LFUS vs LPL vs BELFA Stock Comparison

Littelfuse, LG Display and Bel Fuse Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HSAI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$404.08 -5.8% 1M +60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.98B
P/E
264.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.76B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
4 wins
LPL LG Display Co., Ltd.
$2.71 -8.8% 1M -46.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.59B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.53B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
1 win
BELFA Bel Fuse Inc /Nj
$187.21 -5.6% 1M +37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.56B
P/E
44.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$785.62M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Bel Fuse leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bel Fuse 5, Littelfuse 4, LG Display 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFUSLPLBELFALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.98B $2.59B $2.56B LFUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 264.0x -5.6x 44.4x BELFA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.7x — 18.0x BELFA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.7% -6.9% +21.0% BELFA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.4% -2.7% — LFUS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.3% 3.3% — LPL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +60.1% -46.9% +37.7% LFUS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.5%/yr -20.2%/yr +66.1%/yr BELFA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.1% 61.7% 59.4% LFUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 53/100 59/100 BELFA

Percentile Scorecard

LFUSLPLBELFA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFUSLPLBELFA
Valuation 60 #45 of 112 94 #8 of 112 67 #38 of 112
Growth 31 #75 of 108 74 #29 of 108 55 #49 of 108
Profitability 63 #39 of 104 37 #66 of 104 58 #44 of 104
Financial Health 66 #40 of 116 9 #106 of 116 84 #20 of 116
Shareholder Returns 42 #46 of 78 – 30 #55 of 78
Overall 52 53 59
  • LFUS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LPL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • BELFA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFUSLPLBELFASPY
1 month -5.8%-8.8%-5.6% +0.7%
3 months -8.6%-9.4%-10.7% +3.7%
6 months 0.0%-36.7%-23.1% +7.1%
Year to date +59.8%-35.6%+23.3% +12.8%
1 year +60.1%-46.9%+37.7% +11.9%
3 years +87.6%-40.3%+274.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +23.3%-15.8%+55.3% +22.8%
5 years +37.2%-67.5%+1,160.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +6.5%-20.2%+66.1% +10.9%
10 years +192.0%-77.9%+924.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +11.3%-14.0%+26.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLFUSLPLBELFASPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.1%61.7%59.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.6%68.0%67.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.852.342.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.39-0.760.63 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-76.0%-44.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.4%-53.0%-35.7% -1.2%
52-week high $489.10$5.76$291.23 $779.14
52-week low $234.94$2.59$114.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFUSLPLBELFA
P/E now vs peer median 271.6xmedian 32.9x -5.8xmedian 32.9x 44.1xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 2.9x 0.2xmedian 2.9x 2.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 34.7xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x —median 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 30.2x 2.0xmedian 30.2x 33.3xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 2.9x 0.5xmedian 2.9x 2.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -5.35median 1.08 -0.12median 1.08 -3.42median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFUSLPLBELFA
Revenue $2.76B $17.53B $785.62M
Gross profit $1.10B $2.54B $313.22M
Operating income $151.43M $456.43M $127.41M
Net income $37.79M -$915.07M $93.79M
Free cash flow $528.88M $1.37B –
R&D $117.61M $957.27M $34.33M
EPS (diluted) $1.47 $-0.58 $4.24
Cash & equivalents $824.84M $941.29M $333.12M
Total debt $629.93M $37.49B –
Shares (diluted) 25.67M 797.61M 13.61M
Enterprise value $7.48B -$1.89B $2.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
P/E 271.6x -5.8x 44.1x
P/FCF 19.4x 2.0x 33.3x
P/Operating cash flow 17.2x 1.3x 24.2x
P/S 3.7x 0.2x 2.9x
P/B 3.8x 0.5x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 4.7x 0.7x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 34.7x – –
EV/EBIT 66.5x 22.8x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x 0.6x 2.9x
EV/FCF 19.0x 7.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.9x 4.9x 24.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.35 -0.12 -3.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.7% -6.9% 21.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.5% 0.0% 5.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.9% 18.3% 24.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 101.7% 13.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -28.2% 865.5% 30.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -28.7% 29.4% 12.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -68.1% -141.3% 26.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -50.4% 36.4% 7.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.9% 40.6% -17.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.8% 49.0% -12.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.6% 28.4% 60.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.4% -6.4% -0.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 38.7% 585.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.1% 33.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Gross margin 40.1% 14.5% –
EBITDA margin 10.5% – –
Operating margin 5.5% 2.6% –
Pretax margin 4.9% -5.1% –
Net margin 1.4% -2.7% –
FCF margin 19.2% 7.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 21.6% 12.2% 12.2%
Return on equity 1.4% -18.1% 10.2%
Return on assets 0.9% -5.1% 7.3%
Return on invested capital 1.3% 3.3% –
Return on capital employed 4.4% 4.4% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 15.8x -2.3x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Debt / assets 14.9% 48.9% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x – –
Debt / FCF 1.2x 6.4x –
Liabilities / assets 35.5% 72.2% 20.0%
Equity / assets 64.5% 27.8% 71.3%
Interest coverage 5.7x 0.6x –
Current ratio 2.7x 0.6x 4.4x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.3x –
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 5.82 0.97 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFUSLPLBELFA
Dividend yield 0.8% – 0.1%
Net buyback yield -0.8% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFUSLPLBELFA
Forward P/E 22.7xFY2026 – 18.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.78FY2026 $-0.16FY2026 $10.39FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +66.5%FY2026 -200.0%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% – +3.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.11BFY2026 $19.01BFY2026 $771.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.3%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026 +14.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% -4.5% +9.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFUSLPLBELFA
Held by institutions 99.4% 7.8% 63.1%
Institutions holding 607 189 110
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +76.8% +14.8%
Institutions buying 295 153 70
Institutions selling 210 22 30
Buyers to sellers 1.40 6.95 2.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFUSLPLBELFA
LFUS 1.00 0.39 0.63
LPL 0.39 1.00 0.30
BELFA 0.63 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFUS, LPL and BELFA?

Littelfuse (LFUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Littelfuse (LFUS) $9.98B, LG Display (LPL) $2.59B, Bel Fuse (BELFA) $2.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, LFUS, LPL and BELFA?

Bel Fuse (BELFA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Littelfuse (LFUS) 264.0x, LG Display (LPL) -5.6x, Bel Fuse (BELFA) 44.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bel Fuse (BELFA) is cheapest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 22.7x, Bel Fuse (BELFA) 18.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bel Fuse (BELFA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Littelfuse (LFUS) +18.7%, LG Display (LPL) -6.9%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) +21.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Littelfuse (LFUS) has the highest net margin (Littelfuse (LFUS) 1.4%, LG Display (LPL) -2.7%). On return on invested capital, LG Display (LPL) leads (Littelfuse (LFUS) 1.3%, LG Display (LPL) 3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Littelfuse (LFUS) returned the most: Littelfuse (LFUS) +60.1%, LG Display (LPL) -46.9%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) +37.7%. Over five years, Bel Fuse (BELFA) compounded fastest (Littelfuse (LFUS) +6.5%/yr, LG Display (LPL) -20.2%/yr, Bel Fuse (BELFA) +66.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Littelfuse (LFUS) has been the steadiest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 43.1%, LG Display (LPL) 61.7%, Bel Fuse (BELFA) 59.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LFUS, LPL and BELFA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bel Fuse (BELFA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.