HUBB vs AUSI vs APWC Stock Comparison

Hubbell, Aura Systems and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (VRT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$437.90 -4.7% 1M -7.3% 1Y
Market cap
$22.20B
P/E
24.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.59B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
6 wins
AUSI Aura Systems Inc
$0.20 0.0% 1M +5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$29.49M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$127.00K
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Hubbell leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Hubbell 6, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable 2, Aura Systems 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUBBAUSIAPWCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.20B $29.49M $23.71M HUBB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.4x -6.3x 3.5x APWC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.0% -31.4% +9.0% HUBB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% -3,697.6% 1.3% HUBB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.3% — 4.1% HUBB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.3% +5.3% -35.8% AUSI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.1%/yr -17.1%/yr -17.9%/yr HUBB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.0% 226.5% 59.2% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 14/100 59/100 APWC

Percentile Scorecard

HUBBAUSIAPWC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUBBAUSIAPWC
Valuation 38 #126 of 203 1 #202 of 203 72 #58 of 203
Growth 71 #56 of 188 44 #105 of 188 63 #71 of 188
Profitability 85 #28 of 183 10 #165 of 183 24 #140 of 183
Financial Health 16 #181 of 216 1 #215 of 216 78 #49 of 216
Shareholder Returns 72 #44 of 152 – –
Overall 56 14 59
  • HUBB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • AUSI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • APWC ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUBBAUSIAPWCSPY
1 month -4.7%0.0%-11.9% +0.7%
3 months -7.5%+17.6%-20.3% +3.7%
6 months -13.8%+53.8%-22.9% +7.1%
Year to date -1.4%+185.7%-36.7% +12.8%
1 year -7.3%+5.3%-35.8% +11.9%
3 years +54.6%+11.1%-8.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +15.6%+3.6%-2.9% +22.8%
5 years +119.6%-60.8%-62.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +17.1%-17.1%-17.9% +10.9%
10 years +318.6%—-46.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +15.4%—-6.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHUBBAUSIAPWCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.0%226.5%59.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.3%349.7%48.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.19-0.040.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.230.02-0.61 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.1%-90.9%-65.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.5%-9.1%-43.5% -1.2%
52-week high $557.85$0.22$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $407.36$0.07$1.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUBBAUSIAPWC
P/E now vs peer median 25.5xmedian 25.8x -6.3xmedian 25.8x 3.6xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.9x 233.0xmedian 1.9x 0.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 14.6x —median 14.6x —median 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.9xmedian 22.2x -9.1xmedian 22.2x -3.6xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 2.2x -0.6xmedian 2.2x 0.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.53median 1.45 -0.60median 1.45 —median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUBBAUSIAPWC
Revenue $6.59B $127.00K $529.68M
Gross profit $2.33B $116.00K $43.84M
Operating income $1.33B -$3.73M $13.32M
Net income $915.00M -$4.70M $11.40M
Free cash flow $928.00M – -$6.69M
R&D – $1.60M –
EPS (diluted) $17.12 $-0.03 $0.33
Cash & equivalents $334.50M $13.00K $64.58M
Total debt $5.12B $57.21M $194.37M
Shares (diluted) 53.10M 147.97M 20.62M
Enterprise value $20.43B $29.33M -$196.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUBBAUSIAPWC
P/E 25.5x -6.3x 3.6x
P/FCF 24.9x -9.1x -3.6x
P/Operating cash flow 20.9x – -3.6x
P/S 3.5x 233.0x 0.0x
P/B 5.6x -0.6x 0.1x
P/Tangible book 23.7x -0.6x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x – –
EV/EBIT 20.9x -11.8x 1.1x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 347.1x 0.0x
EV/FCF 30.1x – -2.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 25.2x – -2.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.53 -0.60 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUBBAUSIAPWC
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.0% -31.4% 9.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 25.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.1% -27.5% 29.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 48.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 15.2% -14.7% 56.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.6% -6.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 5.6% 33.8% 101.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.4% -2.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 6.1% 44.8% 119.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 10.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% – -138.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.5% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 9.1% – -138.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUBBAUSIAPWC
Gross margin 35.4% 91.3% 8.3%
EBITDA margin 24.5% – –
Operating margin 20.2% -2,934% 2.5%
Pretax margin 17.7% -4,554% 2.8%
Net margin 13.8% -3,698% 1.3%
FCF margin 14.1% – -1.3%
Operating cash flow margin 16.8% – -1.3%
Return on equity 22.8% – 4.2%
Return on assets 7.7% -402.7% 2.6%
Return on invested capital 11.3% – 4.1%
Return on capital employed 13.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.1x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x – -0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUBBAUSIAPWC
Debt / assets 43.0% 961.3% 13.3%
Debt / equity 1.2x -0.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x – –
Debt / FCF 5.5x – -8.7x
Liabilities / assets 65.4% 3,433% 38.6%
Equity / assets 34.6% -3,333% 61.4%
Interest coverage – -1.8x 7.7x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.0x –
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – -526.78 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUBBAUSIAPWC
Dividend yield 1.3% – –
Net buyback yield 0.9% – –
Shareholder yield 2.2% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUBBAUSIAPWC
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $20.07FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +21.9% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.32BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +25.4%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +9.8% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUBBAUSIAPWC
Held by institutions 96.1% – –
Institutions holding 1,016 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% – –
Institutions buying 511 – –
Institutions selling 319 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.60 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUBBAUSIAPWC
HUBB 1.00 0.10 0.17
AUSI 0.10 1.00 -0.10
APWC 0.17 -0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUBB, AUSI and APWC?

Hubbell (HUBB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hubbell (HUBB) $22.20B, Aura Systems (AUSI) $29.49M, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) $23.71M.

Which stock is cheaper, HUBB, AUSI and APWC?

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hubbell (HUBB) 24.4x, Aura Systems (AUSI) -6.3x, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 3.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hubbell (HUBB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hubbell (HUBB) +16.0%, Aura Systems (AUSI) -31.4%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) +9.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hubbell (HUBB) has the highest net margin (Hubbell (HUBB) 13.8%, Aura Systems (AUSI) -3,697.6%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Hubbell (HUBB) leads (Hubbell (HUBB) 11.3%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 4.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aura Systems (AUSI) returned the most: Hubbell (HUBB) -7.3%, Aura Systems (AUSI) +5.3%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) -35.8%. Over five years, Hubbell (HUBB) compounded fastest (Hubbell (HUBB) +17.1%/yr, Aura Systems (AUSI) -17.1%/yr, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) -17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (Hubbell (HUBB) 32.0%, Aura Systems (AUSI) 226.5%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 59.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUBB, AUSI and APWC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hubbell (HUBB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.