NTAP vs SNDK vs UMC Stock Comparison

NetApp, Sandisk and United Microelectronics Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (P) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$218.42 +4.4% 1M +91.4% 1Y
Market cap
$38.83B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins
SNDK Sandisk Corp
$1,330.05 -23.1% 1M +550.8% 1Y
Market cap
$168.29B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.97B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
5 wins
UMC United Microelectronics Corp
$18.04 -27.0% 1M +144.1% 1Y
Market cap
$40.50B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.11B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Sandisk leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sandisk 5, NetApp 4, United Microelectronics 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTAPSNDKUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $38.83B $168.29B $40.50B SNDK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.4x 8.7x 15.3x SNDK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.8x 6.5x 16.4x SNDK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.2% +272.4% +87.7% SNDK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.2% — 18.7% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 36.7% — 11.6% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — -1.0x UMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +91.4% +550.8% +144.1% SNDK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.6%/yr — +11.9%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.9% 110.9% 64.6% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 80/100 80/100 UMC

Percentile Scorecard

NTAPSNDKUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTAPSNDKUMC
Valuation 41 #67 of 112 56 #50 of 112 95 #6 of 94
Growth 53 #51 of 108 100 #1 of 108 78 #21 of 92
Profitability 93 #8 of 104 92 #9 of 104 72 #25 of 88
Financial Health 29 #83 of 116 72 #33 of 116 67 #32 of 96
Shareholder Returns 73 #22 of 78 – 89 #9 of 72
Overall 58 80 80
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SNDK ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • UMC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTAPSNDKUMCSPY
1 month +4.4%-23.1%-27.0% +0.7%
3 months +25.5%+3.9%-4.9% +3.7%
6 months +97.2%+21.3%+38.1% +7.1%
Year to date +104.0%+460.3%+129.5% +12.8%
1 year +91.4%+550.8%+144.1% +11.9%
3 years +206.9%—+155.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +45.4%—+36.7% +22.8%
5 years +144.6%—+75.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +19.6%—+11.9% +10.9%
10 years +547.0%—+864.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +20.5%—+25.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNTAPSNDKUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.9%110.9%64.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.9%106.1%56.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.384.001.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.044.972.23 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-56.5%-57.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.7%-43.0%-35.6% -1.2%
52-week high $239.18$2,335.00$28.01 $779.14
52-week low $94.11$194.38$7.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTAPSNDKUMC
P/E now vs peer median 30.2xmedian 32.9x 10.1xmedian 32.9x 16.7xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 2.9x 6.7xmedian 2.9x 3.2xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x 11.1xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.9xmedian 30.2x 22.7xmedian 30.2x 20.7xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 28.6xmedian 2.9x 10.7xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 3.68median 1.08 —median 1.08 2.62median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTAPSNDKUMC
Revenue $7.39B $28.97B $14.11B
Gross profit $5.22B $23.16B $2.67B
Operating income $1.85B $20.99B $1.81B
Net income $1.42B $19.42B $2.64B
Free cash flow $1.65B – $2.19B
R&D $1.02B $1.40B $595.72M
EPS (diluted) $7.09 $125.30 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $1.57B $5.14B $4.48B
Total debt $2.49B – $781.92M
Shares (diluted) 200.00M 155.00M 2.47B
Enterprise value $21.65B $168.29B $24.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTAPSNDKUMC
P/E 30.2x 10.1x 16.7x
P/FCF 25.9x 22.7x 20.7x
P/Operating cash flow 22.6x 11.1x 12.1x
P/S 5.8x 6.7x 3.2x
P/B 28.6x 10.7x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 29.4x 10.7x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA 20.5x – 11.1x
EV/EBIT 22.6x – 23.1x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 6.7x 3.0x
EV/FCF 25.3x – 19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.0x 11.1x 11.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.68 – 2.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTAPSNDKUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.2% 272.4% 87.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 22.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.2% 965.9% 22.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.9% – -2.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 35.6% 1,507% 29.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.3% – -6.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.1% 1,216% 97.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% – 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.9% 1,173% 97.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.2% – 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.2% 2,396% 19.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.0% – 5.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.5% – 410.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.5% – 11.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTAPSNDKUMC
Gross margin 70.6% – 18.9%
EBITDA margin 27.5% – 26.7%
Operating margin 25.0% – 12.8%
Pretax margin 24.7% – 30.5%
Net margin 19.2% – 18.7%
FCF margin 22.3% – 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 25.7% 60.6% 26.7%
Return on equity 99.6% 114.7% 18.4%
Return on assets 13.1% 80.4% 12.5%
Return on invested capital 36.7% – 11.6%
Return on capital employed 29.4% – 9.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.2x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.9x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% 0.9% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTAPSNDKUMC
Debt / assets 22.7% – 3.7%
Debt / equity 1.7x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – -1.0x
Debt / FCF 1.5x – 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 86.4% 29.7% 30.3%
Equity / assets 13.6% 70.3% 69.7%
Interest coverage – – 33.0x
Current ratio 1.2x 2.6x 3.3x
Quick ratio 1.0x – 2.6x
Cash ratio 0.8x – 2.0x
Altman Z-score 4.10 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTAPSNDKUMC
Dividend yield 1.0% – 2.2%
Net buyback yield 1.7% – 0.7%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 0.0% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTAPSNDKUMC
Forward P/E 20.8xFY2026 6.5xFY2027 16.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.50FY2026 $206.11FY2027 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.2%FY2026 +190.8%FY2027 +107.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.7% +36.1% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.49BFY2026 $50.93BFY2027 $8.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2026 +151.5%FY2027 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +10.4% +24.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTAPSNDKUMC
Held by institutions 97.4% – 7.1%
Institutions holding 960 – 363
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% – +3.2%
Institutions buying 502 – 220
Institutions selling 336 – 110
Buyers to sellers 1.49 – 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTAPSNDKUMC
NTAP 1.00 0.16 0.12
SNDK 0.16 1.00 0.42
UMC 0.12 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTAP, SNDK and UMC?

Sandisk (SNDK) is the largest by market capitalisation: NetApp (NTAP) $38.83B, Sandisk (SNDK) $168.29B, United Microelectronics (UMC) $40.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, NTAP, SNDK and UMC?

Sandisk (SNDK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (NetApp (NTAP) 27.4x, Sandisk (SNDK) 8.7x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 15.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sandisk (SNDK) is cheapest (NetApp (NTAP) 20.8x, Sandisk (SNDK) 6.5x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 16.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sandisk (SNDK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Sandisk (SNDK) +272.4%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +87.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 18.7%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sandisk (SNDK) returned the most: NetApp (NTAP) +91.4%, Sandisk (SNDK) +550.8%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +144.1%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (NetApp (NTAP) +19.6%/yr, United Microelectronics (UMC) +11.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (NetApp (NTAP) 44.9%, Sandisk (SNDK) 110.9%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 64.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTAP, SNDK and UMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sandisk (SNDK) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.