RACE vs RL vs TPR Stock Comparison

Ferrari, Ralph Lauren and Tapestry Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RIVN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RACE Ferrari N.V.
$393.28 -4.8% 1M -2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$70.08B
P/E
36.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.58B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
RL Ralph Lauren Corp
$377.65 +11.9% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.26B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.36B
Div. yield
0.01%
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
TPR Tapestry, Inc.
$110.38 -0.1% 1M -3.9% 1Y
Market cap
$22.61B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.00B
Div. yield
–
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tapestry leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Tapestry 4, Ralph Lauren 4, Ferrari 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRACERLTPRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $70.08B $23.26B $22.61B RACE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.7x 23.7x 14.8x TPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.9x 20.5x 14.7x TPR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.3% +14.7% +14.2% RL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.2% 11.8% 19.1% RACE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.8% 24.6% 228.7% TPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -0.5x — RL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.4% +12.3% -3.9% RL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.0%/yr +25.1%/yr +23.4%/yr RL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.5% 34.6% 41.7% RACE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 67/100 71/100 TPR

Percentile Scorecard

RACERLTPR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRACERLTPR
Valuation 14 #43 of 50 22 #36 of 46 53 #22 of 46
Growth 90 #6 of 49 79 #10 of 43 88 #6 of 43
Profitability 100 #1 of 48 90 #5 of 42 100 #1 of 42
Financial Health 77 #13 of 54 75 #14 of 53 37 #34 of 53
Shareholder Returns 30 #22 of 31 70 #11 of 34 79 #8 of 34
Overall 62 67 71
  • RACE ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • RL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • TPR ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRACERLTPRSPY
1 month -4.8%+11.9%-0.1% -1.0%
3 months +9.2%+1.1%-22.6% +2.9%
6 months +11.7%+1.7%-24.3% +6.4%
Year to date +6.4%+6.8%-13.6% +11.4%
1 year -2.4%+12.3%-3.9% +13.1%
3 years +30.7%+223.7%+295.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +9.3%+48.0%+58.2% +21.5%
5 years +76.4%+206.7%+185.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +12.0%+25.1%+23.4% +10.9%
10 years +647.7%+290.8%+210.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year +22.3%+14.6%+12.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureRACERLTPRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.5%34.6%41.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.8%30.8%47.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.951.211.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.080.36-0.09 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.2%-37.4%-43.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.9%-8.8%-33.0% -2.5%
52-week high $436.54$414.25$164.78 $779.14
52-week low $314.63$309.29$98.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRACERLTPR
P/E now vs peer median 36.7xmedian 18.9x 23.1xmedian 15.9x 14.7xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 0.5x 2.7xmedian 0.7x 2.8xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 41.8xmedian 8.5x 14.8xmedian 9.2x 9.8xmedian 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 64.6xmedian 8.8x 21.8xmedian 12.2x 12.2xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 34.9xmedian 0.9x 8.3xmedian 2.2x 32.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.83median 1.35 0.86median 0.57 0.63median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRACERLTPR
Revenue $8.58B $8.36B $8.00B
Gross profit $4.43B $5.87B $6.23B
Operating income $2.75B $1.25B $1.91B
Net income $1.91B $982.90M $1.53B
Free cash flow $2.26B $1.04B $1.81B
R&D $1.08B – –
EPS (diluted) $10.70 $16.03 $7.27
Cash & equivalents $1.70B $1.72B $974.70M
Total debt $3.62B $4.95B –
Shares (diluted) 178.32M 61.30M 210.20M
Enterprise value $62.57B $15.35B $18.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRACERLTPR
P/E 36.7x 23.1x 14.7x
P/FCF 64.6x 21.8x 12.2x
P/Operating cash flow 52.0x 17.2x 11.2x
P/S 17.0x 2.7x 2.8x
P/B 34.9x 8.3x 32.0x
P/Tangible book 65.5x 8.6x -906.6x
EV/EBITDA 41.8x 14.8x 9.8x
EV/EBIT 53.8x 17.6x 11.0x
EV/Revenue 17.2x 2.6x 2.6x
EV/FCF 65.4x 21.1x 11.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 52.6x 16.7x 10.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.83 0.86 0.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRACERLTPR
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.3% 14.7% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 9.0% 6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.3% 16.7% 17.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.0% 11.8% 9.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.7% 25.2% 361.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 18.1% 21.5% 17.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.9% 23.7% 733.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.9% 22.8% 17.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.0% 26.1% 782.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 20.1% 26.7% 23.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.8% 16.2% 62.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.9% 27.4% 26.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.8% 36.6% 65.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.0% 35.6% 31.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRACERLTPR
Gross margin 51.6% 70.3% 77.8%
EBITDA margin 41.3% 17.8% 26.6%
Operating margin 32.0% 14.9% 23.9%
Pretax margin 28.9% 14.9% 23.2%
Net margin 22.2% 11.8% 19.1%
FCF margin 26.3% 12.5% 22.6%
Operating cash flow margin 32.8% 15.8% 24.7%
Return on equity 43.4% 35.3% 222.3%
Return on assets 16.3% 12.8% 23.2%
Return on invested capital 26.8% 24.6% 228.7%
Return on capital employed – 21.4% 38.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.1x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.4% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRACERLTPR
Debt / assets 31.0% 16.2% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -0.5x –
Debt / FCF 1.6x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 64.2% 64.5% 89.7%
Equity / assets 35.8% 35.5% 10.3%
Interest coverage 17.1x 22.4x –
Current ratio – 2.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 1.3x 0.8x
Cash ratio – 1.0x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 6.25 3.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRACERLTPR
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.0% 1.5%
Net buyback yield – 2.8% 6.5%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 3.8% 8.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 22.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRACERLTPR
Forward P/E 34.9xFY2026 20.5xFY2026 14.7xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $11.28FY2026 $18.46FY2026 $7.51FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +7.2%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026 +6.5%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +14.4% +20.3% +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.98BFY2026 $8.11BFY2026 $8.88BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY -4.9%FY2026 -0.1%FY2026 +11.0%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +10.2% +7.3% -4.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRACERLTPR
Held by institutions 32.8% 65.2% 97.4%
Institutions holding 707 808 1,101
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +0.6% +4.4%
Institutions buying 326 388 601
Institutions selling 238 324 373
Buyers to sellers 1.37 1.20 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RACERLTPR
RACE 1.00 0.38 0.22
RL 0.38 1.00 0.53
TPR 0.22 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RACE, RL and TPR?

