UMC vs GFS vs MCHP Stock Comparison

United Microelectronics, Globalfoundries and Microchip Technology Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UMC United Microelectronics Corp
$16.40 -37.6% 1M +112.7% 1Y
Market cap
$39.14B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.11B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
9 wins
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$41.82 -16.6% 1M +17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$22.34B
P/E
31.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.94B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
MCHP Microchip Technology Inc
$76.11 -6.4% 1M +21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$40.62B
P/E
110.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Microelectronics leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (United Microelectronics 9, Microchip Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionUMCGFSMCHPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $39.14B $22.34B $40.62B MCHP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.8x 31.2x 110.6x UMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x 23.6x 20.5x UMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +87.7% +1.4% +20.9% UMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.7% 10.3% 7.2% UMC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.6% 5.1% 5.5% UMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.0x -0.6x 3.4x UMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +112.7% +17.5% +21.9% UMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.0%/yr -6.7%/yr -0.9%/yr UMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.2% 60.9% 49.8% MCHP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 62/100 40/100 UMC

Percentile Scorecard

UMCGFSMCHP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisUMCGFSMCHP
Valuation 94 #7 of 94 91 #9 of 94 50 #48 of 94
Growth 78 #21 of 92 36 #59 of 92 41 #55 of 92
Profitability 72 #26 of 90 56 #40 of 90 60 #37 of 90
Financial Health 67 #34 of 101 47 #54 of 101 5 #96 of 101
Shareholder Returns 93 #6 of 74 78 #17 of 74 47 #40 of 74
Overall 81 62 40
  • UMC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • GFS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MCHP ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodUMCGFSMCHPSPY
1 month -37.6%-16.6%-6.4% -2.3%
3 months -12.2%-16.4%+1.2% -0.7%
6 months +26.3%-38.3%-20.1% +4.8%
Year to date +108.7%+19.8%+19.4% +10.3%
1 year +112.7%+17.5%+21.9% +10.3%
3 years +112.4%-20.9%-0.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year +28.6%-7.5%-0.1% +20.1%
5 years +53.6%-29.1%-4.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year +9.0%-6.7%-0.9% +10.1%
10 years +777.0%—+154.3% +258.6%
10 years, per year +24.3%—+9.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureUMCGFSMCHPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.2%60.9%49.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.6%60.8%44.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.882.292.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.730.290.44 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.3%-61.5%-64.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.4%-53.5%-26.0% -3.5%
52-week high $28.01$89.96$102.92 $779.14
52-week low $7.02$32.24$49.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleUMCGFSMCHP
P/E now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 41.3x 32.4xmedian 41.3x 112.4xmedian 41.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 6.6x 3.4xmedian 6.6x 8.1xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 26.2x 10.7xmedian 26.2x 31.0xmedian 26.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.8xmedian 37.7x 29.2xmedian 37.7x 41.9xmedian 37.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 4.3x 2.0xmedian 4.3x 6.4xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.38median 1.81 -1.47median 1.81 -2.42median 1.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsUMCGFSMCHP
Revenue $14.11B $6.94B $5.12B
Gross profit $2.67B $1.88B $3.08B
Operating income $1.81B $804.00M $794.80M
Net income $2.64B $720.00M $478.40M
Free cash flow $2.19B $796.00M $985.70M
R&D $595.72M $563.00M $1.14B
EPS (diluted) $1.07 $1.28 $0.67
Cash & equivalents $4.48B $1.09B $272.30M
Total debt $781.92M $1.12B $5.36B
Shares (diluted) 2.47B 558.00M 550.50M
Enterprise value $23.51B $10.64B $39.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricUMCGFSMCHP
P/E 15.2x 32.4x 112.4x
P/FCF 18.8x 29.2x 41.9x
P/Operating cash flow 11.0x 12.1x 34.5x
P/S 2.9x 3.4x 8.1x
P/B 2.8x 2.0x 6.4x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 2.0x 9.3x
EV/EBITDA 10.0x 10.7x 31.0x
EV/EBIT 20.8x 27.4x 58.4x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 3.2x 9.1x
EV/FCF 17.2x 27.7x 47.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.0x 11.5x 38.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.38 -1.47 -2.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricUMCGFSMCHP
Revenue growth (1Y) 87.7% 1.4% 20.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 22.9% -4.1% -16.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.7% 15.8% 33.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.4% -6.2% -19.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 29.9% 575.7% 627.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -6.7% -12.7% -37.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 97.8% 742.9% 422.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% -21.6% -41.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 97.8% 717.0% 301.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.4% -22.1% -46.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.0% 20.2% 50.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.1% -4.4% -31.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 410.9% -18.1% 67.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.3% -16.2% -32.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricUMCGFSMCHP
Gross margin 18.9% 27.1% 60.2%
EBITDA margin 26.7% 29.5% 29.3%
Operating margin 12.8% 11.6% 15.5%
Pretax margin 30.5% 12.6% 11.3%
Net margin 18.7% 10.3% 7.2%
FCF margin 15.5% 11.5% 19.2%
Operating cash flow margin 26.7% 27.6% 23.4%
Return on equity 18.4% 6.1% 7.4%
Return on assets 12.5% 4.3% 3.3%
Return on invested capital 11.6% 5.1% 5.5%
Return on capital employed 9.6% 5.5% 6.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.7x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 3.4% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricUMCGFSMCHP
Debt / assets 3.7% 6.6% 37.2%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.1x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.0x -0.6x 3.4x
Debt / FCF 0.4x 1.4x 5.4x
Liabilities / assets 30.3% 30.0% 55.2%
Equity / assets 69.7% 70.0% 44.8%
Interest coverage 33.0x – 3.7x
Current ratio 3.3x 2.5x 1.9x
Quick ratio 2.6x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 2.0x 1.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 2.54 4.23

