KRNT vs NOW vs TRI Stock Comparison

Kornit Digital, ServiceNow and Thomson Reuters Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MMM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KRNT Kornit Digital Ltd.
$18.15 +13.4% 1M +24.8% 1Y
Market cap
$840.18M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$215.85M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins
NOW ServiceNow, Inc.
$149.85 +14.0% 1M -20.1% 1Y
Market cap
$155.54B
P/E
107.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.43B
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
4 wins
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
$116.09 +19.3% 1M -28.3% 1Y
Market cap
$51.66B
P/E
32.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.83B
Div. yield
3.47%
Compliance Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

ServiceNow leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (ServiceNow 4, Thomson Reuters 4, Kornit Digital 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKRNTNOWTRILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $840.18M $155.54B $51.66B NOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -40.4x 107.3x 32.1x TRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 90.7x 38.9x 26.0x TRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.0% +21.8% +7.0% NOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -9.4% 9.4% 20.7% TRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.8x 1.2x NOW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 3.47% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.8% -20.1% -28.3% KRNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -35.9%/yr +1.4%/yr -1.5%/yr NOW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.5% 58.8% 51.8% KRNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 51/100 56/100 TRI

Percentile Scorecard

KRNTNOWTRI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKRNTNOWTRI
Valuation 48 #107 of 203 33 #68 of 101 51 #50 of 101
Growth 40 #113 of 188 50 #49 of 97 25 #73 of 97
Profitability 22 #143 of 184 80 #20 of 94 99 #2 of 94
Financial Health 99 #3 of 217 53 #51 of 108 66 #37 of 108
Shareholder Returns 11 #137 of 153 38 #40 of 64 40 #39 of 64
Overall 44 51 56
  • KRNT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • NOW ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • TRI ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKRNTNOWTRISPY
1 month +13.4%+14.0%+19.3% +0.9%
3 months +24.1%+29.4%+9.2% +5.9%
6 months +19.2%+68.6%+24.4% +8.5%
Year to date +26.2%-2.2%-12.0% +13.3%
1 year +24.8%-20.1%-28.3% +12.4%
3 years +32.5%+35.2%-1.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +9.8%+10.6%-0.5% +23.5%
5 years -89.1%+7.4%-7.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year -35.9%+1.4%-1.5% +11.0%
10 years +72.0%+770.2%+183.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +5.6%+24.2%+11.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureKRNTNOWTRISPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.5%58.8%51.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.0%61.5%52.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.520.600.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.57-0.34-0.55 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.0%-64.5%-64.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.9%-20.1%-28.3% -0.9%
52-week high $18.31$187.58$161.88 $779.14
52-week low $12.31$83.00$76.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKRNTNOWTRI
P/E now vs peer median -40.4xmedian 25.4x 107.3xmedian 27.6x 32.1xmedian 27.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 1.9x 10.1xmedian 2.7x 6.6xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -17.0xmedian 14.3x 46.0xmedian 17.4x 25.7xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 21.8x 32.7xmedian 15.8x 16.2xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.2x 11.9xmedian 3.2x 4.6xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.10median 1.41 -31.41median 0.84 3.10median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKRNTNOWTRI
Revenue $215.85M $15.43B $7.83B
Gross profit $97.83M $11.28B –
Operating income -$40.02M $1.49B $2.33B
Net income -$20.32M $1.45B $1.68B
Free cash flow $26.70M $4.75B $3.19B
R&D $20.41M $3.47B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $1.39 $3.61
Cash & equivalents $33.81M $2.39B $577.00M
Total debt – $7.52B $3.26B
Shares (diluted) 45.24M 1.04B 449.53M
Enterprise value -$702.66M $134.81B $48.44B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKRNTNOWTRI
P/E -40.4x 107.3x 32.1x
P/FCF 31.5x 32.7x 16.2x
P/Operating cash flow 28.2x 29.2x 17.9x
P/S 3.9x 10.1x 6.6x
P/B 1.3x 11.9x 4.6x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 16.4x 6.4x
EV/EBITDA -17.0x 46.0x 25.7x
EV/EBIT -11.7x 106.1x 23.3x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 10.3x 6.9x
EV/FCF 17.5x 33.4x 17.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.7x 29.7x 18.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.10 -31.41 3.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKRNTNOWTRI
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.0% 21.8% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.7% 22.1% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.6% 14.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.5% 19.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -28.0% -14.9% 9.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.6% 32.1% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -80.4% -16.5% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.6% -3.1% -6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -89.3% -16.2% 8.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 36.6% -3.4% 10.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -40.1% 10.2% 14.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.9% 21.8% 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -41.6% 20.0% 13.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.6% 25.9% 9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKRNTNOWTRI
Gross margin 45.3% 73.1% –
EBITDA margin -12.7% 22.3% 26.9%
Operating margin -18.5% 9.7% 29.7%
Pretax margin -9.0% 13.1% 46.5%
Net margin -9.4% 9.4% 20.7%
FCF margin 12.4% 30.8% 40.7%
Operating cash flow margin 13.8% 34.6% 36.9%
Return on equity -3.0% 11.3% –
Return on assets -2.7% 4.6% –
Return on invested capital – 5.2% –
Return on capital employed -5.9% 7.5% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 3.7x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 10.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKRNTNOWTRI
Debt / assets – 23.6% 18.0%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.8x 1.2x
Debt / FCF – 1.6x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 11.4% 58.9% 38.5%
Equity / assets 88.6% 41.1% 61.5%
Interest coverage – 14.6x 116.5x
Current ratio 8.8x 0.7x 0.5x
Quick ratio 6.6x 0.6x -2.5x
Cash ratio 5.7x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 5.77 5.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKRNTNOWTRI
Dividend yield – – 3.5%
Net buyback yield -4.6% 1.7% -2.2%
Shareholder yield -4.6% 1.7% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 30.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 16.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -10.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -8.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKRNTNOWTRI
Forward P/E 90.7xFY2026 38.9xFY2026 26.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.20FY2026 $3.85FY2026 $4.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -35.5%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +50.0% +27.0% +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $229.31MFY2026 $15.25BFY2026 $7.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.1%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +17.7% +15.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKRNTNOWTRI
Held by institutions 90.9% 81.6% 90.1%
Institutions holding 118 2,224 421
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.9% -2.1% +0.6%
Institutions buying 65 1,285 408
Institutions selling 35 779 9
Buyers to sellers 1.86 1.65 45.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KRNTNOWTRI
KRNT 1.00 -0.03 -0.04
NOW -0.03 1.00 0.59
TRI -0.04 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KRNT, NOW and TRI?

