MT vs GGB vs STLD Stock Comparison

ArcelorMittal, Gerdau and Steel Dynamics Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SIM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MT ArcelorMittal
$59.37 -16.0% 1M +51.8% 1Y
Market cap
$46.61B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$62.85B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
1 win
GGB Gerdau S.A.
$4.74 -2.1% 1M +40.7% 1Y
Market cap
$9.30B
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.11B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
5 wins
STLD Steel Dynamics Inc
$237.55 +1.7% 1M +55.3% 1Y
Market cap
$35.25B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.22B
Div. yield
0.01%
Steel Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Gerdau leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Gerdau 5, Steel Dynamics 5, ArcelorMittal 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTGGBSTLDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $46.61B $9.30B $35.25B MT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.7x 17.2x 18.1x GGB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.8x 8.2x 13.9x GGB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.6% +103.8% +26.0% GGB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 3.2% 8.8% STLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.5% 11.6% 14.6% STLD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x -0.4x 1.0x GGB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.8% +40.7% +55.3% STLD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.2%/yr +4.1%/yr +29.8%/yr STLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.5% 37.1% 35.9% STLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 67/100 56/100 GGB

Percentile Scorecard

MTGGBSTLD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTGGBSTLD
Valuation 91 #15 of 162 88 #21 of 162 68 #52 of 162
Growth 32 #100 of 147 36 #94 of 147 51 #73 of 147
Profitability 54 #57 of 122 61 #48 of 122 63 #46 of 122
Financial Health 24 #125 of 165 55 #75 of 165 37 #104 of 165
Shareholder Returns 77 #25 of 107 93 #8 of 107 63 #40 of 107
Overall 56 67 56
  • MT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • GGB ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • STLD ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTGGBSTLDSPY
1 month -16.0%-2.1%+1.7% -0.8%
3 months -12.1%-1.7%-5.1% +3.5%
6 months +0.6%+9.7%+5.6% +7.0%
Year to date +30.3%+28.5%+40.2% +12.2%
1 year +51.8%+40.7%+55.3% +13.0%
3 years +168.2%+30.5%+128.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +39.0%+9.3%+31.7% +23.1%
5 years +78.1%+22.4%+268.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +12.2%+4.1%+29.8% +11.0%
10 years +194.1%+78.8%+793.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.4%+6.0%+24.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMTGGBSTLDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.5%37.1%35.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.8%39.1%36.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.091.221.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.191.101.54 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.8%-55.8%-32.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.6%-9.5%-16.0% -1.8%
52-week high $78.75$5.24$282.76 $779.14
52-week low $36.91$3.26$151.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTGGBSTLD
P/E now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 12.8x 17.6xmedian 12.8x 17.4xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 3.1x 0.6xmedian 3.1x 1.5xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 7.0x 3.8xmedian 7.0x 11.5xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 15.2x 68.5xmedian 15.2x 30.9xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.1x 0.9xmedian 2.1x 3.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.26median 0.29 4.85median 0.29 -3.13median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTGGBSTLD
Revenue $62.85B $17.11B $22.22B
Gross profit – $1.99B $3.53B
Operating income $2.68B $1.59B $2.56B
Net income $1.30B $546.25M $1.95B
Free cash flow $9.56B $138.65M $1.09B
EPS (diluted) $2.37 $0.42 $13.58
Cash & equivalents $4.85B $1.09B $928.56M
Total debt $16.31B $309.89M $4.20B
Shares (diluted) 766.00M 1.29B 143.62M
Enterprise value $25.63B $4.62B $32.06B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTGGBSTLD
P/E 25.0x 17.6x 17.4x
P/FCF 4.7x 68.5x 30.9x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x 5.6x 20.0x
P/S 0.7x 0.6x 1.5x
P/B 0.8x 0.9x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 0.9x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 9.7x 3.8x 11.5x
EV/EBIT 21.0x 5.4x 14.5x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 0.5x 1.7x
EV/FCF 5.9x 61.7x 33.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x 5.0x 21.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.26 4.85 -3.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTGGBSTLD
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.6% 103.8% 26.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.9% 1.6% 4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 39.0% 53.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -7.2% -6.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -32.2% 51.0% 82.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.6% -30.5% -9.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 446.8% -27.3% 72.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -33.1% -30.2% -10.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -25.0% 8.0% 77.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -19.9% 3.6% -5.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -4.9% 25.9% 11.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% -2.6% -23.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.4% -77.0% 252.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.6% -52.1% -22.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTGGBSTLD
Gross margin – 11.6% 15.9%
EBITDA margin 9.2% 13.3% 14.4%
Operating margin 4.3% 9.3% 11.5%
Pretax margin 3.3% 3.8% 11.2%
Net margin 2.9% 3.2% 8.8%
FCF margin 15.2% 0.8% 4.9%
Operating cash flow margin 7.5% 9.9% 7.6%
Return on equity 3.4% 3.5% 20.5%
Return on assets 1.9% 2.3% 11.2%
Return on invested capital 3.5% 11.6% 14.6%
Return on capital employed 3.5% 11.4% 17.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.1x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.6x 3.1x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTGGBSTLD
Debt / assets 16.4% 1.9% 23.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x -0.4x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 1.7x 2.2x 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 44.7% 34.9% 44.8%
Equity / assets 55.3% 65.1% 55.2%
Interest coverage – 4.1x 18.4x
Current ratio 1.4x 2.9x 3.1x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.2x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.6x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.06 5.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTGGBSTLD
Dividend yield 1.2% 3.2% 0.9%
Net buyback yield – 3.5% 2.5%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 6.7% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 15.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 27.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTGGBSTLD
Forward P/E 23.8xFY2026 8.2xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.49FY2026 $0.58FY2026 $17.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -39.4%FY2026 +346.2%FY2026 +114.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +179.5% +3.4% +20.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $63.40BFY2026 $14.44BFY2026 $22.96BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.3% -4.1% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTGGBSTLD
Held by institutions 4.9% 18.0% 82.7%
Institutions holding 317 211 1,022
Change in shares held, QoQ +29.8% +17.1% +1.2%
Institutions buying 150 119 501
Institutions selling 112 52 370
Buyers to sellers 1.34 2.29 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTGGBSTLD
MT 1.00 0.54 0.53
GGB 0.54 1.00 0.56
STLD 0.53 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MT, GGB and STLD?

