Nisource NI

NYSE NI
$45.31 +0.25 (+0.55%)
As of: Nov 10, 2026 · 3:59 PM EST

Nisource (NI) stock price is $45.31, up 0.55% on the day, as of Nov 10, 2026. It has a market cap of $21.54Bn and a P/E ratio of 22.83, and is classified in the Regulated Gas Utilities industry (Utilities sector).

Key Stats
Market Cap21.54 Bn
P/E22.83
FCF (Yr)-420.00 Mn
ROA (Yr)2.99
EV to EBIT11.16
Net Income (Yr)1.01 Bn
Enterprise Value21.23 Bn
Add ratio to table…

About

NiSource Inc. is an energy holding company that provides regulated natural gas and electric utility services to approximately 3.8 million customers across six states. Its principal subsidiaries include NiSource Gas Distribution Group Inc which owns local distribution companies in Ohio Pennsylvania Virginia Kentucky and Maryland and NIPSCO Holdings I which controls NIPSCO a gas and electric utility in northern Indiana. NiSource generates substantially all of its revenue from…

Read more ↓
Sector: Utilities Sector rationale NiSource operates as a regulated energy holding company that generates substantially all of its revenue from the sale of natural gas and the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity. Its business model is based on rate-regulated utility services provided to residential, commercial, and industrial customers across six states. Industries: Regulated Gas Utilities Regulated Gas Utilities Primary NiSource operates extensive regulated natural gas distribution networks through its Columbia Operations and NIPSCO Gas segments, serving approximately 3.3 million customers across six states. Its revenue is derived from the sale of natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers under a regulated rate-base model. Regulated Electric Utilities Regulated Electric Utilities Secondary Through its NIPSCO Electric subsidiary, the company generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to roughly 0.5 million customers in northern Indiana under a regulated utility framework. Classified using BQ-MICS CIK: 0001111711
Bull & bear

