e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) Stock Analysis and Metrics

e.l.f. Beauty

NYSE: ELF

$83.14 ▲ +5.78 (+7.47%)

At close: Jul 27, 2026 · 3:48 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap4.84 Bn

P/E184.08

P/S2.96

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.01

Total Debt (Qtr)835.55 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)35.07

Add ratio to table…

About

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. is a multi brand beauty company that offers inclusive, accessible, clean, vegan and cruelty free cosmetics and skin care products. The company owns a portfolio of brands that includes e.l.f. Cosmetics, e.l.f. SKIN, Naturium, Well People and Keys Soulcare. Each brand focuses on different beauty needs while sharing the same commitment to high quality formulations at accessible prices. Products are distributed through physical retail stores and online channels, reaching consumers in the United States and internationally. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. emphasizes disruptive marketing, product innovation and a direct to consumer approach to differentiate itself in the beauty sector.

The company generates revenue primarily from the sale of its cosmetics and skin care products to retail partners and directly to consumers via its ecommerce website. Products are also available through third party online platforms such as Amazon. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. sells items in mass, drug, food, dollar and specialty stores as well as through its own digital storefront. The company prices its offerings below those of many mass and prestige competitors, for example e.l.f. Cosmetics averages about $6.50 per unit in the United States while comparable mass brands exceed $9.50 and prestige brands exceed $20. Marketing and digital expenses totaled $318.8 million in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, representing roughly 24% of net sales for that period. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. employs a productivity model that allows it to refresh up to 20% of its retail assortment each year, contributing to strong sales per linear foot at major retailers. As of March 31, 2025 the company had 633 full-time employees and provides an annual equity award in e.l.f. Beauty stock to every full-time worker, aligning staff interests with long-term shareholder value.

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. operates in a highly concentrated beauty industry where a few multinational corporations such as L'Oréal, Estée Lauder, Coty, Unilever, LVMH, Shiseido, Beiersdorf and Procter & Gamble control a substantial share of retail sales. Despite this concentration the company has carved out a niche by combining low price points with innovative product development and a digital first marketing strategy. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. leverages its ability to introduce new items quickly, often bringing prestige inspired concepts to mass market prices, as illustrated by the Glow Reviver Lip Oil at $8 versus a prestige alternative at $40, the Power Grip Primer at $10 versus $38 and the Bronzing Drops at $12 versus $38. The firm's strong relationships with large retailers, its own direct to consumer channel and its focus on inclusive, clean, vegan and cruelty free formulations provide competitive advantages that help it gain share among younger consumers and compete effectively against both established leaders and emerging indie brands. Recognition such as inclusion in Fast Company's list of the World's Most Innovative Companies of 2025 underscores its reputation for creativity and speed to market.

The company's customer base consists mainly of large retailers including Target, Walmart, Ulta Beauty and Amazon, which together accounted for a significant portion of net sales in the most recent fiscal year. Target, Walmart, Ulta Beauty and Amazon represented approximately 23%, 16%, 12% and 12% of net sales respectively in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. No other individual customer exceeded 10% of net sales during that period. National and international retailers combined contributed about 83% of net sales while ecommerce channels accounted for the remaining 17%. Geographically, the United States generated approximately 81% of total sales with the remaining 19% coming from international markets, primarily the United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. sells its products through mass, drug, food, dollar and specialty retail outlets as well as through its own ecommerce site and third party online platforms.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

