GTLB vs U vs FIS Stock Comparison

Gitlab, Unity Software and Fidelity National Information Services Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FROG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$56.65 +21.3% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.83B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
3 wins
U Unity Software Inc.
$39.24 -1.2% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.03B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fidelity National Information Services leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fidelity National Information Services 7, Gitlab 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTLBUFISLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.83B $17.16B $20.66B FIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -167.7x -29.2x 6.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 62.9x — 5.9x FIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.0% +14.0% +18.3% GTLB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -5.0% -29.0% 27.6% FIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -17.2% 3.9% FIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 13.2x 4.9x FIS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.9% +5.7% -39.4% GTLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.8%/yr -23.7%/yr -19.6%/yr GTLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.7% 74.7% 34.2% FIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 47/100 69/100 FIS

Percentile Scorecard

GTLBUFIS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTLBUFIS
Valuation 51 #61 of 124 59 #51 of 124 97 #4 of 101
Growth 83 #20 of 113 41 #67 of 113 84 #16 of 97
Profitability 63 #41 of 109 49 #56 of 109 66 #32 of 93
Financial Health 68 #41 of 127 52 #62 of 127 21 #86 of 108
Shareholder Returns 71 #19 of 63 36 #41 of 63 74 #17 of 63
Overall 67 47 69
  • GTLB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • U ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FIS ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTLBUFISSPY
1 month +21.3%-1.2%+11.8% +0.7%
3 months +68.0%+17.8%-19.0% +3.7%
6 months +155.9%+48.5%-19.9% +7.1%
Year to date +50.9%-11.2%-43.9% +12.8%
1 year +17.9%+5.7%-39.4% +11.9%
3 years +35.3%+56.5%-23.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +10.6%+16.1%-8.3% +22.8%
5 years -49.5%-74.1%-66.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year -12.8%-23.7%-19.6% +10.9%
10 years ——-49.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-6.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGTLBUFISSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.7%74.7%34.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.2%81.2%36.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.932.180.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.300.08-1.15 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.2%-93.1%-73.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.3%-20.7%-44.8% -1.2%
52-week high $57.97$49.47$67.54 $779.14
52-week low $19.42$17.13$32.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTLBUFIS
P/E now vs peer median -181.4xmedian 39.0x -29.2xmedian 39.0x 5.7xmedian 28.0x
P/S now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 4.6x 8.5xmedian 4.6x 1.6xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -308.8xmedian 32.7x -114.2xmedian 32.7x 9.5xmedian 16.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 44.1xmedian 27.4x 32.1xmedian 27.4x 6.8xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 3.2x 5.7xmedian 3.2x 1.2xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -4.92median 1.23 -1.49median 1.23 0.19median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTLBUFIS
Revenue $1.06B $2.03B $12.20B
Gross profit $904.84M $1.32B $4.39B
Operating income -$90.20M -$616.00M $1.92B
Net income -$54.73M -$588.01M $3.38B
Free cash flow $213.67M $538.39M $2.82B
R&D $304.14M $1.03B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 $-1.34 $6.52
Cash & equivalents $226.49M $2.35B $744.00M
Total debt – $557.17M $21.17B
Shares (diluted) 168.70M 437.90M 517.00M
Enterprise value $3.76B $8.71B $17.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTLBUFIS
P/E -181.4x -29.2x 5.7x
P/FCF 44.1x 32.1x 6.8x
P/Operating cash flow 42.2x 31.2x 6.5x
P/S 8.9x 8.5x 1.6x
P/B 9.7x 5.7x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 9.7x 6.0x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA -308.8x -114.2x 9.5x
EV/EBIT -90.4x -25.1x 20.7x
EV/Revenue 7.7x 7.6x 3.3x
EV/FCF 38.2x 28.7x 14.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.5x 27.9x 13.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.92 -1.49 0.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTLBUFIS
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.0% 14.0% 18.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 28.1% 3.9% 7.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.1% -0.6% 15.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 2.1% 7.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.7% -23.8% 10.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.2% 13.7% 10.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -405.1% -35.5% 2,836%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 34.8% 15.8% 28.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -470.3% -29.1% 2,957%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 36.9% 19.7% 29.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 433.4% 45.5% 31.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 310.4% 110.7% 85.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 496.3% 51.7% 32.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1,057% 83.0% 100.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTLBUFIS
Gross margin 85.8% 64.9% 35.9%
EBITDA margin -2.5% -6.7% 34.3%
Operating margin -8.5% -30.4% 15.7%
Pretax margin -4.7% -29.0% 11.1%
Net margin -5.0% -29.0% 27.6%
FCF margin 20.3% 26.5% 23.1%
Operating cash flow margin 21.2% 27.3% 24.4%
Return on equity -5.4% -19.5% 21.1%
Return on assets -3.2% -8.9% 7.7%
Return on invested capital – -17.2% 3.9%
Return on capital employed -8.8% -12.3% 5.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.1x -0.9x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 21.8% 16.9% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTLBUFIS
Debt / assets – 8.4% 48.0%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 13.2x 4.9x
Debt / FCF – 1.0x 7.5x
Liabilities / assets 41.5% 54.4% 63.6%
Equity / assets 58.5% 45.6% 36.4%
Interest coverage – -25.5x 3.2x
Current ratio 2.4x 2.0x 0.5x
Quick ratio 2.3x 1.9x 0.4x
Cash ratio 1.9x 1.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 8.24 2.20 0.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTLBUFIS
Dividend yield – – 4.6%
Net buyback yield 1.3% -0.6% 3.7%
Shareholder yield 1.3% -0.6% 8.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 25.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 31.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 6.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTLBUFIS
Forward P/E 62.9xFY2026 – 5.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.90FY2026 $-0.70FY2026 $6.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.2%FY2026 – +10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.1% – +6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.08BFY2026 $2.13BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 +21.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.3% +30.9% +4.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTLBUFIS
Held by institutions 95.7% 84.7% 98.7%
Institutions holding 397 559 857
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.9% +8.0% +3.5%
Institutions buying 231 307 415
Institutions selling 122 161 332
Buyers to sellers 1.89 1.91 1.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTLBUFIS
GTLB 1.00 0.33 0.34
U 0.33 1.00 0.26
FIS 0.34 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTLB, U and FIS?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gitlab (GTLB) $8.83B, Unity Software (U) $17.16B, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) $20.66B.

Which company is growing faster?

Gitlab (GTLB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%, Unity Software (U) +14.0%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) +18.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has the highest net margin (Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%, Unity Software (U) -29.0%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 27.6%). On return on invested capital, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads (Unity Software (U) -17.2%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 3.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gitlab (GTLB) returned the most: Gitlab (GTLB) +17.9%, Unity Software (U) +5.7%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -39.4%. Over five years, Gitlab (GTLB) compounded fastest (Gitlab (GTLB) -12.8%/yr, Unity Software (U) -23.7%/yr, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -19.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Gitlab (GTLB) 0.00%, Unity Software (U) 0.00%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 0.04%. Gitlab (GTLB) and Unity Software (U) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has been the steadiest (Gitlab (GTLB) 59.7%, Unity Software (U) 74.7%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 34.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTLB, U and FIS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.