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • NiSource Inc. is positioned to capitalize on the accelerating demand for data center power in Northern Indiana through its innovative Genco model, which allows the company to serve hyperscaler customers like Amazon and Alphabet without exposing its regulated retail customer base to the associated costs or risks. The company has already secured approximately 800 megawatts of contracted capacity for these two customers, with an additional 3 gigawatts in strategic negotiations and line of sight to another 2 gigawatts of developing opportunities, indicating a robust pipeline that could support sustained growth well beyond current guidance. Management explicitly stated that the 9% to 10% long-term EPS CAGR guidance increase only reflects signed contracts and excludes the strategic negotiations pipeline, meaning that successful conversion of even a portion of these negotiations into contracts would provide meaningful upside to earnings growth through 2033. The Genco structure’s ability to ring-fence costs and recover investments through bilateral contracts ensures that data center initiatives contribute directly to consolidated adjusted EPS without diluting returns or increasing volatility for the core regulated business, creating a scalable and accretive growth engine. Furthermore, the company’s ability to leverage pooled resources — including advanced battery solutions and market-purchased capacity — enables rapid deployment and flexibility in meeting customer timelines, which is a critical competitive advantage in the hyperscaler market where speed to power is a key differentiator. This operational agility, combined with Indiana’s strong transmission infrastructure and proximity to major load centers like Chicago, positions NiSource to capture a disproportionate share of regional data center expansion, especially as hyperscalers prioritize locations with reliable, scalable, and quickly deployable energy solutions. The $1.4 billion in cumulative customer savings over 15 years from these partnerships not only enhances customer affordability and regulatory goodwill but also strengthens the political and social license to operate, reducing the likelihood of regulatory pushback on future investments and supporting smoother approval processes for new contracts. Finally, the company’s commitment to maintaining a strong balance sheet through a balanced funding mix — including $400 million to $600 million of annual equity issuances — ensures it has the financial flexibility to pursue incremental capital opportunities without compromising credit metrics, thereby de-risking the execution of its aggressive data center growth strategy.
▼ Bear case
  • NiSource Inc.’s ambitious data center growth strategy through the Genco model faces significant execution risks that the market may be underestimating, particularly regarding the company’s ability to convert its sizable pipeline of strategic negotiations into actual contracted capacity under favorable terms and timelines. While management cites strong demand and multiple counterparty discussions as confidence builders, the transcript reveals that the conversion of pipeline to signed contracts remains uncertain and subject to complex, time-consuming negotiations, with no guarantee that the 3 gigawatts in strategic negotiations or the additional 2 gigawatts of developing opportunities will materialize into binding agreements, especially given the capital-intensive nature of infrastructure development and the need for regulatory approvals at each stage. The company’s reliance on expedited IURC review processes — projected at 90 to 120 days post-settlement approval — introduces execution risk, as any delays in regulatory filings, stakeholder opposition, or unforeseen compliance issues (such as those arising from environmental reviews or grid interconnection studies) could push back commercial operation dates and delay the realization of earnings accretion from new contracts. Furthermore, the Genco model’s financial benefits are contingent on the company’s ability to secure appropriate risk-adjusted returns on capacity purchases and constructed assets, yet management admitted that earnings accretion is project-specific and not linear, meaning that early-stage projects may yield lower returns due to higher development costs, permitting delays, or suboptimal resource mixes, which could drag on overall segment profitability during the ramp-up phase. The Schahfer coal plant’s continued operation under a second federal order remains a material overhang, as the company explicitly stated it has no plans to shift its operating costs to data center customers via a PPA, meaning that the financial burden of maintaining this aging, carbon-intensive asset continues to fall on the regulated retail base, potentially undermining the affordability narrative central to the Genco model’s regulatory appeal and inviting scrutiny from consumer advocates or state commissions concerned about intergenerational cost shifting. Additionally, while NiSource emphasizes balance sheet strength through its ATM program and equity issuance plans, the sustained need for $400 million to $600 million in annual equity financing to support both base CapEx and data center investments raises concerns about long-term shareholder dilution, especially if the data center segment fails to generate sufficient returns to offset the dilutive impact of these issuances, potentially constraining EPS growth despite rising asset bases. Finally, the company’s dependence on hyperscaler customers like Amazon and Alphabet introduces concentration risk, as any decision by these counterparties to reduce committed capacity, terminate contracts early, or shift procurement strategies — driven by shifts in their own energy sourcing policies, renewable procurement goals, or macroeconomic downturns — could abruptly halt the expected revenue stream from Genco, leaving NiSource with stranded assets or underutilized capacity that was built under the assumption of long-term, take-or-pay commitments.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

History

Related Party Transactions By Related Party Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

History
Peer percentiles

How Nisource ranks

Ranked against the 67 companies in Regulated Utilities58 metrics · as of Nov 6, 2026

Valuation

12 metrics · Lower multiples rank higher; a negative multiple ranks last
  • P/E 22.6xMedian 20.6x 30th
  • P/FCFNegative free cash flow −13.6xMedian 33.3x 30th
  • P/Operating cash flow 8.95xMedian 9.74x 66th
  • P/S 1.82xMedian 2.89x 77th
  • P/B 1.78xMedian 1.78x 51st
  • P/Tangible book 1.78xMedian 1.80x 54th
  • EV/EBITDA 12.3xMedian 12.9x 62nd
  • EV/EBIT 20.8xMedian 20.9x 56th
  • EV/Revenue 3.38xMedian 4.77x 79th
  • EV/FCFNegative free cash flow −25.2xMedian 65.2x 36th
  • EV/Operating cash flow 16.6xMedian 16.6x 49th
  • PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.34Median 2.04 39th
Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Regulated Gas Utilities
View all peers
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 ENIC Enel Chile S.A. 299.49 Bn567.3567.640.32 Bn
2 NEE Nextera Energy Inc 179.92 Bn15.466.24110.22 Bn
3 SO Southern Co 105.56 Bn22.673.5075.58 Bn
4 DUK Duke Energy CORP 99.44 Bn19.162.9991.24 Bn
5 NGG National Grid Plc 82.69 Bn19.603.7061.59 Bn
6 AEP American Electric Power Co Inc 68.52 Bn18.072.9054.42 Bn
7 D Dominion Energy, Inc 59.67 Bn23.553.2953.42 Bn
8 NI Nisource Inc. 21.54 Bn22.831.8418.26 Bn