UWMC vs BSBR vs FITB Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings, Banco Santander (Brasil) and Fifth Third Bancorp Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.63 +34.7% 1M -71.2% 1Y
Market cap
$511.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$53.31 +4.5% 1M +25.4% 1Y
Market cap
$48.53B
P/E
20.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.72B
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
8 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fifth Third Bancorp leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Fifth Third Bancorp 8, Banco Santander (Brasil) 1, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCBSBRFITBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $511.82M $17.78B $48.53B FITB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.8x — 20.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.8x 7.0x 17.0x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% — +32.5% FITB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — 20.6% FITB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% — 11.1% FITB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — -0.3x FITB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -71.2% -22.1% +25.4% FITB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.4%/yr -5.3%/yr +3.9%/yr FITB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.5% 38.9% 25.2% FITB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 — 29/100 UWMC

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCBSBRFITB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCBSBRFITB
Valuation 19 #137 of 168 – 15 #307 of 360
Growth 16 #137 of 163 – 15 #293 of 344
Profitability 29 #109 of 154 – 15 #292 of 345
Financial Health 18 #133 of 161 21 #268 of 339 38 #212 of 339
Shareholder Returns 93 #11 of 136 99 #3 of 352 64 #129 of 352
Overall 35 – 29
  • UWMC ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCBSBRFITBSPY
1 month +34.7%-20.9%+4.5% -5.9%
3 months +38.1%-18.3%-6.4% -4.6%
6 months -51.8%-18.6%+7.3% +0.2%
Year to date -62.8%-22.7%+13.9% +7.5%
1 year -71.2%-22.1%+25.4% +8.2%
3 years -68.0%-16.5%+104.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year -31.6%-5.8%+26.9% +19.0%
5 years -76.9%-23.6%+20.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year -25.4%-5.3%+3.9% +9.4%
10 years —-40.2%+151.3% +251.5%
10 years, per year —-5.0%+9.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureUWMCBSBRFITBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.5%38.9%25.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.5%40.3%25.1% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.311.170.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.88-0.571.01 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-52.2%-54.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-34.4%-10.2% -5.9%
52-week high $6.10$7.20$59.36 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$4.41$41.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCBSBRFITB
P/E now vs peer median -14.8xmedian 11.9x —median 12.3x 20.1xmedian 12.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x —median 3.4x 4.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 12.1x —median 5.0x 5.5xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 5.4x —median 10.6x 17.4xmedian 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.29median 0.34 —median 1.29 -2.19median 1.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCBSBRFITB
Revenue $3.58B – $11.72B
Net income -$104.96M – $2.56B
Free cash flow -$4.92B – $2.79B
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 – $2.64
Cash & equivalents $498.41M $5.42B $4.09B
Total debt $6.02B $15.65B $18.14B
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 3.93B 917.10M
Enterprise value -$1.78B -$330.25B -$39.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFITB
P/E -14.8x – 20.1x
P/FCF -0.5x – 17.4x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x – 14.0x
P/S 0.7x – 4.1x
P/B 2.7x 1.4x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 1.9x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 15.6x – 5.5x
EV/EBIT 17.6x – 6.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x – 3.9x
EV/FCF -1.7x – 16.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x – 13.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.29 – -2.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFITB
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% – 32.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% – 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% – 6.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% – 0.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% – -21.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – -9.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% – -0.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% – -8.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% – -4.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% – -11.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFITB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% – 71.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -3.2% – 27.8%
Net margin -1.0% – 20.6%
FCF margin -137.6% – 23.8%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% – 29.5%
Return on equity -8.1% – 7.6%
Return on assets -0.6% – 0.9%
Return on invested capital 6.3% – 11.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% – 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFITB
Debt / assets 33.5% 6.3% 6.0%
Debt / equity 6.1x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x – -0.3x
Debt / FCF -1.2x – 6.5x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 90.1% 88.9%
Equity / assets 5.5% 9.9% 11.1%
Interest coverage 0.8x – 1.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCBSBRFITB
Dividend yield 18.4% 8.9% 3.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 18.4% 8.9% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCBSBRFITB
Forward P/E 14.8xFY2026 7.0xFY2026 17.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.11FY2026 $0.67FY2026 $3.13FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -8.3%FY2026 -19.3%FY2026 -11.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +81.8% +31.3% +62.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.48BFY2026 $16.53BFY2026 $12.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +3.9%FY2026 +34.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +36.4% +9.7% +23.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCBSBRFITB
Held by institutions 17.0% 14.6% 90.8%
Institutions holding 291 88 1,307
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +1.3% +3.9%
Institutions buying 214 52 692
Institutions selling 50 24 409
Buyers to sellers 4.28 2.17 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCBSBRFITB
UWMC 1.00 0.14 0.19
BSBR 0.14 1.00 0.31
FITB 0.19 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC, BSBR and FITB?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.82M, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $17.78B, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $48.53B.

Which company is growing faster?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +32.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 11.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -71.2%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -22.1%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +25.4%. Over five years, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.4%/yr, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.3%/yr, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.5%, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.9%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 25.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UWMC, BSBR and FITB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.