e.l.f. Beauty's portfolio expansion into high-growth adjacencies like hair care and international markets presents a significant, underappreciated catalyst for FY27 and beyond. The Power Grip hair care launch demonstrated extraordinary elasticity, selling out in 48 hours with 95% positive sentiment and attracting 65% new-to-brand consumers, proving the brand's disruptive model transcends core cosmetics. Simultaneously, international expansion is accelerating rapidly, with Rhode launching in 19 European countries via Sephora and Naturium gaining traction in key markets like the UK and Germany, where management noted improving trends after prior promotional headwinds. Despite international sales comprising only 20% of net sales today—far below legacy peers' 70%+—the company has 50% of e.l.f. brand social followers and 74% of Rhode's followers outside the US, indicating massive untapped demand. This geographic diversification reduces reliance on the saturated US mass market while leveraging the same value-innovation-marketing engine that drove domestic success, positioning e.l.f. to capture share in underpenetrated regions where prestige brands dominate but value offerings remain scarce.
The pending tariff refund of approximately $58.5 million represents a material, non-recurring tailwind that management is not fully incorporating into FY27 guidance but could significantly boost profitability and fund growth initiatives. While the outlook assumes a 35% tariff rate and excludes potential refund impacts, the CFO confirmed these refunds would flow through P&L as a cost of goods benefit for sold inventory, directly improving gross margin. Combined with planned value-driven pricing actions—like the Halo Glow Skin Tint reduction that yielded a 38% unit lift on Amazon and triple-digit growth on TikTok Shop—the company has dual levers to reignite core e.l.f. brand growth without sacrificing margins. These initiatives target the exact pain point of slowing unit velocity, and historical precedent shows such community-led value adjustments rapidly translate to sales acceleration, suggesting current FY27 organic growth guidance of 4-5% is conservative if these strategies gain traction earlier than anticipated.
Rhode's growth trajectory remains vastly underestimated due to its severe retail under-penetration and replicable launch playbook, with substantial white space persisting even in core markets. Despite Rhode achieving #1 beauty brand status in Sephora North America and delivering ~$390 million in net sales in FY26 (80% YoY growth), it occupies less than 20% of Sephora's global stores and is just beginning its European rollout across 19 countries. Management highlighted that every Rhode launch exceeds the prior one in scale, driven by barrier-nourishing formulas and effortless routines that resonate strongly with consumers, yet the brand remains dramatically under-spaced relative to competitors—mirroring e.l.f.'s early trajectory where share gains persisted for 29 consecutive quarters. The recent expansion into Mexico and seven additional European markets, coupled with the Summer '26 Collection's IRL activations, signals accelerating global adoption, and the ability to leverage e.l.f.'s supply chain and marketing infrastructure suggests Rhode could sustain 60-80% growth for multiple years as it fills whitespace in skincare-hybrid categories where prestige players dominate but accessible alternatives are scarce.

e.l.f. Beauty's portfolio expansion into high-growth adjacencies like hair care and international markets presents a significant, underappreciated catalyst for FY27 and beyond. The Power Grip hair care launch demonstrated extraordinary elasticity, selling out in 48 hours with 95% positive sentiment and attracting 65% new-to-brand consumers, proving the brand's disruptive model transcends core cosmetics. Simultaneously, international expansion is accelerating rapidly, with Rhode launching in 19 European countries via Sephora and Naturium gaining traction in key markets like the UK and Germany, where management noted improving trends after prior promotional headwinds. Despite international sales comprising only 20% of net sales today—far below legacy peers' 70%+—the company has 50% of e.l.f. brand social followers and 74% of Rhode's followers outside the US, indicating massive untapped demand. This geographic diversification reduces reliance on the saturated US mass market while leveraging the same value-innovation-marketing engine that drove domestic success, positioning e.l.f. to capture share in underpenetrated regions where prestige brands dominate but value offerings remain scarce.
The pending tariff refund of approximately $58.5 million represents a material, non-recurring tailwind that management is not fully incorporating into FY27 guidance but could significantly boost profitability and fund growth initiatives. While the outlook assumes a 35% tariff rate and excludes potential refund impacts, the CFO confirmed these refunds would flow through P&L as a cost of goods benefit for sold inventory, directly improving gross margin. Combined with planned value-driven pricing actions—like the Halo Glow Skin Tint reduction that yielded a 38% unit lift on Amazon and triple-digit growth on TikTok Shop—the company has dual levers to reignite core e.l.f. brand growth without sacrificing margins. These initiatives target the exact pain point of slowing unit velocity, and historical precedent shows such community-led value adjustments rapidly translate to sales acceleration, suggesting current FY27 organic growth guidance of 4-5% is conservative if these strategies gain traction earlier than anticipated.
Rhode's growth trajectory remains vastly underestimated due to its severe retail under-penetration and replicable launch playbook, with substantial white space persisting even in core markets. Despite Rhode achieving #1 beauty brand status in Sephora North America and delivering ~$390 million in net sales in FY26 (80% YoY growth), it occupies less than 20% of Sephora's global stores and is just beginning its European rollout across 19 countries. Management highlighted that every Rhode launch exceeds the prior one in scale, driven by barrier-nourishing formulas and effortless routines that resonate strongly with consumers, yet the brand remains dramatically under-spaced relative to competitors—mirroring e.l.f.'s early trajectory where share gains persisted for 29 consecutive quarters. The recent expansion into Mexico and seven additional European markets, coupled with the Summer '26 Collection's IRL activations, signals accelerating global adoption, and the ability to leverage e.l.f.'s supply chain and marketing infrastructure suggests Rhode could sustain 60-80% growth for multiple years as it fills whitespace in skincare-hybrid categories where prestige players dominate but accessible alternatives are scarce.

