LFUS vs LPL vs BELFA Stock Comparison

Littelfuse, LG Display and Bel Fuse Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LITE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$364.03 -15.2% 1M +35.2% 1Y
Market cap
$9.39B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
3 wins
LPL LG Display Co., Ltd.
$2.68 -10.1% 1M -45.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.73B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.53B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
BELFA Bel Fuse Inc /Nj
$166.51 -18.0% 1M +20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.38B
P/E
44.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$744.09M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Bel Fuse leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bel Fuse 6, Littelfuse 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFUSLPLBELFALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.39B $2.73B $2.38B LFUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,165x -5.9x 44.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.5x — 16.0x BELFA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.4% -6.9% +25.3% BELFA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% -2.7% 7.2% BELFA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 3.3% 12.7% BELFA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +35.2% -45.9% +20.0% LFUS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.5%/yr -19.3%/yr +66.0%/yr BELFA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.1% 61.7% 59.2% LFUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 53/100 63/100 BELFA

Percentile Scorecard

LFUSLPLBELFA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFUSLPLBELFA
Valuation 58 #47 of 111 94 #8 of 111 75 #29 of 111
Growth 28 #78 of 108 73 #30 of 108 59 #45 of 108
Profitability 50 #53 of 104 36 #67 of 104 73 #29 of 104
Financial Health 61 #45 of 115 8 #106 of 115 81 #23 of 115
Shareholder Returns 35 #53 of 81 – 29 #58 of 81
Overall 46 53 63
  • LFUS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • BELFA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFUSLPLBELFASPY
1 month -15.2%-10.1%-18.0% -0.8%
3 months -9.7%-14.4%-26.2% +3.5%
6 months -9.7%-35.9%-27.5% +7.0%
Year to date +43.9%-36.3%+9.7% +12.2%
1 year +35.2%-45.9%+20.0% +13.0%
3 years +68.3%-39.4%+244.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +19.0%-15.4%+51.1% +23.1%
5 years +30.6%-65.7%+1,156.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +5.5%-19.3%+66.0% +11.0%
10 years +165.7%-79.4%+811.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.3%-14.6%+24.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLFUSLPLBELFASPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.1%61.7%59.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.9%68.1%67.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.842.332.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.82-0.740.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-76.0%-44.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.6%-53.5%-42.8% -1.8%
52-week high $489.10$5.76$291.23 $779.14
52-week low $234.94$2.59$114.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFUSLPLBELFA
P/E now vs peer median -1,143xmedian 32.0x -5.8xmedian 32.0x 42.2xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.8x 0.2xmedian 2.8x 2.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 39.6xmedian 19.4x —median 19.4x 11.9xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.8xmedian 29.0x 2.0xmedian 29.0x 28.0xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.9x 0.5xmedian 2.9x 2.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 43.13median 1.13 -0.12median 1.13 -3.04median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFUSLPLBELFA
Revenue $2.61B $17.53B $744.09M
Gross profit $1.03B $2.54B $294.08M
Operating income $95.49M $456.43M $118.20M
Net income -$8.06M -$915.07M $77.96M
Free cash flow $444.35M $1.37B $73.34M
R&D $115.22M $957.27M $33.09M
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 $-0.58 $3.94
Cash & equivalents $628.22M $941.29M $306.11M
Total debt $629.66M $37.49B –
Shares (diluted) 25.62M 797.61M 13.61M
Enterprise value $6.90B -$1.74B $1.90B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
P/E -1,143x -5.8x 42.2x
P/FCF 20.8x 2.0x 28.0x
P/Operating cash flow 18.1x 1.3x 24.6x
P/S 3.5x 0.2x 2.8x
P/B 3.5x 0.5x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 0.7x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 39.6x – 11.9x
EV/EBIT 96.8x 22.7x 14.8x
EV/Revenue 3.5x 0.6x 2.3x
EV/FCF 20.8x 7.6x 23.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.1x 4.8x 20.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 43.13 -0.12 -3.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.4% -6.9% 25.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 0.0% 2.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.4% 18.3% 30.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 101.7% 11.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -52.6% 865.5% 50.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.7% 29.4% 10.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -107.5% -141.3% 30.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.5% 36.4% 2.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -107.3% 40.6% -2.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.5% 49.0% -13.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% 28.4% 29.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.0% -6.4% 6.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.0% 585.0% 52.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 33.6% 8.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Gross margin 39.3% 14.5% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 8.9% – 19.8%
Operating margin 3.7% 2.6% 15.9%
Pretax margin 3.0% -5.1% 12.5%
Net margin -0.3% -2.7% 7.2%
FCF margin 17.0% 7.8% 9.9%
Operating cash flow margin 19.6% 12.2% 11.2%
Return on equity -0.3% -18.1% 11.6%
Return on assets -0.2% -5.1% 7.0%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 3.3% 12.7%
Return on capital employed 2.8% 4.4% 12.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -63.5x -2.3x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Debt / assets 15.7% 48.9% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x – –
Debt / FCF 1.4x 6.4x –
Liabilities / assets 34.7% 72.2% 28.1%
Equity / assets 65.3% 27.8% 71.9%
Interest coverage 3.2x 0.6x 10.8x
Current ratio 2.8x 0.6x 4.5x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.3x 3.0x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.1x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 5.64 0.97 5.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Dividend yield 0.8% – 0.1%
Net buyback yield -1.1% – –
Shareholder yield -0.2% 0.0% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFUSLPLBELFA
Forward P/E 20.5xFY2026 – 16.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.78FY2026 $-0.34FY2026 $10.39FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +66.5%FY2026 -312.5%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% – +3.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.11BFY2026 $18.55BFY2026 $771.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.3%FY2026 +3.5%FY2026 +14.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% -3.8% +9.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFUSLPLBELFA
Held by institutions 99.4% 7.8% 63.1%
Institutions holding 606 189 110
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +76.8% +14.8%
Institutions buying 295 153 70
Institutions selling 209 22 30
Buyers to sellers 1.41 6.95 2.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFUSLPLBELFA
LFUS 1.00 0.39 0.62
LPL 0.39 1.00 0.31
BELFA 0.62 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFUS, LPL and BELFA?

Littelfuse (LFUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Littelfuse (LFUS) $9.39B, LG Display (LPL) $2.73B, Bel Fuse (BELFA) $2.38B.

Which company is growing faster?

Bel Fuse (BELFA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Littelfuse (LFUS) +15.4%, LG Display (LPL) -6.9%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) +25.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bel Fuse (BELFA) has the highest net margin (Littelfuse (LFUS) -0.3%, LG Display (LPL) -2.7%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) 7.2%). On return on invested capital, Bel Fuse (BELFA) leads (Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.0%, LG Display (LPL) 3.3%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Littelfuse (LFUS) returned the most: Littelfuse (LFUS) +35.2%, LG Display (LPL) -45.9%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) +20.0%. Over five years, Bel Fuse (BELFA) compounded fastest (Littelfuse (LFUS) +5.5%/yr, LG Display (LPL) -19.3%/yr, Bel Fuse (BELFA) +66.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Littelfuse (LFUS) has been the steadiest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 43.1%, LG Display (LPL) 61.7%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) 59.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LFUS, LPL and BELFA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bel Fuse (BELFA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.