OMF vs STNE vs EZPW Stock Comparison

OneMain Holdings, StoneCo and Ezcorp Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AFRM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc.
$56.60 +1.1% 1M -7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.68B
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.08B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
2 wins
STNE StoneCo Ltd.
$7.39 -22.6% 1M -61.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.06B
P/E
2.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
EZPW Ezcorp Inc
$28.74 -4.8% 1M +58.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.81B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.58B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ezcorp leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ezcorp 5, StoneCo 4, OneMain Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMFSTNEEZPWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.68B $2.06B $1.81B OMF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.6x 2.9x 11.4x STNE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.9x 4.0x 15.0x STNE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +18.3% +28.6% EZPW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.4% 26.2% 10.0% STNE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.7% — 9.8% EZPW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.9x — 0.8x EZPW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.8% -61.1% +58.4% EZPW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.4%/yr -24.9%/yr +30.5%/yr EZPW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.8% 65.4% 42.8% OMF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 79/100 72/100 STNE

Percentile Scorecard

OMFSTNEEZPW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMFSTNEEZPW
Valuation 72 #48 of 168 92 #14 of 168 75 #42 of 168
Growth 56 #73 of 163 86 #23 of 163 90 #17 of 163
Profitability 97 #6 of 154 86 #23 of 154 71 #45 of 154
Financial Health 16 #136 of 162 34 #108 of 162 92 #14 of 162
Shareholder Returns 48 #72 of 137 99 #3 of 137 29 #97 of 137
Overall 58 79 72
  • OMF ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • STNE ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • EZPW ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMFSTNEEZPWSPY
1 month +1.1%-22.6%-4.8% -2.0%
3 months -13.5%-34.2%-7.3% -2.2%
6 months +2.8%-33.3%-14.0% +4.2%
Year to date -16.2%-50.0%+48.0% +10.6%
1 year -7.8%-61.1%+58.4% +10.4%
3 years +48.0%-32.4%+238.5% +73.6%
3 years, per year +14.0%-12.3%+50.2% +20.2%
5 years +7.4%-76.2%+278.2% +61.6%
5 years, per year +1.4%-24.9%+30.5% +10.1%
10 years +107.7%—+200.9% +261.3%
10 years, per year +7.6%—+11.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOMFSTNEEZPWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.8%65.4%42.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.1%74.2%43.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.041.441.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.27-0.931.37 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.9%-77.1%-35.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.7%-61.2%-19.2% -3.2%
52-week high $71.37$19.04$35.59 $779.14
52-week low $49.26$7.39$17.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMFSTNEEZPW
P/E now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 11.8x 2.8xmedian 11.8x 11.2xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.7x 0.8xmedian 2.7x 1.1xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x 7.6xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 6.0x 2.8xmedian 6.0x 12.8xmedian 6.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.02median 0.33 0.03median 0.33 0.17median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMFSTNEEZPW
Revenue $5.08B $2.73B $1.58B
Gross profit $4.89B $1.19B $927.76M
Operating income $2.92B $1.03B $220.26M
Net income $781.00M $584.68M $159.09M
Free cash flow $3.23B $842.18M $138.33M
EPS (diluted) $6.75 $2.62 $1.90
Cash & equivalents $567.00M $1.42B $311.03M
Total debt $22.77B – $519.49M
Shares (diluted) 115.76M 273.49M 83.36M
Enterprise value $3.71B -$3.66B $210.03M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMFSTNEEZPW
P/E 8.4x 2.8x 11.2x
P/FCF 2.0x 2.8x 12.8x
P/Operating cash flow 2.0x 3.0x 9.7x
P/S 1.3x 0.8x 1.1x
P/B 1.9x 1.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 1.3x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 8.9x – 7.6x
EV/EBIT 9.8x 0.7x 9.0x
EV/Revenue 5.7x 0.3x 1.2x
EV/FCF 8.9x 0.9x 14.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.9x 1.0x 10.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.02 0.03 0.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMFSTNEEZPW
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 18.3% 28.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 2.0% 16.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.2% 13.7% 28.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.5% -16.8% 16.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.5% 1,432% 59.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.1% -10.7% 34.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 17.8% 99.8% 62.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 54.6% 64.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 21.5% 89.5% 60.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 84.2% 66.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.7% 415.0% 28.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 22.3% 25.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.7% 236.8% 39.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 15.1% 39.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMFSTNEEZPW
Gross margin 96.2% 43.7% 58.6%
EBITDA margin 63.2% – 16.3%
Operating margin 57.4% 37.5% 13.9%
Pretax margin 19.8% 19.8% 13.4%
Net margin 15.4% 26.2% 10.0%
FCF margin 63.6% 30.8% 8.7%
Operating cash flow margin 63.6% 28.5% 11.5%
Return on equity 23.1% 35.1% 13.8%
Return on assets 2.9% 6.4% 7.4%
Return on invested capital 8.7% – 9.8%
Return on capital employed – 28.7% 11.5%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.1x 1.3x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMFSTNEEZPW
Debt / assets 83.0% – 24.0%
Debt / equity 6.7x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.9x – 0.8x
Debt / FCF 7.0x – 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 87.7% 84.4% 46.1%
Equity / assets 12.3% 15.6% 53.9%
Interest coverage – 1.2x 6.7x
Current ratio – 1.3x 4.8x
Quick ratio – 0.2x 1.6x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 1.3x
Altman Z-score – 1.01 3.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMFSTNEEZPW
Dividend yield 7.4% 34.2% –
Net buyback yield 3.7% – 0.5%
Shareholder yield 11.1% 34.2% 0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMFSTNEEZPW
Forward P/E 8.9xFY2026 4.0xFY2026 15.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.37FY2026 $1.84FY2026 $1.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -4.4%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026 +33.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +38.3% +15.8% +22.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.39BFY2026 $2.94BFY2026 $1.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.0%FY2026 +14.0%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.0% +4.0% +19.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMFSTNEEZPW
Held by institutions 93.8% 59.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 522 273 315
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.6% -7.6% +1.4%
Institutions buying 286 148 140
Institutions selling 173 81 116
Buyers to sellers 1.65 1.83 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMFSTNEEZPW
OMF 1.00 0.18 0.28
STNE 0.18 1.00 0.19
EZPW 0.28 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMF, STNE and EZPW?

