RGR vs UMAC Stock Comparison

Sturm Ruger and Unusual Machines Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RGR Sturm Ruger & Co Inc
$46.38 +8.5% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$741.07M
P/E
60.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$577.24M
Div. yield
0.95%
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$17.87 -25.8% 1M +18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$892.72M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.88M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Unusual Machines leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Unusual Machines 3, Sturm Ruger 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGRUMACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $741.07M $892.72M UMAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 60.8x -36.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +236.0% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.1% -91.6% RGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.95% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.9% +18.1% UMAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.5% 126.9% RGR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 47/100 RGR

Percentile Scorecard

RGRUMAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGRUMAC
Valuation 49 #18 of 34 9 #31 of 34
Growth 42 #19 of 32 74 #9 of 32
Profitability 65 #12 of 32 13 #28 of 32
Financial Health 88 #5 of 33 91 #4 of 33
Shareholder Returns 18 #15 of 18 –
Overall 52 47
  • RGR ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGRUMACSPY
1 month +8.5%-25.8% -0.2%
3 months +20.7%-10.3% +3.9%
6 months +7.6%+23.3% +8.2%
Year to date +42.1%+40.3% +12.9%
1 year -0.9%+18.1% +12.3%
3 years -14.0%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -4.9%— +23.3%
5 years -40.3%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -9.8%— +10.9%
10 years -21.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRGRUMACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.5%126.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.3%117.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.774.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.020.14 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.6%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-47.2% -1.2%
52-week high $50.25$33.87 $779.14
52-week low $28.81$7.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGRUMAC
P/E now vs peer median 60.8xmedian 17.8x -36.6xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.1x 34.5xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 9.4x -20.9xmedian 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 10.2x —median 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -1.45median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGRUMAC
Revenue $577.24M $25.88M
Gross profit $107.93M $9.21M
Operating income $5.63M -$29.72M
Net income $12.18M -$23.71M
Free cash flow $47.35M –
R&D – $625.44K
EPS (diluted) $0.75 $-0.49
Cash & equivalents $30.65M $229.60M
Shares (diluted) 16.27M 48.61M
Enterprise value $345.07M $429.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGRUMAC
P/E 60.8x -36.6x
P/FCF 15.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 11.5x –
P/S 1.3x 34.5x
P/B 2.6x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 21.0x -20.9x
EV/EBIT 110.9x -20.7x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 23.8x
EV/FCF 13.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.45 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGRUMAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 236.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 310.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -11.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 93.5% -19.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -57.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 111.5% 40.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -43.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 112.8% 73.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGRUMAC
Gross margin 18.7% 35.6%
EBITDA margin 5.2% -114.1%
Operating margin 1.0% -114.8%
Pretax margin 2.0% -100.7%
Net margin 2.1% -91.6%
FCF margin 8.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.2% –
Return on equity 4.2% -9.3%
Return on assets 3.4% -9.0%
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed 2.0% -10.5%
Asset turnover 1.6x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGRUMAC
Debt / assets – –
Debt / equity – –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 20.4% 2.4%
Equity / assets 79.6% 97.6%
Interest coverage 55.7x -37,148x
Current ratio 3.3x 53.8x
Quick ratio 2.7x 41.6x
Cash ratio 1.6x 40.2x
Altman Z-score 9.79 57.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGRUMAC
Dividend yield 0.9% –
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGRUMAC
Forward P/E 30.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.53FY2026 $-0.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +82.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +28.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $550.45MFY2026 $53.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.8%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +116.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGRUMAC
Held by institutions 59.6% 59.7%
Institutions holding 172 183
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% +23.8%
Institutions buying 76 134
Institutions selling 45 40
Buyers to sellers 1.69 3.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGRUMAC
RGR 1.00 0.17
UMAC 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGR and UMAC?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sturm Ruger (RGR) $741.07M, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $892.72M.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sturm Ruger (RGR) +7.6%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +236.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sturm Ruger (RGR) has the highest net margin (Sturm Ruger (RGR) 2.1%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -91.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unusual Machines (UMAC) returned the most: Sturm Ruger (RGR) -0.9%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +18.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Sturm Ruger (RGR) 0.95%. Unusual Machines (UMAC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sturm Ruger (RGR) has been the steadiest (Sturm Ruger (RGR) 38.5%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 126.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do RGR and UMAC move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.17, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, RGR and UMAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Unusual Machines (UMAC) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.