MCHP vs TSEM vs UMC Stock Comparison

Microchip Technology, Tower Semiconductor and United Microelectronics Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MCHP Microchip Technology Inc
$76.11 -6.4% 1M +21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$41.33B
P/E
112.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.12B
Div. yield
2.41%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
2 wins
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd
$155.32 -35.5% 1M +82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.48B
P/E
46.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
3 wins
UMC United Microelectronics Corp
$16.40 -37.6% 1M +112.7% 1Y
Market cap
$41.29B
P/E
15.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.11B
Div. yield
2.44%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

United Microelectronics leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (United Microelectronics 7, Tower Semiconductor 3, Microchip Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCHPTSEMUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $41.33B $17.48B $41.29B MCHP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 112.4x 46.2x 15.2x UMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 41.4x 14.9x UMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.9% +21.6% +87.7% UMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.2% 20.5% 18.7% TSEM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.5% 10.7% 11.6% UMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x -1.9x -1.0x TSEM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.41% — 2.44% UMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.9% +82.4% +112.7% UMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.9%/yr +35.5%/yr +9.0%/yr TSEM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.8% 85.0% 65.2% MCHP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 77/100 81/100 UMC

Percentile Scorecard

MCHPTSEMUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCHPTSEMUMC
Valuation 50 #48 of 94 72 #27 of 94 94 #7 of 94
Growth 41 #55 of 92 79 #20 of 92 78 #21 of 92
Profitability 60 #37 of 90 78 #21 of 90 72 #26 of 90
Financial Health 5 #96 of 101 79 #22 of 101 67 #34 of 101
Shareholder Returns 47 #40 of 74 – 93 #6 of 74
Overall 40 77 81
  • MCHP ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • TSEM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • UMC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCHPTSEMUMCSPY
1 month -6.4%-35.5%-37.6% -2.3%
3 months +1.2%-33.7%-12.2% -0.7%
6 months -20.1%-27.8%+26.3% +4.8%
Year to date +19.4%+32.3%+108.7% +10.3%
1 year +21.9%+82.4%+112.7% +10.3%
3 years -0.4%+546.6%+112.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year -0.1%+86.4%+28.6% +20.1%
5 years -4.6%+355.6%+53.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year -0.9%+35.5%+9.0% +10.1%
10 years +154.3%+906.0%+777.0% +258.6%
10 years, per year +9.8%+26.0%+24.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMCHPTSEMUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.8%85.0%65.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.6%79.5%57.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.183.361.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.440.971.73 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.5%-55.4%-57.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.0%-51.0%-41.4% -3.5%
52-week high $102.92$316.85$28.01 $779.14
52-week low $49.02$82.45$7.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCHPTSEMUMC
P/E now vs peer median 112.4xmedian 41.3x 46.2xmedian 41.3x 15.2xmedian 41.3x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 6.6x 9.5xmedian 6.6x 2.9xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 26.2x 23.5xmedian 26.2x 10.0xmedian 26.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 41.9xmedian 37.7x 11.2xmedian 37.7x 18.8xmedian 37.7x
P/B now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 4.3x 5.4xmedian 4.3x 2.8xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median -2.42median 1.81 -3.70median 1.81 2.38median 1.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCHPTSEMUMC
Revenue $5.12B $1.84B $14.11B
Gross profit $3.08B $545.09M $2.67B
Operating income $794.80M $352.82M $1.81B
Net income $478.40M $358.28M $2.64B
Free cash flow $985.70M $1.56B $2.19B
R&D $1.14B $98.57M $595.72M
EPS (diluted) $0.67 $3.32 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $272.30M $250.75M $4.48B
Total debt $5.36B $153.73M $781.92M
Shares (diluted) 550.50M 113.60M 2.47B
Enterprise value $40.33B $11.87B $25.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCHPTSEMUMC
P/E 112.4x 46.2x 15.2x
P/FCF 41.9x 11.2x 18.8x
P/Operating cash flow 34.5x 19.2x 11.0x
P/S 8.1x 9.5x 2.9x
P/B 6.4x 5.4x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 9.3x 5.4x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x 23.5x 10.0x
EV/EBIT 58.4x 45.8x 20.8x
EV/Revenue 9.1x 8.8x 2.7x
