GTX vs DOV vs MMM Stock Comparison

Garrett Motion, Dover and 3M Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MTD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.
$20.22 -25.3% 1M +19.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.78B
P/E
10.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.78B
Div. yield
1.58%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins
DOV DOVER Corp
$215.90 +13.8% 1M +19.0% 1Y
Market cap
$29.08B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.42B
Div. yield
0.97%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins
MMM 3M Co
$178.37 +10.2% 1M +7.1% 1Y
Market cap
$92.17B
P/E
26.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
1.72%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Garrett Motion leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Garrett Motion 6, 3M 3, Dover 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTXDOVMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.78B $29.08B $92.17B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.0x 25.6x 26.2x GTX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.1x 21.1x 20.1x GTX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.9% +7.6% +1.7% DOV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% 13.5% 14.0% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 62.4% 10.4% 22.0% GTX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x 0.8x 1.6x DOV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.58% 0.97% 1.72% MMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.4% +19.0% +7.1% GTX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.2%/yr +4.9%/yr +3.2%/yr GTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.0% 25.3% 25.7% DOV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 55/100 49/100 GTX

Percentile Scorecard

GTXDOVMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTXDOVMMM
Valuation 99 #4 of 203 44 #114 of 203 35 #132 of 203
Growth 47 #101 of 189 44 #106 of 189 62 #73 of 189
Profitability 76 #45 of 187 77 #44 of 187 87 #25 of 187
Financial Health 16 #187 of 221 70 #67 of 221 19 #180 of 221
Shareholder Returns 94 #10 of 152 39 #93 of 152 40 #91 of 152
Overall 66 55 49
  • GTX ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • DOV ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTXDOVMMMSPY
1 month -25.3%+13.8%+10.2% -2.3%
3 months -33.9%+4.9%+0.6% -0.7%
6 months -19.1%-2.2%+26.0% +4.8%
Year to date +16.0%+10.6%+11.4% +10.3%
1 year +19.4%+19.0%+7.1% +10.3%
3 years +171.0%+60.7%+127.3% +73.0%
3 years, per year +39.5%+17.1%+31.5% +20.1%
5 years +183.6%+27.0%+17.1% +61.9%
5 years, per year +23.2%+4.9%+3.2% +10.1%
10 years —+303.2%+28.7% +258.6%
10 years, per year —+15.0%+2.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGTXDOVMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.0%25.3%25.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.0%25.3%24.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.720.920.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.430.750.28 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.2%-36.3%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.2%-7.5%-3.0% -3.5%
52-week high $36.23$233.31$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $15.64$178.03$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTXDOVMMM
P/E now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 25.6x 25.6xmedian 25.6x 26.2xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.9x 3.5xmedian 1.9x 3.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 14.4x 16.9xmedian 14.4x 16.6xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 22.5x 24.7xmedian 22.5x 34.4xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median -6.1xmedian 2.2x 3.8xmedian 2.2x 22.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.06median 1.36 5.27median 1.36 0.73median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTXDOVMMM
Revenue $3.78B $8.42B $25.25B
Gross profit $799.00M $3.33B $9.98B
Operating income $555.00M $1.42B $4.74B
Net income $377.00M $1.13B $3.58B
Free cash flow $395.00M $1.18B $2.68B
R&D – – $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $1.98 $8.37 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $211.00M $1.76B $4.84B
Total debt $1.37B $3.26B $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 190.59M 135.55M 522.60M
Enterprise value $3.09B $22.45B $74.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTXDOVMMM
P/E 10.0x 25.6x 26.2x
P/FCF 9.6x 24.7x 34.4x
P/Operating cash flow 7.9x 20.8x 25.4x
P/S 1.0x 3.5x 3.7x
P/B -6.1x 3.8x 22.1x
P/Tangible book -6.1x 4.8x 43.5x
EV/EBITDA 7.5x 16.9x 16.6x
EV/EBIT 8.9x 21.5x 21.5x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 3.6x 4.0x
EV/FCF 12.5x 26.0x 38.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.3x 21.9x 28.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.06 5.27 0.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTXDOVMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.9% 7.6% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 2.5% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 8.5% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 4.9% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.0% 11.0% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.7% 4.0% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 15.6% -50.5% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 3.6% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.7% -49.6% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 162.6% 4.9% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.2% 20.1% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 12.5% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% 22.4% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.2% 14.6% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTXDOVMMM
Gross margin 21.1% 39.6% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 17.5% 21.5% 24.4%
Operating margin 14.7% 16.9% 18.8%
Pretax margin 12.3% 16.8% 17.5%
Net margin 10.0% 13.5% 14.0%
FCF margin 10.4% 14.0% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% 16.6% 14.4%
Return on equity – 14.9% 101.3%
Return on assets 15.1% 8.3% 9.8%
Return on invested capital 62.4% 10.4% 22.0%
Return on capital employed 53.8% 12.8% 18.7%
Asset turnover 1.5x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.2x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.5% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTXDOVMMM
Debt / assets 53.9% 23.8% 37.9%
Debt / equity -2.2x 0.4x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x 0.8x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 3.5x 2.8x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 124.4% 43.7% 89.5%
Equity / assets -24.4% 56.3% 10.5%
Interest coverage 5.4x 12.5x –
Current ratio 1.0x 2.0x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.3x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.33 5.58 4.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTXDOVMMM
Dividend yield 1.6% 1.0% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 6.5% 1.9% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 8.0% 2.9% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 24.8% 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 23.9% 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.7% 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -0.4% -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTXDOVMMM
Forward P/E 11.1xFY2026 21.1xFY2026 20.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.82FY2026 $10.22FY2026 $8.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.0%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +11.4% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.58BFY2026 $8.16BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +0.8%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% +17.8% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTXDOVMMM
Held by institutions 96.8% 91.1% 74.5%
Institutions holding 459 1,165 2,212
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% -0.3% +0.8%
Institutions buying 239 501 916
Institutions selling 140 406 839
Buyers to sellers 1.71 1.23 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTXDOVMMM
GTX 1.00 0.40 0.31
DOV 0.40 1.00 0.47
MMM 0.31 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTX, DOV and MMM?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Garrett Motion (GTX) $3.78B, Dover (DOV) $29.08B, 3M (MMM) $92.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, GTX, DOV and MMM?

Garrett Motion (GTX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Garrett Motion (GTX) 10.0x, Dover (DOV) 25.6x, 3M (MMM) 26.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Garrett Motion (GTX) is cheapest (Garrett Motion (GTX) 11.1x, Dover (DOV) 21.1x, 3M (MMM) 20.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Dover (DOV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Garrett Motion (GTX) +6.9%, Dover (DOV) +7.6%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Garrett Motion (GTX) 10.0%, Dover (DOV) 13.5%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads (Garrett Motion (GTX) 62.4%, Dover (DOV) 10.4%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Garrett Motion (GTX) returned the most: Garrett Motion (GTX) +19.4%, Dover (DOV) +19.0%, 3M (MMM) +7.1%. Over five years, Garrett Motion (GTX) compounded fastest (Garrett Motion (GTX) +23.2%/yr, Dover (DOV) +4.9%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

3M (MMM) has the highest dividend yield: Garrett Motion (GTX) 1.58%, Dover (DOV) 0.97%, 3M (MMM) 1.72%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dover (DOV) has been the steadiest (Garrett Motion (GTX) 45.0%, Dover (DOV) 25.3%, 3M (MMM) 25.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTX, DOV and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.