RGR vs UMAC vs ESCA Stock Comparison

Sturm Ruger, Unusual Machines and Escalade Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RGR Sturm Ruger & Co Inc
$46.38 +8.5% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$738.49M
P/E
60.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$577.24M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$17.87 -25.8% 1M +18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$838.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$25.88M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
ESCA Escalade Inc
$18.45 -5.5% 1M +57.8% 1Y
Market cap
$254.01M
P/E
11.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$243.83M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Escalade leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Escalade 7, Unusual Machines 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGRUMACESCALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $738.49M $838.30M $254.01M UMAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 60.7x -35.4x 11.0x ESCA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.3x — 11.5x ESCA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +236.0% +1.0% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.1% -91.6% 9.5% ESCA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 11.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.9% +18.1% +57.8% ESCA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.8%/yr — -0.6%/yr ESCA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.5% 126.9% 37.6% ESCA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 47/100 76/100 ESCA

Percentile Scorecard

RGRUMACESCA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGRUMACESCA
Valuation 49 #18 of 34 9 #31 of 34 94 #3 of 34
Growth 42 #19 of 32 74 #9 of 32 55 #15 of 32
Profitability 65 #12 of 32 13 #28 of 32 94 #3 of 32
Financial Health 88 #5 of 33 91 #4 of 33 69 #11 of 33
Shareholder Returns 18 #15 of 18 – 71 #6 of 18
Overall 52 47 76
  • RGR ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • ESCA ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGRUMACESCASPY
1 month +8.5%-25.8%-5.5% -0.2%
3 months +20.7%-10.3%-7.2% +3.9%
6 months +7.6%+23.3%+0.6% +8.2%
Year to date +42.1%+40.3%+36.8% +12.9%
1 year -0.9%+18.1%+57.8% +12.3%
3 years -14.0%—+12.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -4.9%—+4.1% +23.3%
5 years -40.3%—-2.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -9.8%—-0.6% +10.9%
10 years -21.3%—+45.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.4%—+3.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRGRUMACESCASPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.5%126.9%37.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.3%117.5%32.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.774.050.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.020.141.54 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.6%-75.6%-54.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-47.2%-18.4% -1.2%
52-week high $50.25$33.87$22.60 $779.14
52-week low $28.81$7.76$11.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGRUMACESCA
P/E now vs peer median 60.8xmedian 17.8x -36.6xmedian 17.8x 11.0xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.1x 34.5xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 9.4x -20.9xmedian 9.4x 7.2xmedian 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 10.2x —median 10.2x 9.8xmedian 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.4x 1.4xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -1.45median 0.32 —median 0.32 0.27median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGRUMACESCA
Revenue $577.24M $25.88M $243.83M
Gross profit $107.93M $9.21M $68.68M
Operating income $5.63M -$29.72M $30.22M
Net income $12.18M -$23.71M $23.07M
Free cash flow $47.35M – $25.92M
R&D – $625.44K –
EPS (diluted) $0.75 $-0.49 $1.66
Cash & equivalents $30.65M $229.60M $16.39M
Total debt – – $14.88M
Shares (diluted) 16.27M 48.61M 13.90M
Enterprise value $342.49M $374.79M $209.18M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGRUMACESCA
P/E 60.8x -36.6x 11.0x
P/FCF 15.7x – 9.8x
P/Operating cash flow 11.5x – 8.8x
P/S 1.3x 34.5x 1.0x
P/B 2.6x 2.3x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.3x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 21.0x -20.9x 7.2x
EV/EBIT 110.9x -20.7x 8.4x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 23.8x 1.0x
EV/FCF 13.2x – 9.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x – 8.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.45 – 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGRUMACESCA
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 236.0% 1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.2% – -3.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 310.3% 12.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -11.4% – 6.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 93.5% -19.9% 61.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -57.8% – 24.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 111.5% 40.0% 80.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -43.6% – 40.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 112.8% 73.1% 80.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.9% – 40.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.7% – -27.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% – 9.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.1% – -31.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.7% – 8.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGRUMACESCA
Gross margin 18.7% 35.6% 28.2%
EBITDA margin 5.2% -114.1% 14.5%
Operating margin 1.0% -114.8% 12.4%
Pretax margin 2.0% -100.7% 12.3%
Net margin 2.1% -91.6% 9.5%
FCF margin 8.2% – 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 11.2% – 11.8%
Return on equity 4.2% -9.3% 12.9%
Return on assets 3.4% -9.0% 10.0%
Return on invested capital – – 11.9%
Return on capital employed 2.0% -10.5% 16.2%
Asset turnover 1.6x 0.1x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.3x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGRUMACESCA
Debt / assets – – 6.3%
Debt / equity – – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.0x
Debt / FCF – – 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 20.4% 2.4% 22.1%
Equity / assets 79.6% 97.6% 77.9%
Interest coverage 55.7x -37,148x 40.7x
Current ratio 3.3x 53.8x 3.2x
Quick ratio 2.7x 41.6x 1.4x
Cash ratio 1.6x 40.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 9.79 57.40 5.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGRUMACESCA
Dividend yield 0.9% – 3.3%
Net buyback yield – – 0.9%
Shareholder yield 0.9% – 4.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGRUMACESCA
Forward P/E 30.3xFY2026 – 11.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.53FY2026 $-0.29FY2026 $1.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +82.1%FY2026 – +62.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.1% – -27.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $550.45MFY2026 $53.31MFY2026 $256.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.8%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026 +6.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +116.9% -7.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGRUMACESCA
Held by institutions 59.6% 59.7% 30.6%
Institutions holding 172 183 85
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% +23.8% +0.4%
Institutions buying 76 134 32
Institutions selling 45 40 33
Buyers to sellers 1.69 3.35 0.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGRUMACESCA
RGR 1.00 0.17 0.22
UMAC 0.17 1.00 0.09
ESCA 0.22 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGR, UMAC and ESCA?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sturm Ruger (RGR) $738.49M, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $838.30M, Escalade (ESCA) $254.01M.

Which stock is cheaper, RGR, UMAC and ESCA?

Escalade (ESCA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sturm Ruger (RGR) 60.7x, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -35.4x, Escalade (ESCA) 11.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Escalade (ESCA) is cheapest (Sturm Ruger (RGR) 30.3x, Escalade (ESCA) 11.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sturm Ruger (RGR) +7.6%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +236.0%, Escalade (ESCA) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Escalade (ESCA) has the highest net margin (Sturm Ruger (RGR) 2.1%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -91.6%, Escalade (ESCA) 9.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Escalade (ESCA) returned the most: Sturm Ruger (RGR) -0.9%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +18.1%, Escalade (ESCA) +57.8%. Over five years, Escalade (ESCA) compounded fastest (Sturm Ruger (RGR) -9.8%/yr, Escalade (ESCA) -0.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Escalade (ESCA) has been the steadiest (Sturm Ruger (RGR) 38.5%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 126.9%, Escalade (ESCA) 37.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RGR, UMAC and ESCA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Escalade (ESCA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.