EV/FCF 47.1x 10.4x 17.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 38.7x 17.7x 10.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.42 -3.70 2.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCHPTSEMUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.9% 21.6% 87.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -16.4% 7.7% 22.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.6% 63.6% 22.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -19.7% 11.4% -2.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 627.2% 107.8% 29.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -37.9% -16.3% -6.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 422.4% 86.3% 97.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -41.6% -13.6% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 301.6% 64.7% 97.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -46.5% -12.5% 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 50.4% 99.6% 19.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.8% 10.1% 5.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 67.1% 77.7% 410.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.4% 15.2% 11.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCHPTSEMUMC
Gross margin 60.2% 29.6% 18.9%
EBITDA margin 29.3% 37.4% 26.7%
Operating margin 15.5% 19.2% 12.8%
Pretax margin 11.3% 21.8% 30.5%
Net margin 7.2% 20.5% 18.7%
FCF margin 19.2% 84.6% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 23.4% 49.5% 26.7%
Return on equity 7.4% 11.4% 18.4%
Return on assets 3.3% 9.2% 12.5%
Return on invested capital 5.5% 10.7% 11.6%
Return on capital employed 6.1% 10.5% 9.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 2.5x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% – 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCHPTSEMUMC
Debt / assets 37.2% 3.8% 3.7%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x -1.9x -1.0x
Debt / FCF 5.4x 0.1x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 55.2% 20.1% 30.3%
Equity / assets 44.8% 79.9% 69.7%
Interest coverage 3.7x – 33.0x
Current ratio 1.9x 3.7x 3.3x
Quick ratio 1.0x 3.1x 2.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 2.7x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 4.23 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCHPTSEMUMC
Dividend yield 2.4% – 2.4%
Net buyback yield -0.2% – 0.7%
Shareholder yield 2.3% – 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 206.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 100.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCHPTSEMUMC
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 41.4xFY2026 14.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.80FY2026 $3.75FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +131.7%FY2026 +63.8%FY2026 +107.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.9% +74.1% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.62BFY2026 $1.86BFY2026 $8.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +40.6%FY2026 +18.5%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.4% +56.6% +24.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCHPTSEMUMC
Held by institutions 100.0% 55.6% 7.1%
Institutions holding 1,286 451 364
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.0% -10.0% +3.2%
Institutions buying 682 244 220
Institutions selling 433 162 110
Buyers to sellers 1.58 1.51 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCHPTSEMUMC
MCHP 1.00 0.48 0.40
TSEM 0.48 1.00 0.42
UMC 0.40 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCHP, TSEM and UMC?

Microchip Technology (MCHP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Microchip Technology (MCHP) $41.33B, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) $17.48B, United Microelectronics (UMC) $41.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCHP, TSEM and UMC?

United Microelectronics (UMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Microchip Technology (MCHP) 112.4x, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 46.2x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 15.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, United Microelectronics (UMC) is cheapest (Microchip Technology (MCHP) 20.0x, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 41.4x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 14.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Microelectronics (UMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Microchip Technology (MCHP) +20.9%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) +21.6%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +87.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) has the highest net margin (Microchip Technology (MCHP) 7.2%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 20.5%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 18.7%). On return on invested capital, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads (Microchip Technology (MCHP) 5.5%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 10.7%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Microelectronics (UMC) returned the most: Microchip Technology (MCHP) +21.9%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) +82.4%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +112.7%. Over five years, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) compounded fastest (Microchip Technology (MCHP) -0.9%/yr, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) +35.5%/yr, United Microelectronics (UMC) +9.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

United Microelectronics (UMC) has the highest dividend yield: Microchip Technology (MCHP) 2.41%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 2.44%. Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microchip Technology (MCHP) has been the steadiest (Microchip Technology (MCHP) 49.8%, Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) 85.0%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 65.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCHP, TSEM and UMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.