TSHA vs KRYS vs SLBT Stock Comparison

Taysha Gene Therapies, Krystal Biotech and SL Science Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KRYS Krystal Biotech, Inc.
$321.42 -4.6% 1M +69.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.51B
P/E
39.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$440.53M
Div. yield
–
Gene and Cell Therapy Healthcare
7 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Krystal Biotech leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Krystal Biotech 7). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTSHAKRYSSLBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.38B $9.51B $2.64B KRYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -10.4x 39.3x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 46.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -32.3% +22.6% — KRYS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2,728.0% 54.8% — KRYS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.2% +69.5% -88.3% KRYS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.0%/yr +45.1%/yr — KRYS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 71.5% 38.1% 175.5% KRYS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 85/100 — KRYS

Percentile Scorecard

TSHAKRYSSLBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTSHAKRYSSLBT
Valuation 45 #344 of 625 80 #127 of 625 11 #556 of 625
Growth 17 #503 of 602 93 #43 of 602 –
Profitability 28 #396 of 549 96 #22 of 549 –
Financial Health 76 #158 of 654 84 #104 of 654 58 #276 of 654
Shareholder Returns 78 #80 of 367 71 #109 of 367 –
Overall 49 85 –
  • TSHA ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • KRYS ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • SLBT ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTSHAKRYSSLBTSPY
1 month -15.2%-4.6%-37.3% +0.9%
3 months -24.6%-11.5%-53.5% +5.9%
6 months -32.5%+23.6%-87.9% +8.5%
Year to date -23.1%+30.4%-88.5% +13.3%
1 year -15.2%+69.5%-88.3% +12.4%
3 years +91.4%+181.6%— +88.1%
3 years, per year +24.2%+41.2%— +23.5%
5 years -73.0%+541.7%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -23.0%+45.1%— +11.0%

Risk

MeasureTSHAKRYSSLBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 71.5%38.1%175.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.8%37.4%170.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.830.690.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.211.83-0.50 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.5%-44.5%-91.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.4%-15.0%-90.6% -0.9%
52-week high $6.98$378.15$12.81 $779.14
52-week low $3.51$185.05$1.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTSHAKRYSSLBT
P/E now vs peer median -10.4xmedian 17.4x 39.3xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 250.9xmedian 9.1x 21.6xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.4xmedian 17.1x 42.6xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -10.4xmedian 19.0x 36.9xmedian 19.0x -1,406xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.2x 7.0xmedian 2.2x 378.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.26median 0.34 0.76median 0.34 —median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTSHAKRYSSLBT
Revenue $5.49M $440.53M –
Gross profit – $416.91M –
Operating income -$153.16M $197.75M –
Net income -$149.63M $241.47M –
Free cash flow -$132.57M $257.78M –
R&D $123.14M $59.23M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.41 $7.88 –
Cash & equivalents $455.41M $427.74M $8.31M
Total debt $49.26M – –
Shares (diluted) 369.04M 30.66M –
Enterprise value $26.91M $6.28B $2.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTSHAKRYSSLBT
P/E -10.4x 39.3x –
P/FCF -10.4x 36.9x -1,406x
P/Operating cash flow -10.4x 34.9x –
P/S 250.9x 21.6x –
P/B 3.6x 7.0x 378.4x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 7.0x 378.4x
EV/EBITDA -6.4x 42.6x –
EV/EBIT -6.3x 43.8x –
EV/Revenue 176.8x 19.7x –
EV/FCF -7.3x 33.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow -7.3x 31.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.26 0.76 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTSHAKRYSSLBT
Revenue growth (1Y) -32.3% 22.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 24.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -62.9% 41.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.7% 48.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -61.4% 64.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.5% 54.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -30.3% 59.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 40.5% 51.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -61.0% 39.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -35.6% 67.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -60.6% 39.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.4% 58.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTSHAKRYSSLBT
Gross margin – 94.6% –
EBITDA margin -2,770% 46.2% –
Operating margin -2,792% 44.9% –
Pretax margin -2,593% 51.4% –
Net margin -2,728% 54.8% –
FCF margin -2,417% 58.5% –
Operating cash flow margin -2,410% 61.8% –
Return on equity -47.5% 18.3% –
Return on assets -36.9% 16.7% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -42.6% 15.0% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 331.3% 12.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTSHAKRYSSLBT
Debt / assets 10.5% – –
Debt / equity 0.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x – –
Debt / FCF -0.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 17.7% 9.4% 21.8%
Equity / assets 82.3% 90.6% 78.2%
Interest coverage -3,647x – –
Current ratio 17.8x 8.3x 4.4x
Quick ratio 17.5x 7.7x 4.3x
Cash ratio 17.5x 6.6x 4.3x
Altman Z-score 7.59 41.93 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTSHAKRYSSLBT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% -0.4% –
Shareholder yield -0.2% -0.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTSHAKRYSSLBT
Forward P/E – 46.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.47FY2026 $6.94FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +1.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +25.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.96MFY2026 $514.54MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -80.0%FY2026 +32.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1,298.6% +33.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTSHAKRYSSLBT
Held by institutions 81.2% 99.8% –
Institutions holding 209 421 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.7% +4.6% –
Institutions buying 140 271 –
Institutions selling 42 106 –
Buyers to sellers 3.33 2.56 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TSHAKRYSSLBT
TSHA 1.00 0.28 -0.03
KRYS 0.28 1.00 -0.07
SLBT -0.03 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TSHA, KRYS and SLBT?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) $1.38B, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) $9.51B, SL Science Holding (SLBT) $2.64B.

Which company is growing faster?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -32.3%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +22.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) has the highest net margin (Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -2,728.0%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) 54.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Krystal Biotech (KRYS) returned the most: Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -15.2%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +69.5%, SL Science Holding (SLBT) -88.3%. Over five years, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) compounded fastest (Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) -23.0%/yr, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +45.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) has been the steadiest (Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) 71.5%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) 38.1%, SL Science Holding (SLBT) 175.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TSHA, KRYS and SLBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.