks - Regional
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 KB KB Financial Group Inc. 42,090.38 Bn0.00 Bn0.01 Mn56.66 Bn
2 SHG Shinhan Financial Group Co Ltd 33,919.15 Bn0.00 Bn0.00 Mn40.46 Bn
3 BCH Bank Of Chile 4,123.52 Bn368.17 Bn1.57 Mn0.00 Bn
4 LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc 360.83 Bn0.00 Bn0.00 Mn42.37 Bn
5 FCAP First Capital Inc 204.17 Bn0.00 Bn0.03 Mn-
6 LARK Landmark Bancorp Inc 187.97 Bn0.00 Bn0.00 Mn0.00 Bn
7 NWG NatWest Group plc 144.82 Bn0.00 Bn0.00 Mn94.66 Bn
8 PNC Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. 101.80 Bn0.00 Bn0.00 Mn21.42 Bn