▼ Bear case

e.l.f. Beauty's core brand is facing structural demand challenges that extend beyond temporary innovation softness, with weakening unit trends signaling potential market saturation or shifting consumer preferences in its foundational mass color cosmetics category. Despite management's emphasis on value recovery, the $1 price increase across all e.l.f. brand SKUs in August 2025 precipitated a pronounced decline in units, and recent pricing tests (e.g., Halo Glow Skin Tint from $18 to $14) only address symptoms without resolving the underlying issue of whether the brand's value proposition is eroding amid increased competition from both private labels and prestige entrants targeting the same demographic. The company itself acknowledged that e.l.f. brand global consumption moderated from high single digits to low single digits in the last 12 weeks of FY26, a trend not fully explained by innovation timing alone, especially as spring innovation still yielded two top-10 launches. This suggests the core e.l.f. franchise may be losing its edge in capturing discretionary spend among Gen Z and millennials, who are increasingly drawn to either ultra-affordable alternatives or higher-efficacy prestige skincare—threats that could constrain long-term household penetration and market share gains despite current retail space expansions.
The company's reliance on acquisitions for growth introduces significant integration and execution risks that could undermine FY27 profitability guidance, particularly as Rhode and Naturium scale while core brands stagnate. Rhode contributed approximately 34 percentage points to Q4 FY26 net sales growth, yet its integration remains incomplete, with amortization of acquired intangibles already impacting net income (evidenced by the $49.4 million GAAP loss versus $19.4 million adjusted net income in Q4) and creating a widening gap between adjusted and GAAP metrics. As Rhode annualizes in FY27, expected to contribute ~$140 million in net sales over the first four months, any slowdown in its explosive 80% YoY growth trajectory—due to replenishment challenges, retail space constraints, or waning novelty of its glazed skin trend—would disproportionately hurt overall results given its outsized role in the portfolio. Simultaneously, Naturium's growth, while strong, depends on sustaining its position as the fastest-growing top-50 skincare brand amid intensifying competition in the biocompatible skincare space, and any deceleration would leave e.l.f. Beauty overly reliant on a single acquisition-driven engine amid rising SG&A pressure from marketing and infrastructure investments.
Macroeconomic and geopolitical vulnerabilities pose material, underdiscussed threats to e.l.f. Beauty's cost structure and consumer demand that could derail FY27 margin expansion plans, particularly given the company's heavy reliance on Chinese manufacturing and exposure to volatile commodity prices. The company sources about 75% of its production from China, leaving it susceptible to renewed tariff pressures, supply chain disruptions, or labor cost inflation that could quickly erode the gross margin benefits anticipated from the current 35% tariff rate assumption. Furthermore, the CFO acknowledged incremental cost headwinds of $15-$20 million from sustained $100/barrel oil prices tied to Middle East conflicts, which directly impact transportation and petrochemical-derived ingredients—yet these were excluded from guidance due to fluidity, creating downside risk if tensions escalate. Compounding this, the company's consumer base remains highly sensitive to broader economic conditions, as evidenced by the CEO's admission that higher gas prices are exacerbating unit softness; a prolonged downturn in discretionary spending among value-conscious shoppers could stall the organic growth recovery management hopes to trigger via pricing and innovation adjustments, leaving the company vulnerable to a stagflationary scenario where input costs rise while demand falters.