OneMain Holdings (OMF) is the largest by market capitalisation: OneMain Holdings (OMF) $6.68B, StoneCo (STNE) $2.06B, Ezcorp (EZPW) $1.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, OMF, STNE and EZPW?

StoneCo (STNE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (OneMain Holdings (OMF) 8.6x, StoneCo (STNE) 2.9x, Ezcorp (EZPW) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, StoneCo (STNE) is cheapest (OneMain Holdings (OMF) 8.9x, StoneCo (STNE) 4.0x, Ezcorp (EZPW) 15.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ezcorp (EZPW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: OneMain Holdings (OMF) +7.8%, StoneCo (STNE) +18.3%, Ezcorp (EZPW) +28.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

StoneCo (STNE) has the highest net margin (OneMain Holdings (OMF) 15.4%, StoneCo (STNE) 26.2%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 10.0%). On return on invested capital, Ezcorp (EZPW) leads (OneMain Holdings (OMF) 8.7%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 9.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ezcorp (EZPW) returned the most: OneMain Holdings (OMF) -7.8%, StoneCo (STNE) -61.1%, Ezcorp (EZPW) +58.4%. Over five years, Ezcorp (EZPW) compounded fastest (OneMain Holdings (OMF) +1.4%/yr, StoneCo (STNE) -24.9%/yr, Ezcorp (EZPW) +30.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, OneMain Holdings (OMF) has been the steadiest (OneMain Holdings (OMF) 28.8%, StoneCo (STNE) 65.4%, Ezcorp (EZPW) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMF, STNE and EZPW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ezcorp (EZPW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.