UWMC vs FNMA Stock Comparison

UWM Holdings and Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$475.91M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 6, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUWMCFNMALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $475.91M $24.58B FNMA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -12.8x 108.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x 1.5x FNMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% -3.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% 0.8% FNMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 2.8% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.1% -62.9% FNMA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.4%/yr +36.9%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.6% 85.8% UWMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 54/100 FNMA

Percentile Scorecard

UWMCFNMA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUWMCFNMA
Valuation 21 #135 of 170 54 #78 of 170
Growth 16 #135 of 160 86 #24 of 160
Profitability 32 #102 of 149 69 #47 of 149
Financial Health 18 #130 of 158 6 #149 of 158
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 135 –
Overall 37 54
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FNMA ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUWMCFNMASPY
1 month +13.8%-10.2% -0.8%
3 months -24.3%-30.4% +3.5%
6 months -62.6%-41.1% +7.0%
Year to date -68.0%-60.7% +12.2%
1 year -76.1%-62.9% +13.0%
3 years -71.9%+478.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -34.6%+79.5% +23.1%
5 years -79.7%+379.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.4%+36.9% +11.0%
10 years —+145.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUWMCFNMASPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.6%85.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.8%74.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.441.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.96-0.73 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-78.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.0%-64.7% -1.8%
52-week high $6.10$11.95 $779.14
52-week low $1.00$3.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUWMCFNMA
P/E now vs peer median -12.7xmedian 11.0x 109.1xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x 0.8xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 6.9x 0.6xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 0.32 0.54median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUWMCFNMA
Revenue $3.58B $29.17B
Net income -$104.96M $15.09B
Free cash flow -$4.92B $41.31B
EPS (diluted) $-0.11 $0.04
Cash & equivalents $498.41M –
Total debt $19.23B $4.19T
Shares (diluted) 337.53M 5.89B
Enterprise value -$1.82B $24.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUWMCFNMA
P/E -12.7x 109.1x
P/FCF -0.5x 0.6x
P/Operating cash flow -0.5x 0.6x
P/S 0.6x 0.8x
P/B 2.3x 0.2x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 0.2x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x –
EV/EBIT 16.8x 27.9x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 144.4x
EV/FCF -1.6x 102.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x 102.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 0.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUWMCFNMA
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% -3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) -175.0% -0.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% 6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -287.6% 22,700%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 200.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.1% 485.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.2% 16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.4% 485.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% 16.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUWMCFNMA
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin 14.6% –
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin -3.2% 64.8%
Net margin -1.0% 0.8%
FCF margin -137.6% 141.6%
Operating cash flow margin -135.9% 141.6%
Return on equity -8.1% 13.2%
Return on assets -0.6% 0.3%
Return on invested capital 6.3% 2.8%
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 46.3x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUWMCFNMA
Debt / assets 33.5% 96.7%
Debt / equity 6.1x 36.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.6x –
Debt / FCF -1.2x 101.4x
Liabilities / assets 94.5% 97.3%
Equity / assets 5.5% 2.7%
Interest coverage 0.8x 1.1x
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUWMCFNMA
Dividend yield 21.4% –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 21.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUWMCFNMA
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 1.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.21FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +75.0%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% -7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.23BFY2026 $31.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.0%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +30.9% -7.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUWMCFNMA
Held by institutions 79.7% 0.0%
Institutions holding 290 25
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.8% +58.6%
Institutions buying 213 13
Institutions selling 50 2
Buyers to sellers 4.26 6.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UWMCFNMA
UWMC 1.00 0.04
FNMA 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UWMC and FNMA?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) is the largest by market capitalisation: UWM Holdings (UWMC) $475.91M, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $24.58B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.8%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) returned the most: UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -62.9%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +36.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UWM Holdings (UWMC) has been the steadiest (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do UWMC and FNMA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.04, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, UWMC and FNMA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.