ArcelorMittal (MT) is the largest by market capitalisation: ArcelorMittal (MT) $46.61B, Gerdau (GGB) $9.30B, Steel Dynamics (STLD) $35.25B.

Which stock is cheaper, MT, GGB and STLD?

Gerdau (GGB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ArcelorMittal (MT) 25.7x, Gerdau (GGB) 17.2x, Steel Dynamics (STLD) 18.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gerdau (GGB) is cheapest (ArcelorMittal (MT) 23.8x, Gerdau (GGB) 8.2x, Steel Dynamics (STLD) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gerdau (GGB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ArcelorMittal (MT) +3.6%, Gerdau (GGB) +103.8%, Steel Dynamics (STLD) +26.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Steel Dynamics (STLD) has the highest net margin (ArcelorMittal (MT) 2.9%, Gerdau (GGB) 3.2%, Steel Dynamics (STLD) 8.8%). On return on invested capital, Steel Dynamics (STLD) leads (ArcelorMittal (MT) 3.5%, Gerdau (GGB) 11.6%, Steel Dynamics (STLD) 14.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Steel Dynamics (STLD) returned the most: ArcelorMittal (MT) +51.8%, Gerdau (GGB) +40.7%, Steel Dynamics (STLD) +55.3%. Over five years, Steel Dynamics (STLD) compounded fastest (ArcelorMittal (MT) +12.2%/yr, Gerdau (GGB) +4.1%/yr, Steel Dynamics (STLD) +29.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ArcelorMittal (MT) 0.00%, Gerdau (GGB) 0.00%, Steel Dynamics (STLD) 0.01%. ArcelorMittal (MT) and Gerdau (GGB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Steel Dynamics (STLD) has been the steadiest (ArcelorMittal (MT) 43.5%, Gerdau (GGB) 37.1%, Steel Dynamics (STLD) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MT, GGB and STLD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gerdau (GGB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.