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricUMCGFSMCHP
Dividend yield 2.4% 0.6% 2.4%
Net buyback yield 0.7% 1.7% -0.2%
Shareholder yield 3.2% 2.3% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 206.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 100.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 9.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusUMCGFSMCHP
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 23.6xFY2026 20.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.10FY2026 $1.82FY2026 $3.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +107.5%FY2026 +5.8%FY2026 +131.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -2.7% +33.5% +23.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.52BFY2026 $6.96BFY2026 $6.62BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +40.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.7% +23.0% +20.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersUMCGFSMCHP
Held by institutions 7.1% 98.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 364 439 1,286
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% -3.0% +7.0%
Institutions buying 220 306 682
Institutions selling 110 88 433
Buyers to sellers 2.00 3.48 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

UMCGFSMCHP
UMC 1.00 0.57 0.40
GFS 0.57 1.00 0.59
MCHP 0.40 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, UMC, GFS and MCHP?

Microchip Technology (MCHP) is the largest by market capitalisation: United Microelectronics (UMC) $39.14B, Globalfoundries (GFS) $22.34B, Microchip Technology (MCHP) $40.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, UMC, GFS and MCHP?

United Microelectronics (UMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (United Microelectronics (UMC) 14.8x, Globalfoundries (GFS) 31.2x, Microchip Technology (MCHP) 110.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, United Microelectronics (UMC) is cheapest (United Microelectronics (UMC) 14.9x, Globalfoundries (GFS) 23.6x, Microchip Technology (MCHP) 20.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Microelectronics (UMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: United Microelectronics (UMC) +87.7%, Globalfoundries (GFS) +1.4%, Microchip Technology (MCHP) +20.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Microelectronics (UMC) has the highest net margin (United Microelectronics (UMC) 18.7%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 10.3%, Microchip Technology (MCHP) 7.2%). On return on invested capital, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads (United Microelectronics (UMC) 11.6%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 5.1%, Microchip Technology (MCHP) 5.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Microelectronics (UMC) returned the most: United Microelectronics (UMC) +112.7%, Globalfoundries (GFS) +17.5%, Microchip Technology (MCHP) +21.9%. Over five years, United Microelectronics (UMC) compounded fastest (United Microelectronics (UMC) +9.0%/yr, Globalfoundries (GFS) -6.7%/yr, Microchip Technology (MCHP) -0.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: United Microelectronics (UMC) 0.00%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 0.00%, Microchip Technology (MCHP) 0.02%. United Microelectronics (UMC) and Globalfoundries (GFS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microchip Technology (MCHP) has been the steadiest (United Microelectronics (UMC) 65.2%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 60.9%, Microchip Technology (MCHP) 49.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, UMC, GFS and MCHP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.