TRP vs ET vs WMB Stock Comparison

Tc Energy, Energy Transfer and Williams Companies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EPD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TRP Tc Energy Corp
$64.34 +10.4% 1M +27.7% 1Y
Market cap
$67.02B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.24B
Div. yield
-0.04%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
2 wins
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.90 +5.0% 1M +23.4% 1Y
Market cap
$71.96B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
4 wins
WMB Williams Companies, Inc.
$74.88 +9.1% 1M +31.4% 1Y
Market cap
$90.87B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.20B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Williams Companies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Williams Companies 5, Energy Transfer 4, Tc Energy 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionTRPETWMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $67.02B $71.96B $90.87B WMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.2x 14.3x 26.9x ET
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.3x 11.6x 29.1x ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.0% +33.3% +8.7% ET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.9% 4.7% 27.7% WMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.4% 8.4% — TRP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x 4.0x 0.9x WMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.04% 0.07% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.7% +23.4% +31.4% WMB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.5%/yr +17.1%/yr +21.7%/yr WMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.8% 17.5% 25.0% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 60/100 39/100 TRP

Percentile Scorecard

TRPETWMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisTRPETWMB
Valuation 74 #10 of 35 94 #3 of 35 3 #34 of 35
Growth 27 #25 of 34 55 #16 of 34 30 #24 of 34
Profitability 97 #2 of 31 37 #20 of 31 77 #8 of 31
Financial Health 94 #3 of 33 53 #16 of 33 59 #14 of 33
Shareholder Returns 33 #21 of 31 63 #12 of 31 27 #23 of 31
Overall 65 60 39
  • TRP ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • WMB ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodTRPETWMBSPY
1 month +10.4%+5.0%+9.1% +0.7%
3 months -5.5%+3.3%+5.6% +3.7%
6 months -3.9%+3.5%-1.9% +7.1%
Year to date +17.0%+26.7%+24.6% +12.8%
1 year +27.7%+23.4%+31.4% +11.9%
3 years +87.8%+58.9%+118.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +23.4%+16.7%+29.8% +22.8%
5 years +18.9%+119.8%+166.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.5%+17.1%+21.7% +10.9%
10 years +41.7%+38.5%+152.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +3.5%+3.3%+9.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureTRPETWMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.8%17.5%25.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 18.6%16.7%25.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.07-0.210.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.401.341.26 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.3%-25.8%-25.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.3%-3.9%-5.7% -1.2%
52-week high $70.91$21.74$79.40 $779.14
52-week low $49.79$16.21$56.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleTRPETWMB
P/E now vs peer median 27.2xmedian 19.6x 14.3xmedian 19.6x 27.1xmedian 19.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 2.8x 0.7xmedian 2.8x 7.5xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 11.1x 8.3xmedian 11.1x 14.0xmedian 11.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 16.9x 13.8xmedian 16.9x -848.1xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.4x 1.4xmedian 2.4x 6.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.57median 1.68 2.04median 1.68 3.29median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsTRPETWMB
Revenue $11.24B $107.38B $12.20B
Gross profit $11.08B $25.32B $10.12B
Operating income $6.82B $10.78B $4.66B
Net income $2.94B $7.04B $3.24B
Free cash flow $9.65B $5.22B -$108.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.37 $1.46 $2.76
Cash & equivalents $1.46B $1.02B $203.00M
Total debt $11.91B $68.41B $6.64B
Shares (diluted) 1.04B 3.46B 1.23B
Enterprise value $63.11B $65.14B $89.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricTRPETWMB
P/E 27.2x 14.3x 27.1x
P/FCF 6.9x 13.8x -848.1x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x 5.9x 15.3x
P/S 6.0x 0.7x 7.5x
P/B 3.4x 1.4x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 1.7x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 8.7x 8.3x 14.0x
EV/EBIT 11.3x 12.9x 21.0x
EV/Revenue 6.9x 1.3x 8.0x
EV/FCF 8.0x 26.7x -907.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.5x 11.5x 16.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.57 2.04 3.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricTRPETWMB
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.0% 33.3% 8.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.1% 18.9% 12.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 5.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -10.0% 16.5% 27.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.0% 4.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -17.9% 16.1% 26.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 52.5% 9.0% 5.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.4% 12.6% 39.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.4% 7.0% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.6% 8.8% 12.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 5.9% 2.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.1% -8.5% -105.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.1% -7.3% -26.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricTRPETWMB
Gross margin 98.5% 23.6% 82.9%
EBITDA margin 78.8% 15.7% 57.3%
Operating margin 60.7% 10.0% 38.2%
Pretax margin 34.9% 7.1% 34.7%
Net margin 21.9% 4.7% 27.7%
FCF margin 85.9% 4.9% -0.9%
Operating cash flow margin 55.2% 11.3% 49.1%
Return on equity 12.6% 14.0% 24.7%
Return on assets – 4.8% 5.8%
Return on invested capital 12.4% 8.4% –
Return on capital employed – 8.4% 8.7%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.7x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricTRPETWMB
Debt / assets – 46.2% 11.0%
Debt / equity 0.6x 1.4x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x 4.0x 0.9x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 13.1x -61.5x
Liabilities / assets – 65.9% 78.2%
Equity / assets – 34.1% 21.8%
Interest coverage 2.8x 2.9x 3.1x
Current ratio – 1.2x 0.5x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 0.3x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – – 1.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricTRPETWMB
Dividend yield 5.4% 6.4% 2.8%
Net buyback yield -0.1% – –
Shareholder yield 5.3% 6.4% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 87.7% 67.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 26.7% 91.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.8% 2.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.5% 8.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusTRPETWMB
Forward P/E 25.3xFY2026 11.6xFY2026 29.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.54FY2026 $1.80FY2026 $2.57FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -0.8%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026 +22.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.0% -9.4% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.85BFY2026 $124.23BFY2026 $12.71BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.2%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026 +6.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.3% +1.4% +9.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersTRPETWMB
Held by institutions 65.7% 31.4% 89.4%
Institutions holding 697 1,281 1,834
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.0% +1.9% +4.2%
Institutions buying 329 628 886
Institutions selling 216 341 659
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.84 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

