LTSV vs RHP vs PK Stock Comparison

Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV, Ryman Hospitality Properties and Park Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Sep 11, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RLJ) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ryman Hospitality Properties leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Ryman Hospitality Properties 9, Park Hotels & Resorts 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLTSVRHPPKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.87M $8.52B $3.39B RHP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.1x 31.3x -20.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 34.3x 34.4x RHP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.7% +12.2% -1.4% RHP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.2% 9.9% -6.4% RHP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.9% 0.7% RHP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.2x 10.9x RHP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.56% 5.93% PK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +55.3% +63.8% PK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +8.2%/yr -3.4%/yr RHP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year — 23.7% 30.3% RHP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 60/100 41/100 RHP

Percentile Scorecard

LTSVRHPPK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLTSVRHPPK
Valuation 23 #112 of 145 52 #70 of 145 69 #45 of 145
Growth 87 #20 of 144 71 #43 of 144 4 #139 of 144
Profitability 9 #127 of 140 81 #28 of 140 25 #105 of 140
Financial Health 3 #141 of 146 26 #108 of 146 26 #109 of 146
Shareholder Returns 80 #27 of 132 70 #41 of 132 83 #23 of 132
Overall 41 60 41
  • LTSV ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • RHP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • PK ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLTSVRHPPKSPY
1 month -10.0%+10.9%+8.6% -2.3%
3 months -15.6%+2.5%+11.4% -0.7%
6 months -17.4%+28.0%+52.6% +4.8%
Year to date -10.0%+42.6%+61.1% +10.3%
1 year —+55.3%+63.8% +10.3%
3 years —+47.1%+22.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+13.7%+7.0% +20.1%
5 years —+48.3%-15.9% +61.9%
5 years, per year —+8.2%-3.4% +10.1%
10 years —+159.9%— +258.6%
10 years, per year —+10.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLTSVRHPPKSPY
Volatility, 1Y —23.7%30.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y —22.4%27.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y —0.520.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —2.332.11 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.3%-34.8%-58.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.4%-0.8%-0.8% -3.5%
52-week high $3.67$136.00$16.99 $779.14
52-week low $2.63$88.75$9.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLTSVRHPPK
P/E now vs peer median -7.1xmedian 26.3x 31.3xmedian 26.3x -20.7xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.2x 3.1xmedian 4.2x 1.3xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 14.4x 14.1xmedian 14.4x 21.0xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.3xmedian 23.9x 31.0xmedian 23.9x 41.9xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 10.8xmedian 1.3x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.30median 1.98 21.61median 1.98 0.38median 1.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLTSVRHPPK
Revenue $30.33M $2.74B $2.54B
Gross profit $10.63M $1.20B $756.00M
Operating income -$14.09M $543.81M $52.00M
Net income -$3.43M $279.90M -$159.00M
Free cash flow -$603.00K $274.66M $81.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.38 $3.99 $-0.82
Cash & equivalents $10.94M $366.13M $264.00M
Total debt – $3.97B $3.92B
Shares (diluted) 8.11M 68.14M 200.00M
Enterprise value -$7.94M $7.22B $2.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLTSVRHPPK
P/E -7.1x 31.3x -20.7x
P/FCF -36.3x 31.0x 41.9x
P/Operating cash flow 62.7x 12.3x 8.4x
P/S 0.7x 3.1x 1.3x
P/B 1.0x 10.8x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 10.8x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA -1.2x 14.1x 21.0x
EV/EBIT -0.8x 22.3x 135.5x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 4.4x 2.8x
EV/FCF -18.1x 44.1x 87.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.3x 17.5x 17.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.30 21.61 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLTSVRHPPK
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.7% 12.2% -1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.5% -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.4% 10.7% 1.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.4% -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.7% 12.8% -79.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 7.2% -31.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 49.2% 3.1% -333.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 5.3% -61.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.6% -0.1% -379.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 1.4% -54.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 155.1% 14.3% -2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 10.9% -4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 66.4% 37.2% -56.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 74.1% -9.0% -29.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLTSVRHPPK
Gross margin 35.1% 43.8% 29.8%
EBITDA margin -30.1% 31.2% 13.2%
Operating margin -46.5% 19.8% 2.0%
Pretax margin -78.8% 10.7% -5.7%
Net margin -10.2% 9.9% -6.4%
FCF margin -2.0% 10.0% 3.2%
Operating cash flow margin 1.2% 25.2% 15.9%
Return on equity -15.4% 35.9% -5.1%
Return on assets -2.5% 4.5% -2.0%
Return on invested capital – 10.9% 0.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 2.5x -2.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLTSVRHPPK
Debt / assets – 64.1% 50.8%
Debt / equity – 5.0x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.2x 10.9x
Debt / FCF – 14.5x 48.3x
Liabilities / assets 83.8% 87.2% 59.9%
Equity / assets 16.2% 12.8% 40.1%
Interest coverage -1.4x 2.1x 0.3x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLTSVRHPPK
Dividend yield – 3.6% 5.9%
Net buyback yield 3.5% – –
Shareholder yield 3.5% 3.6% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 107.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 109.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 69.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLTSVRHPPK
Forward P/E – 34.3xFY2026 34.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.93FY2026 $0.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +4.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +20.6% +12.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.84BFY2026 $2.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +10.1%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.0% +2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLTSVRHPPK
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 435 397
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.2% +9.7%
Institutions buying – 233 218
Institutions selling – 137 114
Buyers to sellers – 1.70 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LTSVRHPPK
LTSV – – –
RHP – 1.00 0.69
PK – 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LTSV, RHP and PK?

Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) $21.87M, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) $8.52B, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) $3.39B.

Which company is growing faster?

Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -0.7%, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) +12.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) has the highest net margin (Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) -10.2%, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) 9.9%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) leads (Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) 10.9%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) returned the most: Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) +55.3%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) +63.8%. Over five years, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) compounded fastest (Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) +8.2%/yr, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has the highest dividend yield: Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) 3.56%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 5.93%. Lightstone Value Plus REIT IV (LTSV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) has been the steadiest (Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) 23.7%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 30.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LTSV, RHP and PK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.