ServiceNow (NOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kornit Digital (KRNT) $840.18M, ServiceNow (NOW) $155.54B, Thomson Reuters (TRI) $51.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, KRNT, NOW and TRI?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kornit Digital (KRNT) -40.4x, ServiceNow (NOW) 107.3x, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 32.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thomson Reuters (TRI) is cheapest (Kornit Digital (KRNT) 90.7x, ServiceNow (NOW) 38.9x, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ServiceNow (NOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kornit Digital (KRNT) +4.0%, ServiceNow (NOW) +21.8%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thomson Reuters (TRI) has the highest net margin (Kornit Digital (KRNT) -9.4%, ServiceNow (NOW) 9.4%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 20.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kornit Digital (KRNT) returned the most: Kornit Digital (KRNT) +24.8%, ServiceNow (NOW) -20.1%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) -28.3%. Over five years, ServiceNow (NOW) compounded fastest (Kornit Digital (KRNT) -35.9%/yr, ServiceNow (NOW) +1.4%/yr, Thomson Reuters (TRI) -1.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Thomson Reuters (TRI) 3.47%. Kornit Digital (KRNT) and ServiceNow (NOW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kornit Digital (KRNT) has been the steadiest (Kornit Digital (KRNT) 43.5%, ServiceNow (NOW) 58.8%, Thomson Reuters (TRI) 51.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KRNT, NOW and TRI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ServiceNow (NOW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.