LVWR vs HOG vs MCFT Stock Comparison

LiveWire, Harley-Davidson and MasterCraft Boat Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NIU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LVWR LiveWire Group, Inc.
$0.54 -67.1% 1M -89.7% 1Y
Market cap
$110.92M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$33.45M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc.
$32.60 +20.9% 1M +28.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.29B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
2.30%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Harley-Davidson leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Harley-Davidson 6, MasterCraft Boat Holdings 2, LiveWire 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLVWRHOGMCFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $110.92M $3.29B $357.16M HOG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.5x -25.5x -214.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 40.7x 10.6x MCFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% -14.6% +22.8% LVWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -217.0% -3.3% -0.5% MCFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -88.0% -4.0% — HOG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 2.30% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -89.7% +28.2% -3.0% HOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -44.0%/yr -3.1%/yr -6.0%/yr HOG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 164.6% 39.4% 40.2% HOG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 55/100 46/100 HOG

Percentile Scorecard

LVWRHOGMCFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLVWRHOGMCFT
Valuation 6 #46 of 49 58 #21 of 49 48 #26 of 49
Growth 83 #9 of 49 4 #47 of 49 15 #42 of 49
Profitability 9 #43 of 47 46 #26 of 47 57 #21 of 47
Financial Health 42 #31 of 53 71 #16 of 53 79 #12 of 53
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 93 #3 of 30 35 #20 of 30
Overall 33 55 46
  • LVWR ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • HOG ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MCFT ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLVWRHOGMCFTSPY
1 month -67.1%+20.9%+7.2% -5.9%
3 months -51.8%+26.9%-14.7% -4.6%
6 months -67.7%+37.9%-18.6% +0.2%
Year to date -87.8%+59.1%+10.0% +7.5%
1 year -89.7%+28.2%-3.0% +8.2%
3 years -94.5%+17.4%-4.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year -62.0%+5.5%-1.3% +19.0%
5 years -94.5%-14.5%-26.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year -44.0%-3.1%-6.0% +9.4%
10 years —-41.7%+81.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year —-5.2%+6.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureLVWRHOGMCFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 164.6%39.4%40.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 152.6%36.0%40.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.380.820.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.550.72-0.08 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.6%-66.8%-57.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -89.7%-5.8%-24.0% -5.9%
52-week high $5.26$34.59$27.38 $779.14
52-week low $0.54$17.19$17.21 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLVWRHOGMCFT
P/E now vs peer median -1.5xmedian 20.2x -25.5xmedian 20.2x -214.9xmedian 20.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 0.5x 0.8xmedian 0.5x 1.0xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 8.3x —median 8.3x 25.0xmedian 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 9.9x 10.6xmedian 9.9x 16.0xmedian 9.9x
P/B now vs peer median -20.1xmedian 0.9x 1.1xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.15median 0.73 0.82median 0.73 8.11median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLVWRHOGMCFT
Revenue $33.45M $3.98B $348.90M
Gross profit -$871.00K $1.26B $79.78M
Operating income -$70.94M -$224.25M -$1.11M
Net income -$72.58M -$138.51M -$1.66M
Free cash flow -$49.80M $311.94M $22.38M
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 $-1.24 $-0.10
Cash & equivalents $39.92M $2.08B $43.87M
Total debt $76.82M $2.34B –
Shares (diluted) 205.41M 106.59M 17.16M
Enterprise value -$132.17M -$5.56B $80.16M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLVWRHOGMCFT
P/E -1.5x -25.5x -214.9x
P/FCF -2.2x 10.6x 16.0x
P/Operating cash flow -2.4x 7.7x 11.7x
P/S 3.3x 0.8x 1.0x
P/B -20.1x 1.1x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -11.9x 1.1x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA -2.4x – 25.0x
EV/EBIT -2.1x -15.9x -281.2x
EV/Revenue 4.4x 0.9x 0.9x
EV/FCF -3.0x 11.4x 14.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.2x 8.3x 10.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.15 0.82 8.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLVWRHOGMCFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% -14.6% 22.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -12.4% -19.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 91.2% -34.1% 40.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -36.0% -21.1% -22.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.5% -140.5% -109.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% -31.6% -26.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% -128.1% -123.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.8% -30.0% -26.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.3% -130.1% -122.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -31.0% -26.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% -22.2% -20.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% -14.3% -39.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.5% -20.4% -22.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.1% -13.1% -41.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLVWRHOGMCFT
Gross margin -2.6% 31.5% 22.9%
EBITDA margin -183.2% – 3.6%
Operating margin -212.1% -5.6% -0.3%
Pretax margin -218.7% -3.7% 0.4%
Net margin -217.0% -3.3% -0.5%
FCF margin -148.9% 7.8% 6.4%
Operating cash flow margin -138.2% 10.7% 8.7%
Return on equity -2,269% -4.5% -0.6%
Return on assets -65.5% -1.9% -0.4%
Return on invested capital -88.0% -4.0% –
Return on capital employed -78.3% -4.5% -0.4%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x -3.1x -18.4x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLVWRHOGMCFT
Debt / assets 74.0% 32.1% –
Debt / equity -13.9x 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x – –
Debt / FCF -1.5x 7.5x –
Liabilities / assets 105.3% 58.2% 23.8%
Equity / assets -5.3% 41.8% 76.2%
Interest coverage -15.3x -0.9x -5.2x
Current ratio 3.1x 2.0x 1.6x
Quick ratio 2.2x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.9x 0.4x
Altman Z-score -5.63 2.01 2.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLVWRHOGMCFT
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield 0.2% 10.7% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.2% 13.0% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLVWRHOGMCFT
Forward P/E – 40.7xFY2026 10.6xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.26FY2026 $0.80FY2026 $1.96FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – -71.2%FY2026 +11.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +146.3% +16.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $192.71MFY2026 $4.08BFY2026 $662.23MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +650.7%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026 +89.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +96.9% +3.7% -6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLVWRHOGMCFT
Held by institutions 2.0% 100.0% 72.9%
Institutions holding 62 441 154
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% +3.1% +14.6%
Institutions buying 32 219 110
Institutions selling 20 122 27
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.80 4.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LVWRHOGMCFT
LVWR 1.00 0.00 0.12
HOG 0.00 1.00 0.40
MCFT 0.12 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LVWR, HOG and MCFT?

Harley-Davidson (HOG) is the largest by market capitalisation: LiveWire (LVWR) $110.92M, Harley-Davidson (HOG) $3.29B, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) $357.16M.

Which company is growing faster?

LiveWire (LVWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LiveWire (LVWR) +33.4%, Harley-Davidson (HOG) -14.6%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) +22.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) has the highest net margin (LiveWire (LVWR) -217.0%, Harley-Davidson (HOG) -3.3%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -0.5%). On return on invested capital, Harley-Davidson (HOG) leads (LiveWire (LVWR) -88.0%, Harley-Davidson (HOG) -4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Harley-Davidson (HOG) returned the most: LiveWire (LVWR) -89.7%, Harley-Davidson (HOG) +28.2%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -3.0%. Over five years, Harley-Davidson (HOG) compounded fastest (LiveWire (LVWR) -44.0%/yr, Harley-Davidson (HOG) -3.1%/yr, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: LiveWire (LVWR) 0.00%, Harley-Davidson (HOG) 2.30%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 0.00%. LiveWire (LVWR) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Harley-Davidson (HOG) has been the steadiest (LiveWire (LVWR) 164.6%, Harley-Davidson (HOG) 39.4%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 40.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LVWR, HOG and MCFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Harley-Davidson (HOG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.