Williams Companies WMB

NYSE WMB
$72.78 +2.45 (+3.48%)
As of: Oct 21, 2026 · 3:59 PM EDT

Williams Companies (WMB) stock price is $72.78, up 3.48% on the day, as of Oct 21, 2026. It has a market cap of $89.20Bn and a P/E ratio of 26.40, and is classified in the Oil and Gas Pipelines industry (Energy sector).

Key Stats
Market Cap89.20 Bn
P/E26.40
P/S7.31
Div. Yield0.00
Total Debt (Qtr)6.64 Bn
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)9.78
Add ratio to table…

About

Williams Companies, Inc. is an energy company focused on delivering natural gas products through safe and reliable infrastructure. The company operates interstate natural gas pipelines, storage facilities, gathering and processing assets, and natural gas liquids marketing services primarily in the United States. It aims to maximize utilization of its pipeline capacity to provide high quality low cost transportation to large and growing markets. The company generates revenue…

Read more ↓
Sector: Energy Sector rationale The company's primary business is the transportation, storage, gathering, and processing of natural gas and natural gas liquids via interstate pipelines and infrastructure. These activities, along with the marketing and trading of these energy molecules, fall squarely within the Energy sector's scope for oil and gas pipelines and LNG/gas processing. Industries: Oil and Gas Pipelines Oil and Gas Pipelines Primary Williams Companies operates extensive interstate natural gas pipelines such as Transco, Northwest Pipeline, and MountainWest, as well as related storage facilities. Its primary revenue is generated from service fees for the transportation and storage of natural gas. LNG and Gas Processing LNG and Gas Processing Secondary The company operates gathering, processing, and fractionation facilities in the Marcellus, Utica, and Rocky Mountain regions, earning revenue from the processing of natural gas and natural gas liquids. Classified using BQ-MICS CIK: 0000107263
Bull & bear

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • Williams' Power Innovation business represents a significantly undervalued growth engine, with the recent announcement of the Neo project adding $2.3 billion of investment and 682 megawatts of capacity to an already robust pipeline, positioning the company to capitalize on the accelerating demand from hyperscalers for reliable, behind-the-meter power solutions that balance grid stability and affordability, as evidenced by the strong interest from investment-grade counterparties and the company's ability to execute these projects at attractive 5x build multiples, which management highlighted as a key driver of future EBITDA growth beyond current guidance.
  • The company's strategic advantage lies in its integrated value chain across gathering, processing, transmission, and marketing (Sequent), which enables it to deliver comprehensive energy infrastructure solutions that competitors cannot replicate, as demonstrated by the Atlas project's ability to provide natural gas backup generation for data centers by leveraging pipeline compressibility as a storage solution—a low-CapEx, high-reliability innovation that addresses a critical industry pain point and opens new revenue streams in the rapidly expanding data center backup power market.
  • Despite near-term leverage pressure from CapEx deployment, Williams' financing flexibility is underappreciated, with management actively exploring partnering structures that recycle capital while retaining strategic control, and the expectation of enormous earnings growth from projects coming online in 2028 and beyond will naturally delever the balance sheet, creating a clear path to return leverage to the 3.5x to 4x target range while sustaining dividend growth and funding further expansion.
▼ Bear case
  • Williams' aggressive pivot toward power innovation projects introduces execution and regulatory risks that are not being adequately priced in, particularly the reliance on novel behind-the-meter models that require complex air permitting and Public Utility Commission approvals—processes that remain in early stages for projects like Neo and could face delays due to evolving local opposition or shifting regulatory landscapes, as hinted at in management's vague responses about permitting timelines and the absence of concrete progress updates on these critical approvals.
  • The company's growing backlog and project announcements may mask underlying weaknesses in its legacy transmission and gathering businesses, where volume declines in dry gas areas offset growth in rich gas regions, and the Northeast G&P segment showed only 2% growth despite strong Haynesville activity, suggesting that core infrastructure segments are not benefiting uniformly from the natural gas demand uptick and could face sustained pressure if producer activity remains sensitive to sub-$3 Henry Hub pricing.
  • Williams' dependence on securing long-term customer commitments for major projects like Constitution exposes it to significant political and market fragmentation risks, especially in politically divided regions like New England and New York, where the inability to coalesce sufficient critical mass across multiple states and utilities could stall or indefinitely delay high-value infrastructure projects, despite management's acknowledgment of the market's fragility and the project's reliance on FERC processes that remain contingent on unresolved customer aggregation challenges.

Business Acquisition Breakdown of Revenue (2023)

History

Consolidation Items Breakdown of Revenue (2023)

History
Peer percentiles

How Williams Companies ranks

Ranked against the 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream58 metrics · as of Oct 21, 2026

Valuation

12 metrics · Lower multiples rank higher; a negative multiple ranks last
  • P/E 25.5xMedian 20.3x 41st
  • P/FCFNegative free cash flow −796xMedian 16.3x 18th
  • P/Operating cash flow 14.3xMedian 9.51x 12th
  • P/S 7.05xMedian 2.66x 9th
  • P/B 6.52xMedian 2.54x 14th
  • P/Tangible book 6.52xMedian 2.90x 18th
  • EV/EBITDA 13.2xMedian 10.9x 41st
  • EV/EBIT 19.8xMedian 14.5x 44th
  • EV/Revenue 7.58xMedian 4.61x 10th
  • EV/FCFNegative free cash flow −856xMedian 25.6x 16th
  • EV/Operating cash flow 15.4xMedian 14.0x 31st
  • PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.09Median 1.91 16th
Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Oil and Gas Pipelines
View all peers
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 ENB Enbridge Inc 104.84 Bn25.431.7378.92 Bn
2 WMB Williams Companies, Inc. 89.20 Bn26.407.316.64 Bn
3 EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 79.12 Bn12.551.3533.23 Bn
4 KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. 75.45 Bn21.764.2032.25 Bn
5 ET Energy Transfer LP 69.26 Bn13.720.6468.41 Bn
6 TRP Tc Energy Corp 64.74 Bn26.325.7611.91 Bn
7 TRGP Targa Resources Corp. 63.52 Bn28.013.7919.58 Bn
8 LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. 59.48 Bn20.392.7724.04 Bn