MDLN vs RVP vs ACU Stock Comparison

Medline, Retractable Technologies and Acme United Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BDX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MDLN Medline Inc.
$33.63 -5.6% 1M
Market cap
$29.31B
P/E
35.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.57B
Div. yield
–
Medical Supplies Healthcare
4 wins
ACU Acme United Corp
$68.99 +8.5% 1M +81.5% 1Y
Market cap
$264.57M
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$211.60M
Div. yield
–
Medical Supplies Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Acme United leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Acme United 5, Medline 4, Retractable Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMDLNRVPACULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.31B $16.91M $264.57M MDLN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.0x -4.7x 27.0x ACU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.4x — 25.1x MDLN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -11.2% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% -10.6% — MDLN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.4% -31.4% — MDLN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 2.6x — RVP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -35.1% +81.5% ACU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -42.9%/yr +12.9%/yr ACU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.5% 40.2% 30.8% ACU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 53/100 70/100 ACU

Percentile Scorecard

MDLNRVPACU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMDLNRVPACU
Valuation 85 #36 of 227 72 #64 of 227 87 #31 of 227
Growth – 34 #145 of 218 –
Profitability 74 #54 of 202 40 #121 of 202 –
Financial Health 41 #137 of 233 64 #84 of 233 59 #96 of 233
Shareholder Returns 72 #37 of 130 – 65 #46 of 130
Overall 68 53 70
  • MDLN ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • RVP ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ACU ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMDLNRVPACUSPY
1 month -5.6%-18.6%+8.5% -2.3%
3 months -16.9%-14.9%+19.8% -0.7%
6 months -23.9%-12.3%+68.9% +4.8%
Year to date -19.9%-26.2%+71.1% +10.3%
1 year —-35.1%+81.5% +10.3%
3 years —-48.6%+108.5% +73.0%
3 years, per year —-19.9%+27.8% +20.1%
5 years —-93.9%+83.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year —-42.9%+12.9% +10.1%
10 years —-78.2%+220.9% +258.6%
10 years, per year —-14.1%+12.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMDLNRVPACUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.5%40.2%30.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.3%44.8%24.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.150.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.872.65 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.7%-93.9%-42.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.7%-35.3%0.0% -3.5%
52-week high $49.99$0.88$68.99 $779.14
52-week low $31.64$0.57$35.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMDLNRVPACU
P/E now vs peer median 32.8xmedian 28.7x -4.8xmedian 28.7x 24.8xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 3.0x 0.5xmedian 3.0x 1.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 17.8x 1.5xmedian 17.8x —median 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.4xmedian 26.4x -3.4xmedian 26.4x 15.8xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.4x 0.2xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.99 0.22median 0.99 —median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMDLNRVPACU
Revenue $28.57B $33.90M $211.60M
Gross profit $7.79B -$491.51K $84.82M
Operating income $2.03B -$22.68M $14.48M
Net income $1.03B -$3.37M $9.82M
Free cash flow $1.59B -$5.11M $15.48M
R&D – $682.03K –
EPS (diluted) $0.97 $-0.12 $2.37
Cash & equivalents $2.33B $2.64M $5.04M
Total debt $12.58B $715.92K $32.33M
Shares (diluted) 861.00M 29.94M 4.14M
Enterprise value $22.25B -$129.49M $246.59M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMDLNRVPACU
P/E 32.8x -4.8x 24.8x
P/FCF 26.4x -3.4x 15.8x
P/Operating cash flow 21.0x -3.5x –
P/S 1.5x 0.5x 1.2x
P/B 2.2x 0.2x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 7.6x 0.2x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 16.8x 1.5x –
EV/EBIT 25.6x 1.0x –
EV/Revenue 1.8x -0.6x –
EV/FCF 32.7x 4.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 25.9x 4.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.22 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMDLNRVPACU
Revenue growth (1Y) – -11.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -14.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 81.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -26.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -2.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -11.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 61.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -23.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 59.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -21.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 58.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -16.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 62.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 20.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMDLNRVPACU
Gross margin 27.3% -1.4% –
EBITDA margin 10.8% -43.9% –
Operating margin 7.1% -66.9% –
Pretax margin 4.3% -9.9% –
Net margin 2.9% -10.6% –
FCF margin 5.6% -15.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.0% -14.6% –
Return on equity 5.4% -4.7% –
Return on assets 2.6% -2.4% –
Return on invested capital 5.4% -31.4% –
Return on capital employed 5.6% -18.0% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMDLNRVPACU
Debt / assets 32.0% 0.5% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 2.6x –
Debt / FCF 7.9x -0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 51.5% 48.6% 39.9%
Equity / assets 48.5% 51.4% 60.1%
Interest coverage – -278.8x –
Current ratio 4.3x 4.9x 3.9x
Quick ratio 2.3x 3.7x –
Cash ratio 1.0x 3.0x –
Altman Z-score 2.42 0.43 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMDLNRVPACU
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMDLNRVPACU
Forward P/E 23.4xFY2026 – 25.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.44FY2026 – $2.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +0.7%FY2026 – +10.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.9% – +4.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.52BFY2026 – $217.65MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.4%FY2026 – +10.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.0% – +0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMDLNRVPACU
Held by institutions 85.5% 8.8% 73.5%
Institutions holding 408 32 84
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.9% +5.9% +1.3%
Institutions buying 322 10 47
Institutions selling 69 4 21
Buyers to sellers 4.67 2.50 2.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MDLNRVPACU
MDLN 1.00 0.12 0.25
RVP 0.12 1.00 0.06
ACU 0.25 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MDLN, RVP and ACU?

Medline (MDLN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Medline (MDLN) $29.31B, Retractable Technologies (RVP) $16.91M, Acme United (ACU) $264.57M.

Which stock is cheaper, MDLN, RVP and ACU?

Acme United (ACU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Medline (MDLN) 35.0x, Retractable Technologies (RVP) -4.7x, Acme United (ACU) 27.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Medline (MDLN) is cheapest (Medline (MDLN) 23.4x, Acme United (ACU) 25.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is more profitable?

Medline (MDLN) has the highest net margin (Medline (MDLN) 2.9%, Retractable Technologies (RVP) -10.6%). On return on invested capital, Medline (MDLN) leads (Medline (MDLN) 5.4%, Retractable Technologies (RVP) -31.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Acme United (ACU) returned the most: Retractable Technologies (RVP) -35.1%, Acme United (ACU) +81.5%. Over five years, Acme United (ACU) compounded fastest (Retractable Technologies (RVP) -42.9%/yr, Acme United (ACU) +12.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Acme United (ACU) has been the steadiest (Medline (MDLN) 44.5%, Retractable Technologies (RVP) 40.2%, Acme United (ACU) 30.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MDLN, RVP and ACU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Acme United (ACU) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.