GTLB vs FIS vs U Stock Comparison

Gitlab, Fidelity National Information Services and Unity Software Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FROG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$56.65 +21.3% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.83B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
3 wins
U Unity Software Inc.
$39.24 -1.2% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.03B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fidelity National Information Services leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fidelity National Information Services 7, Gitlab 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTLBFISULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.83B $20.66B $17.16B FIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -167.7x 6.1x -29.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 62.9x 5.9x — FIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.0% +18.3% +14.0% GTLB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -5.0% 27.6% -29.0% FIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.9% -17.2% FIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.9x 13.2x FIS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.9% -39.4% +5.7% GTLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.8%/yr -19.6%/yr -23.7%/yr GTLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.7% 34.2% 74.7% FIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 69/100 47/100 FIS

Percentile Scorecard

GTLBFISU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTLBFISU
Valuation 51 #61 of 124 97 #4 of 101 59 #51 of 124
Growth 83 #20 of 113 84 #16 of 97 41 #67 of 113
Profitability 63 #41 of 109 66 #32 of 93 49 #56 of 109
Financial Health 68 #41 of 127 21 #86 of 108 52 #62 of 127
Shareholder Returns 71 #19 of 63 74 #17 of 63 36 #41 of 63
Overall 67 69 47
  • GTLB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FIS ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • U ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTLBFISUSPY
1 month +21.3%+11.8%-1.2% +0.7%
3 months +68.0%-19.0%+17.8% +3.7%
6 months +155.9%-19.9%+48.5% +7.1%
Year to date +50.9%-43.9%-11.2% +12.8%
1 year +17.9%-39.4%+5.7% +11.9%
3 years +35.3%-23.0%+56.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +10.6%-8.3%+16.1% +22.8%
5 years -49.5%-66.3%-74.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year -12.8%-19.6%-23.7% +10.9%
10 years —-49.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —-6.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGTLBFISUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.7%34.2%74.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.2%36.7%81.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.930.262.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.30-1.150.08 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.2%-73.4%-93.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.3%-44.8%-20.7% -1.2%
52-week high $57.97$67.54$49.47 $779.14
52-week low $19.42$32.43$17.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTLBFISU
P/E now vs peer median -181.4xmedian 39.0x 5.7xmedian 28.0x -29.2xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 4.6x 1.6xmedian 2.8x 8.5xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -308.8xmedian 32.7x 9.5xmedian 16.9x -114.2xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 44.1xmedian 27.4x 6.8xmedian 15.9x 32.1xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 3.2x 1.2xmedian 3.2x 5.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -4.92median 1.23 0.19median 0.89 -1.49median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTLBFISU
Revenue $1.06B $12.20B $2.03B
Gross profit $904.84M $4.39B $1.32B
Operating income -$90.20M $1.92B -$616.00M
Net income -$54.73M $3.38B -$588.01M
Free cash flow $213.67M $2.82B $538.39M
R&D $304.14M – $1.03B
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 $6.52 $-1.34
Cash & equivalents $226.49M $744.00M $2.35B
Total debt – $21.17B $557.17M
Shares (diluted) 168.70M 517.00M 437.90M
Enterprise value $3.76B $17.99B $8.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTLBFISU
P/E -181.4x 5.7x -29.2x
P/FCF 44.1x 6.8x 32.1x
P/Operating cash flow 42.2x 6.5x 31.2x
P/S 8.9x 1.6x 8.5x
P/B 9.7x 1.2x 5.7x
P/Tangible book 9.7x 1.6x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA -308.8x 9.5x -114.2x
EV/EBIT -90.4x 20.7x -25.1x
EV/Revenue 7.7x 3.3x 7.6x
EV/FCF 38.2x 14.1x 28.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.5x 13.3x 27.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.92 0.19 -1.49

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTLBFISU
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.0% 18.3% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 28.1% 7.7% 3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.1% 15.9% -0.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 7.2% 2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.7% 10.2% -23.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.2% 10.6% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -405.1% 2,836% -35.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 34.8% 28.9% 15.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -470.3% 2,957% -29.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 36.9% 29.3% 19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 433.4% 31.6% 45.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 310.4% 85.1% 110.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 496.3% 32.4% 51.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1,057% 100.7% 83.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTLBFISU
Gross margin 85.8% 35.9% 64.9%
EBITDA margin -2.5% 34.3% -6.7%
Operating margin -8.5% 15.7% -30.4%
Pretax margin -4.7% 11.1% -29.0%
Net margin -5.0% 27.6% -29.0%
FCF margin 20.3% 23.1% 26.5%
Operating cash flow margin 21.2% 24.4% 27.3%
Return on equity -5.4% 21.1% -19.5%
Return on assets -3.2% 7.7% -8.9%
Return on invested capital – 3.9% -17.2%
Return on capital employed -8.8% 5.6% -12.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.1x 0.9x -0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 21.8% 1.5% 16.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTLBFISU
Debt / assets – 48.0% 8.4%
Debt / equity – 1.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.9x 13.2x
Debt / FCF – 7.5x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 41.5% 63.6% 54.4%
Equity / assets 58.5% 36.4% 45.6%
Interest coverage – 3.2x -25.5x
Current ratio 2.4x 0.5x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.4x 1.9x
Cash ratio 1.9x 0.1x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 8.24 0.05 2.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTLBFISU
Dividend yield – 4.6% –
Net buyback yield 1.3% 3.7% -0.6%
Shareholder yield 1.3% 8.4% -0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 25.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 31.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTLBFISU
Forward P/E 62.9xFY2026 5.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.90FY2026 $6.37FY2026 $-0.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.2%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +21.1% +6.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.08BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 $2.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +21.5%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.3% +4.6% +30.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTLBFISU
Held by institutions 95.7% 98.7% 84.7%
Institutions holding 397 857 559
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.9% +3.5% +8.0%
Institutions buying 231 415 307
Institutions selling 122 332 161
Buyers to sellers 1.89 1.25 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTLBFISU
GTLB 1.00 0.34 0.33
FIS 0.34 1.00 0.26
U 0.33 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTLB, FIS and U?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gitlab (GTLB) $8.83B, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) $20.66B, Unity Software (U) $17.16B.

Which company is growing faster?

Gitlab (GTLB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) +18.3%, Unity Software (U) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has the highest net margin (Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 27.6%, Unity Software (U) -29.0%). On return on invested capital, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 3.9%, Unity Software (U) -17.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gitlab (GTLB) returned the most: Gitlab (GTLB) +17.9%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -39.4%, Unity Software (U) +5.7%. Over five years, Gitlab (GTLB) compounded fastest (Gitlab (GTLB) -12.8%/yr, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -19.6%/yr, Unity Software (U) -23.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Gitlab (GTLB) 0.00%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 0.04%, Unity Software (U) 0.00%. Gitlab (GTLB) and Unity Software (U) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has been the steadiest (Gitlab (GTLB) 59.7%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 34.2%, Unity Software (U) 74.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTLB, FIS and U?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.