e.l.f. Beauty's core brand is facing structural demand challenges that extend beyond temporary innovation softness, with weakening unit trends signaling potential market saturation or shifting consumer preferences in its foundational mass color cosmetics category. Despite management's emphasis on value recovery, the $1 price increase across all e.l.f. brand SKUs in August 2025 precipitated a pronounced decline in units, and recent pricing tests (e.g., Halo Glow Skin Tint from $18 to $14) only address symptoms without resolving the underlying issue of whether the brand's value proposition is eroding amid increased competition from both private labels and prestige entrants targeting the same demographic. The company itself acknowledged that e.l.f. brand global consumption moderated from high single digits to low single digits in the last 12 weeks of FY26, a trend not fully explained by innovation timing alone, especially as spring innovation still yielded two top-10 launches. This suggests the core e.l.f. franchise may be losing its edge in capturing discretionary spend among Gen Z and millennials, who are increasingly drawn to either ultra-affordable alternatives or higher-efficacy prestige skincare—threats that could constrain long-term household penetration and market share gains despite current retail space expansions.
The company's reliance on acquisitions for growth introduces significant integration and execution risks that could undermine FY27 profitability guidance, particularly as Rhode and Naturium scale while core brands stagnate. Rhode contributed approximately 34 percentage points to Q4 FY26 net sales growth, yet its integration remains incomplete, with amortization of acquired intangibles already impacting net income (evidenced by the $49.4 million GAAP loss versus $19.4 million adjusted net income in Q4) and creating a widening gap between adjusted and GAAP metrics. As Rhode annualizes in FY27, expected to contribute ~$140 million in net sales over the first four months, any slowdown in its explosive 80% YoY growth trajectory—due to replenishment challenges, retail space constraints, or waning novelty of its glazed skin trend—would disproportionately hurt overall results given its outsized role in the portfolio. Simultaneously, Naturium's growth, while strong, depends on sustaining its position as the fastest-growing top-50 skincare brand amid intensifying competition in the biocompatible skincare space, and any deceleration would leave e.l.f. Beauty overly reliant on a single acquisition-driven engine amid rising SG&A pressure from marketing and infrastructure investments.
Macroeconomic and geopolitical vulnerabilities pose material, underdiscussed threats to e.l.f. Beauty's cost structure and consumer demand that could derail FY27 margin expansion plans, particularly given the company's heavy reliance on Chinese manufacturing and exposure to volatile commodity prices. The company sources about 75% of its production from China, leaving it susceptible to renewed tariff pressures, supply chain disruptions, or labor cost inflation that could quickly erode the gross margin benefits anticipated from the current 35% tariff rate assumption. Furthermore, the CFO acknowledged incremental cost headwinds of $15-$20 million from sustained $100/barrel oil prices tied to Middle East conflicts, which directly impact transportation and petrochemical-derived ingredients—yet these were excluded from guidance due to fluidity, creating downside risk if tensions escalate. Compounding this, the company's consumer base remains highly sensitive to broader economic conditions, as evidenced by the CEO's admission that higher gas prices are exacerbating unit softness; a prolonged downturn in discretionary spending among value-conscious shoppers could stall the organic growth recovery management hopes to trigger via pricing and innovation adjustments, leaving the company vulnerable to a stagflationary scenario where input costs rise while demand falters.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Household & Personal Products

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	PG	PROCTER & GAMBLE Co	346.57 Bn	20.77	4.00	37.03 Bn
2	UL	Unilever Plc	134.15 Bn	28.28	4.05	32.92 Bn
3	CL	Colgate Palmolive Co	73.76 Bn	33.30	3.55	7.94 Bn
4	KVUE	Kenvue Inc.	37.38 Bn	23.05	2.44	8.66 Bn
5	KMB	Kimberly Clark Corp	37.00 Bn	92.97	2.23	7.08 Bn
6	EL	Estee Lauder Companies Inc	30.15 Bn	-157.86	2.03	7.31 Bn
7	CHD	Church & Dwight Co Inc /De/	23.41 Bn	25.02	419.55	2.40 Bn
8	CLX	Clorox Co /De/	11.83 Bn	15.36	1.75	2.49 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password