MDB vs NTAP vs SMCI Stock Comparison

MongoDB, NetApp and Super Micro Computer Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ESTC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MDB MongoDB, Inc.
$384.95 +14.2% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$28.25B
P/E
479.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.78B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
1 win
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$218.42 +4.4% 1M +91.4% 1Y
Market cap
$38.83B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
5 wins
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.
$34.43 -16.1% 1M -34.7% 1Y
Market cap
$19.56B
P/E
8.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$39.06B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 5, Super Micro Computer 4, MongoDB 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMDBNTAPSMCILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $28.25B $38.83B $19.56B NTAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 479.6x 27.4x 8.8x SMCI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 55.0x 20.8x 7.6x SMCI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +25.5% +12.2% +77.8% SMCI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.1% 19.2% 5.7% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 36.7% 17.0% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.5x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.0% +91.4% -34.7% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.9%/yr +19.6%/yr +57.7%/yr SMCI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 72.7% 44.9% 95.8% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 58/100 57/100 MDB

Percentile Scorecard

MDBNTAPSMCI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMDBNTAPSMCI
Valuation 46 #68 of 124 41 #67 of 112 68 #37 of 112
Growth 98 #3 of 113 53 #51 of 108 73 #30 of 108
Profitability 70 #33 of 109 93 #8 of 104 55 #47 of 104
Financial Health 80 #26 of 127 29 #83 of 116 68 #38 of 116
Shareholder Returns 69 #20 of 63 73 #22 of 78 23 #60 of 78
Overall 73 58 57
  • MDB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SMCI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMDBNTAPSMCISPY
1 month +14.2%+4.4%-16.1% +0.7%
3 months +18.1%+25.5%+24.2% +3.7%
6 months +53.5%+97.2%+25.7% +7.1%
Year to date -8.3%+104.0%+17.6% +12.8%
1 year +13.0%+91.4%-34.7% +11.9%
3 years +14.5%+206.9%+45.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +4.6%+45.4%+13.3% +22.8%
5 years -26.2%+144.6%+872.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -5.9%+19.6%+57.7% +10.9%
10 years —+547.0%+1,311.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+20.5%+30.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMDBNTAPSMCISPY
Volatility, 1Y 72.7%44.9%95.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 76.8%38.9%97.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.911.384.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.182.04-0.36 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.5%-43.5%-84.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.5%-8.7%-34.7% -1.2%
52-week high $472.29$239.18$52.69 $779.14
52-week low $225.95$94.11$20.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMDBNTAPSMCI
P/E now vs peer median 526.1xmedian 39.0x 30.2xmedian 32.9x 9.3xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 4.6x 5.8xmedian 2.9x 0.6xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 2,315xmedian 32.7x 20.5xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 47.1xmedian 27.4x 25.9xmedian 30.2x -3.2xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 3.2x 28.6xmedian 2.9x 1.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 17.45median 1.23 3.68median 1.08 0.23median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMDBNTAPSMCI
Revenue $2.78B $7.39B $39.06B
Gross profit $2.02B $5.22B $4.23B
Operating income -$14.52M $1.85B $2.77B
Net income $58.90M $1.42B $2.23B
Free cash flow $659.02M $1.65B -$6.97B
R&D $780.02M $1.02B $771.23M
EPS (diluted) $0.72 $7.09 $3.20
Cash & equivalents $1.00B $1.57B $7.52B
Total debt – $2.49B $2.00B
Shares (diluted) 82.00M 200.00M 697.35M
Enterprise value $18.72B $21.65B $2.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMDBNTAPSMCI
P/E 526.1x 30.2x 9.3x
P/FCF 47.1x 25.9x -3.2x
P/Operating cash flow 46.5x 22.6x -3.3x
P/S 11.1x 5.8x 0.6x
P/B 10.4x 28.6x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 10.5x 29.4x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 2,315x 20.5x –
EV/EBIT -1,969x 22.6x 6.2x
EV/Revenue 10.3x 5.6x 0.4x
EV/FCF 43.4x 25.3x -2.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 42.9x 22.0x -2.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 17.45 3.68 0.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMDBNTAPSMCI
Revenue growth (1Y) 25.5% 12.2% 77.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.2% 6.0% 76.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.1% 13.2% 74.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.5% 7.9% 48.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 91.2% 35.6% 121.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% 25.3% 53.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 174.9% 21.1% 112.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.9% 5.5% 51.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 174.1% 22.9% 91.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.1% 8.2% 40.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 146.9% 3.2% -510.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 139.5% 14.0% -130.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 174.7% -0.5% -555.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 144.3% 15.5% -135.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMDBNTAPSMCI
Gross margin 72.7% 70.6% 10.8%
EBITDA margin 0.4% 27.5% –
Operating margin -0.5% 25.0% 7.1%
Pretax margin 2.7% 24.7% 7.1%
Net margin 2.1% 19.2% 5.7%
FCF margin 23.7% 22.3% -17.8%
Operating cash flow margin 24.0% 25.7% -17.4%
Return on equity 2.0% 99.6% 20.2%
Return on assets 1.6% 13.1% 8.4%
Return on invested capital – 36.7% 17.0%
Return on capital employed -0.5% 29.4% 14.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 11.3x 1.3x -3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 20.3% 5.4% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMDBNTAPSMCI
Debt / assets – 22.7% 6.7%
Debt / equity – 1.7x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.5x –
Debt / FCF – 1.5x -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 21.1% 86.4% 51.6%
Equity / assets 78.9% 13.6% 48.4%
Interest coverage -6.1x – 14.2x
Current ratio 4.9x 1.2x 3.9x
Quick ratio 4.5x 1.0x 1.9x
Cash ratio 3.8x 0.8x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 24.15 4.10 3.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMDBNTAPSMCI
Dividend yield – 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 1.2% 1.7% -6.4%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 2.7% -6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMDBNTAPSMCI
Forward P/E 55.0xFY2026 20.8xFY2026 7.6xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $7.00FY2026 $10.50FY2026 $4.52FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +40.8%FY2026 +29.2%FY2026 +24.5%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +6.4% +8.7% +21.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.89BFY2026 $8.49BFY2026 $74.04BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +17.5%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026 +89.6%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +33.4% +8.6% +5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMDBNTAPSMCI
Held by institutions 92.6% 97.4% 68.0%
Institutions holding 871 960 775
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.3% -1.0% +32.3%
Institutions buying 494 502 451
Institutions selling 278 336 233
Buyers to sellers 1.78 1.49 1.94

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MDBNTAPSMCI
MDB 1.00 0.23 0.15
NTAP 0.23 1.00 0.37
SMCI 0.15 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MDB, NTAP and SMCI?

NetApp (NTAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: MongoDB (MDB) $28.25B, NetApp (NTAP) $38.83B, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) $19.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, MDB, NTAP and SMCI?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (MongoDB (MDB) 479.6x, NetApp (NTAP) 27.4x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 8.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) is cheapest (MongoDB (MDB) 55.0x, NetApp (NTAP) 20.8x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 7.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: MongoDB (MDB) +25.5%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +77.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (MongoDB (MDB) 2.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 5.7%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 17.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: MongoDB (MDB) +13.0%, NetApp (NTAP) +91.4%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) -34.7%. Over five years, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) compounded fastest (MongoDB (MDB) -5.9%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +19.6%/yr, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +57.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (MongoDB (MDB) 72.7%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.9%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 95.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MDB, NTAP and SMCI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.