SVMB vs TRI vs NOW Stock Comparison

Jingbo Technology, Thomson Reuters and ServiceNow Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MTLS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SVMB Jingbo Technology, Inc.
$2.66 +166.0% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.48B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.24M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
2 wins
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$116.35 +20.9% 1M -23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$51.77B
P/E
32.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
3.46%
Compliance Software Technology
6 wins
NOW ServiceNow, Inc.
$109.65 -15.6% 1M -39.9% 1Y
Market cap
$113.82B
P/E
78.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.43B
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Thomson Reuters leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Thomson Reuters 6, ServiceNow 2, Jingbo Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSVMBTRINOWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.48B $51.77B $113.82B NOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -245.4x 32.2x 78.5x TRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 26.0x 28.5x TRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -45.7% +7.0% +21.8% NOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -486.2% 20.7% 9.4% TRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.6x 1.2x 0.8x SVMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.46% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.7% -23.9% -39.9% SVMB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -1.4%/yr -4.7%/yr TRI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 129.0% 51.5% 66.6% TRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 10/100 55/100 52/100 TRI

Percentile Scorecard

SVMBTRINOW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSVMBTRINOW
Valuation 16 #85 of 101 50 #51 of 101 36 #65 of 101
Growth 6 #91 of 97 25 #73 of 97 49 #50 of 97
Profitability 2 #91 of 93 99 #2 of 93 79 #20 of 93
Financial Health 15 #92 of 108 65 #39 of 108 53 #51 of 108
Shareholder Returns – 39 #39 of 63 42 #37 of 63
Overall 10 55 52
  • SVMB ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • TRI ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • NOW ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSVMBTRINOWSPY
1 month +166.0%+20.9%-15.6% +0.7%
3 months +212.9%+17.7%-0.4% +3.7%
6 months +56.5%+21.6%+24.2% +7.1%
Year to date +23.7%-11.8%-28.4% +12.8%
1 year +26.7%-23.9%-39.9% +11.9%
3 years -99.1%-3.4%-3.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year -79.3%-1.2%-1.2% +22.8%
5 years —-6.9%-21.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-1.4%-4.7% +10.9%
10 years —+183.7%+536.8% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+11.0%+20.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSVMBTRINOWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 129.0%51.5%66.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 380.7%52.0%75.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.500.160.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.21-0.46-0.60 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.9%-64.3%-64.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-25.3%-41.3% -1.2%
52-week high $2.66$155.72$186.94 $779.14
52-week low $0.66$76.55$83.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSVMBTRINOW
P/E now vs peer median -245.4xmedian 28.0x 32.2xmedian 28.0x 78.5xmedian 28.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1,193xmedian 2.8x 6.6xmedian 2.8x 7.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -250.2xmedian 16.9x 25.8xmedian 16.9x 33.9xmedian 16.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -511.1xmedian 15.9x 16.2xmedian 15.9x 24.0xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median -44.7xmedian 3.2x 4.7xmedian 3.2x 8.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.79median 0.89 3.11median 0.89 -22.98median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSVMBTRINOW
Revenue $1.24M $7.83B $15.43B
Gross profit -$132.45K – $11.28B
Operating income -$6.50M $2.33B $1.49B
Net income -$6.64M $1.68B $1.45B
Free cash flow -$2.89M $3.19B $4.75B
R&D $245.84K – $3.47B
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $3.61 $1.39
Cash & equivalents $47.85K $577.00M $2.39B
Total debt $27.85M $3.26B $7.52B
Shares (diluted) 555.32M 449.53M 1.04B
Enterprise value $1.48B $48.55B $93.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSVMBTRINOW
P/E -245.4x 32.2x 78.5x
P/FCF -511.1x 16.2x 24.0x
P/Operating cash flow -551.0x 17.9x 21.3x
P/S 1,193x 6.6x 7.4x
P/B -44.7x 4.7x 8.7x
P/Tangible book -44.7x 6.4x 12.0x
EV/EBITDA -250.2x 25.8x 33.9x
EV/EBIT -231.6x 23.3x 78.2x
EV/Revenue 1,216x 6.9x 7.6x
EV/FCF -520.7x 17.0x 24.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -561.4x 18.8x 21.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.79 3.11 -22.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSVMBTRINOW
Revenue growth (1Y) -45.7% 7.0% 21.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 5.2% 22.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -143.9% – 14.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 42.3% – 19.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -71.1% 9.1% -14.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -11.3% -0.5% 32.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -283.0% 4.7% -16.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -9.7% -6.8% -3.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -431.3% 8.4% -16.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -42.4% 10.4% -3.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.4% 14.5% 10.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -178.1% 10.1% 21.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -60.8% 13.0% 20.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.6% 9.0% 25.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSVMBTRINOW
Gross margin -10.7% – 73.1%
EBITDA margin -486.0% 26.9% 22.3%
Operating margin -525.0% 29.7% 9.7%
Pretax margin -535.8% 46.5% 13.1%
Net margin -486.2% 20.7% 9.4%
FCF margin -233.5% 40.7% 30.8%
Operating cash flow margin -216.6% 36.9% 34.6%
Return on equity – – 11.3%
Return on assets -87.5% – 4.6%
Return on invested capital – – 5.2%
Return on capital employed – – 7.5%
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.7x 3.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 10.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSVMBTRINOW
Debt / assets 373.6% 18.0% 23.6%
Debt / equity -0.8x 0.3x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -4.6x 1.2x 0.8x
Debt / FCF -9.6x 1.0x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 543.0% 38.5% 58.9%
Equity / assets -443.0% 61.5% 41.1%
Interest coverage -98.6x 116.5x 14.6x
Current ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.9x -2.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 9.42 5.88 4.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSVMBTRINOW
Dividend yield – 3.5% –
Net buyback yield – -2.2% 2.3%
Shareholder yield – 1.2% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 30.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 16.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -10.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -8.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSVMBTRINOW
Forward P/E – 26.0xFY2026 28.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.47FY2026 $3.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +12.6%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +8.1% +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.73BFY2026 $15.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.8%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.5% +17.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSVMBTRINOW
Held by institutions – 90.1% 81.6%
Institutions holding – 421 2,224
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.6% -2.1%
Institutions buying – 408 1,285
Institutions selling – 9 779
Buyers to sellers – 45.33 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SVMBTRINOW
SVMB 1.00 0.11 -0.05
TRI 0.11 1.00 0.52
NOW -0.05 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SVMB, TRI and NOW?

ServiceNow (NOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Jingbo Technology (SVMB) $1.48B, Thomson Reuters (TRI) $51.77B, ServiceNow (NOW) $113.82B.

Which stock is cheaper, SVMB, TRI and NOW?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -245.4x, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 32.2x, ServiceNow (NOW) 78.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thomson Reuters (TRI) is cheapest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) 26.0x, ServiceNow (NOW) 28.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ServiceNow (NOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -45.7%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%, ServiceNow (NOW) +21.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest net margin (Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -486.2%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%, ServiceNow (NOW) 9.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Jingbo Technology (SVMB) returned the most: Jingbo Technology (SVMB) +26.7%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) -23.9%, ServiceNow (NOW) -39.9%. Over five years, Thomson Reuters (TRI) compounded fastest (Thomson Reuters (TRI) -1.4%/yr, ServiceNow (NOW) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Thomson Reuters (TRI) 3.46%. Jingbo Technology (SVMB) and ServiceNow (NOW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thomson Reuters (TRI) has been the steadiest (Jingbo Technology (SVMB) 129.0%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.5%, ServiceNow (NOW) 66.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SVMB, TRI and NOW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thomson Reuters (TRI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.