TRPETWMB
TRP 1.00 0.45 0.62
ET 0.45 1.00 0.54
WMB 0.62 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, TRP, ET and WMB?

Williams Companies (WMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tc Energy (TRP) $67.02B, Energy Transfer (ET) $71.96B, Williams Companies (WMB) $90.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, TRP, ET and WMB?

Energy Transfer (ET) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tc Energy (TRP) 27.2x, Energy Transfer (ET) 14.3x, Williams Companies (WMB) 26.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Tc Energy (TRP) 25.3x, Energy Transfer (ET) 11.6x, Williams Companies (WMB) 29.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Transfer (ET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tc Energy (TRP) -1.0%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Williams Companies (WMB) +8.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Williams Companies (WMB) has the highest net margin (Tc Energy (TRP) 21.9%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Williams Companies (WMB) 27.7%). On return on invested capital, Tc Energy (TRP) leads (Tc Energy (TRP) 12.4%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Williams Companies (WMB) returned the most: Tc Energy (TRP) +27.7%, Energy Transfer (ET) +23.4%, Williams Companies (WMB) +31.4%. Over five years, Williams Companies (WMB) compounded fastest (Tc Energy (TRP) +3.5%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +17.1%/yr, Williams Companies (WMB) +21.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Tc Energy (TRP) -0.04%, Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Williams Companies (WMB) 0.00%. Tc Energy (TRP) and Williams Companies (WMB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Tc Energy (TRP) 19.8%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Williams Companies (WMB) 25.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, TRP, ET and WMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Williams Companies (WMB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.