Ferrari (RACE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferrari (RACE) $70.08B, Ralph Lauren (RL) $23.26B, Tapestry (TPR) $22.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, RACE, RL and TPR?

Tapestry (TPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferrari (RACE) 36.7x, Ralph Lauren (RL) 23.7x, Tapestry (TPR) 14.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Tapestry (TPR) is cheapest (Ferrari (RACE) 34.9x, Ralph Lauren (RL) 20.5x, Tapestry (TPR) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ralph Lauren (RL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferrari (RACE) +13.3%, Ralph Lauren (RL) +14.7%, Tapestry (TPR) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ferrari (RACE) has the highest net margin (Ferrari (RACE) 22.2%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 11.8%, Tapestry (TPR) 19.1%). On return on invested capital, Tapestry (TPR) leads (Ferrari (RACE) 26.8%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 24.6%, Tapestry (TPR) 228.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ralph Lauren (RL) returned the most: Ferrari (RACE) -2.4%, Ralph Lauren (RL) +12.3%, Tapestry (TPR) -3.9%. Over five years, Ralph Lauren (RL) compounded fastest (Ferrari (RACE) +12.0%/yr, Ralph Lauren (RL) +25.1%/yr, Tapestry (TPR) +23.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ferrari (RACE) 0.00%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 0.01%, Tapestry (TPR) 0.00%. Ferrari (RACE) and Tapestry (TPR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrari (RACE) has been the steadiest (Ferrari (RACE) 31.5%, Ralph Lauren (RL) 34.6%, Tapestry (TPR) 41.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RACE, RL and TPR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tapestry (TPR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.