TSHA vs SLBT vs CRSP Stock Comparison

Taysha Gene Therapies, SL Science Holding and CRISPR Therapeutics AG Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MESO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CRSP CRISPR Therapeutics AG
$48.56 -10.1% 1M -14.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.17M
Div. yield
–
Gene and Cell Therapy Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

CRISPR Therapeutics AG leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (CRISPR Therapeutics AG 4, Taysha Gene Therapies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTSHASLBTCRSPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.33B $1.96B $4.71B CRSP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -10.1x — -10.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -32.3% — -34.3% TSHA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2,728.0% — -1,812.1% CRSP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -23.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x — 3.3x TSHA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.5% -91.3% -14.8% TSHA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.3%/yr — -11.7%/yr CRSP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 71.0% 177.0% 57.1% CRSP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 — 47/100 TSHA

Percentile Scorecard

TSHASLBTCRSP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTSHASLBTCRSP
Valuation 46 #345 of 634 11 #567 of 634 51 #310 of 634
Growth 17 #506 of 608 – 27 #445 of 608
Profitability 26 #411 of 557 – 37 #354 of 557
Financial Health 76 #158 of 654 57 #281 of 654 69 #202 of 654
Shareholder Returns 76 #97 of 403 – 51 #198 of 403
Overall 48 – 47
  • TSHA ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • SLBT ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • CRSP ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTSHASLBTCRSPSPY
1 month -6.8%-40.8%-10.1% -5.9%
3 months -35.5%-67.0%-6.0% -4.6%
6 months -38.7%-88.6%-7.4% +0.2%
Year to date -25.6%-91.5%-7.4% +7.5%
1 year +1.5%-91.3%-14.8% +8.2%
3 years +68.3%—-5.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +19.0%—-2.0% +19.0%
5 years -73.4%—-46.2% +56.5%
5 years, per year -23.3%—-11.7% +9.4%
10 years ——+219.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+12.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureTSHASLBTCRSPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 71.0%177.0%57.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.2%171.2%53.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.810.581.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.52-0.26 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.3%-93.0%-66.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.4%-93.0%-21.5% -5.9%
52-week high $6.98$12.81$61.89 $779.14
52-week low $3.51$0.90$44.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTSHASLBTCRSP
P/E now vs peer median -10.1xmedian 17.8x —median 17.8x -10.3xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 242.6xmedian 8.1x —median 8.1x 187.1xmedian 8.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.1xmedian 15.7x —median 15.7x -5.9xmedian 15.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -10.0xmedian 21.0x -1,045xmedian 21.0x -12.5xmedian 21.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.0x 281.5xmedian 2.0x 2.9xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.25median 0.36 —median 0.36 5.33median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTSHASLBTCRSP
Revenue $5.49M – $25.17M
Operating income -$153.16M – -$532.33M
Net income -$149.63M – -$456.14M
Free cash flow -$132.57M – -$376.72M
R&D $123.14M – $291.14M
EPS (diluted) $-0.41 – $-4.72
Cash & equivalents $455.41M $8.31M $192.03M
Total debt $49.26M – $586.93M
Shares (diluted) 369.04M – 96.74M
Enterprise value -$18.63M $1.95B -$4.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTSHASLBTCRSP
P/E -10.1x – -10.3x
P/FCF -10.0x -1,045x -12.5x
P/Operating cash flow -10.1x – -12.6x
P/S 242.6x – 187.1x
P/B 3.4x 281.5x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 281.5x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA -6.1x – -5.9x
EV/EBIT -6.0x – -5.7x
EV/Revenue 168.5x – 120.2x
EV/FCF -7.0x – -8.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -7.0x – -8.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.25 – 5.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTSHASLBTCRSP
Revenue growth (1Y) -32.3% – -34.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.1% – -47.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -62.9% – 7.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.7% – -7.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -61.4% – 6.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.5% – -8.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -30.3% – 11.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 40.5% – -1.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -61.0% – -23.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -35.6% – -10.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -60.6% – -24.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.4% – -8.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTSHASLBTCRSP
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin -2,770% – -2,038%
Operating margin -2,792% – -2,115%
Pretax margin -2,593% – -1,802%
Net margin -2,728% – -1,812%
FCF margin -2,417% – -1,497%
Operating cash flow margin -2,410% – -1,488%
Return on equity -47.5% – -26.9%
Return on assets -36.9% – -17.5%
Return on invested capital – – -23.3%
Return on capital employed -42.6% – -21.6%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 331.3% – 276.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTSHASLBTCRSP
Debt / assets 10.5% – 23.0%
Debt / equity 0.1x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x – 3.3x
Debt / FCF -0.4x – -1.6x
Liabilities / assets 17.7% 21.8% 35.5%
Equity / assets 82.3% 78.2% 64.5%
Interest coverage -3,647x – –
Current ratio 17.8x 4.4x 16.2x
Quick ratio 17.5x 4.3x 16.1x
Cash ratio 17.5x 4.3x 16.1x
Altman Z-score 7.26 – 2.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTSHASLBTCRSP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% – -2.9%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 0.0% -2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTSHASLBTCRSP
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.47FY2026 – $-4.27FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.96MFY2026 – $33.04MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -80.0%FY2026 – +841.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1,298.6% – +271.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTSHASLBTCRSP
Held by institutions 81.2% – 78.9%
Institutions holding 209 – 520
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.7% – -1.0%
Institutions buying 140 – 238
Institutions selling 42 – 139
Buyers to sellers 3.33 – 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TSHASLBTCRSP
TSHA 1.00 -0.03 0.45
SLBT -0.03 1.00 -0.03
CRSP 0.45 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TSHA, SLBT and CRSP?

CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) $1.33B, SL Science Holding (SLBT) $1.96B, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) $4.71B.

Which company is growing faster?

Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -32.3%, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -34.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) has the highest net margin (Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -2,728.0%, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -1,812.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) returned the most: Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) +1.5%, SL Science Holding (SLBT) -91.3%, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -14.8%. Over five years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) compounded fastest (Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -23.3%/yr, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) -11.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) has been the steadiest (Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) 71.0%, SL Science Holding (SLBT) 177.0%, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) 57.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TSHA, SLBT and CRSP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.