GSM vs NEXA vs TECK Stock Comparison

Ferroglobe, Nexa Resources and Teck Resources Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ALM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GSM Ferroglobe PLC
$3.84 -9.9% 1M -20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$717.54M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.37B
Div. yield
1.15%
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins
NEXA Nexa Resources S.A.
$11.44 -6.5% 1M +96.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.52B
P/E
5.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.43B
Div. yield
1.14%
Copper Basic Materials
3 wins
TECK Teck Resources Ltd
$62.71 -8.5% 1M +46.1% 1Y
Market cap
$30.63B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.90B
Div. yield
0.83%
Copper Basic Materials
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Teck Resources leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Teck Resources 7, Nexa Resources 3, Ferroglobe 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSMNEXATECKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $717.54M $1.52B $30.63B TECK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -17.9x 5.0x 11.3x NEXA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 4.0x 13.5x NEXA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -8.5% +30.1% +45.2% TECK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.0% 5.6% 25.2% TECK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.5% — 25.6% TECK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 0.1x -0.4x GSM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.15% 1.14% 0.83% GSM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.8% +96.9% +46.1% NEXA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.0%/yr +6.8%/yr +17.9%/yr TECK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.7% 74.5% 46.8% TECK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 73/100 77/100 TECK

Percentile Scorecard

GSMNEXATECK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSMNEXATECK
Valuation 77 #38 of 165 100 #1 of 165 82 #30 of 165
Growth 19 #122 of 150 82 #28 of 150 81 #29 of 150
Profitability 38 #76 of 122 65 #44 of 122 86 #18 of 122
Financial Health 51 #82 of 166 50 #83 of 166 55 #75 of 166
Shareholder Returns 65 #38 of 107 67 #36 of 107 82 #20 of 107
Overall 50 73 77
  • GSM ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • NEXA ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • TECK ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSMNEXATECKSPY
1 month -9.9%-6.5%-8.5% -2.3%
3 months +18.2%-11.2%+4.2% -0.7%
6 months -18.1%-26.2%+10.5% +4.8%
Year to date -17.2%+29.3%+30.9% +10.3%
1 year -20.8%+96.9%+46.1% +10.3%
3 years -18.3%+95.9%+68.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year -6.5%+25.1%+19.0% +20.1%
5 years -44.3%+38.7%+128.0% +61.9%
5 years, per year -11.0%+6.8%+17.9% +10.1%
10 years -56.6%—+204.1% +258.6%
10 years, per year -8.0%—+11.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGSMNEXATECKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.7%74.5%46.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.2%76.9%45.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.372.392.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.351.300.98 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.2%-59.3%-47.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.5%-31.6%-12.9% -3.5%
52-week high $5.45$16.72$71.97 $779.14
52-week low $3.14$5.25$38.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSMNEXATECK
P/E now vs peer median -17.9xmedian 12.5x 5.0xmedian 12.5x 11.3xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.9x 0.3xmedian 2.9x 2.8xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.6xmedian 7.3x 1.2xmedian 7.3x 3.9xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 49.2xmedian 14.6x 1.6xmedian 14.6x 11.0xmedian 14.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x 1.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.57median 0.28 0.11median 0.28 0.52median 0.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSMNEXATECK
Revenue $1.37B $5.43B $10.90B
Gross profit – $1.60B $4.37B
Operating income -$37.28M $992.90M $5.77B
Net income -$45.85M -$204.70M $2.73B
Free cash flow $14.57M $977.40M $2.78B
R&D – $116.30M $61.23M
EPS (diluted) $-0.21 $2.29 $5.55
Cash & equivalents $93.08M – $4.71B
Total debt $60.01M $130.36M $2.59B
Shares (diluted) 188.36M 132.44M 495.40M
Enterprise value $233.78M $469.52M $11.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSMNEXATECK
P/E -17.9x 5.0x 11.3x
P/FCF 49.2x 1.6x 11.0x
P/Operating cash flow 15.0x 2.6x –
P/S 0.5x 0.3x 2.8x
P/B 1.0x – 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.4x – 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 10.6x 1.2x 3.9x
EV/EBIT -18.4x 1.6x 4.8x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 0.3x 2.5x
EV/FCF 47.0x 1.7x 10.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.3x 2.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.57 0.11 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSMNEXATECK
Revenue growth (1Y) -8.5% 30.1% 45.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.4% 25.9% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 96.6% 176.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 72.3% 9.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.3% 88.3% 149.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -28.6% 118.9% 30.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 48.4% 12.2% 590.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.4% 0.6% 245.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 53.0% 900.8% 336.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -31.2% 45.6% 21.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -38.8% -3.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -47.3% 27.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -62.7% 176.5% 530.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -62.9% 98.0% -9.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSMNEXATECK
Gross margin – 29.5% 40.1%
EBITDA margin 4.7% 24.1% 65.8%
Operating margin -2.7% 18.3% 53.0%
Pretax margin -1.6% 32.0% 43.5%
Net margin -3.0% 5.6% 25.2%
FCF margin 1.1% 18.0% 25.5%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 10.6% –
Return on equity -6.6% – 13.7%
Return on assets -3.0% -3.7% 7.9%
Return on invested capital -4.5% – 25.6%
Return on capital employed -2.6% 18.2% 18.5%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.0x -2.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSMNEXATECK
Debt / assets 3.9% 2.4% 7.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 0.1x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 4.1x 0.1x 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 53.7% 73.8% 42.0%
Equity / assets 46.3% – 58.0%
Interest coverage -1.8x 2.6x 9.2x
Current ratio 5.9x – 2.8x
Quick ratio 3.1x 1.4x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.4x 1.6x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSMNEXATECK
Dividend yield 1.1% 1.1% 0.8%
Net buyback yield -0.7% – 2.7%
Shareholder yield 0.5% 1.1% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSMNEXATECK
Forward P/E – 4.0xFY2026 13.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.05FY2026 $2.86FY2026 $4.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +186.0%FY2026 +107.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +17.5% -14.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.43BFY2026 $3.54BFY2026 $10.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.6%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +34.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% -1.8% +11.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSMNEXATECK
Held by institutions 55.9% 11.3% –
Institutions holding 174 109 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% -6.6% –
Institutions buying 94 85 –
Institutions selling 58 19 –
Buyers to sellers 1.62 4.47 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSMNEXATECK
GSM 1.00 0.40 0.33
NEXA 0.40 1.00 0.55
TECK 0.33 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GSM, NEXA and TECK?

Teck Resources (TECK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferroglobe (GSM) $717.54M, Nexa Resources (NEXA) $1.52B, Teck Resources (TECK) $30.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, GSM, NEXA and TECK?

Nexa Resources (NEXA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferroglobe (GSM) -17.9x, Nexa Resources (NEXA) 5.0x, Teck Resources (TECK) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nexa Resources (NEXA) is cheapest (Nexa Resources (NEXA) 4.0x, Teck Resources (TECK) 13.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teck Resources (TECK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferroglobe (GSM) -8.5%, Nexa Resources (NEXA) +30.1%, Teck Resources (TECK) +45.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teck Resources (TECK) has the highest net margin (Ferroglobe (GSM) -3.0%, Nexa Resources (NEXA) 5.6%, Teck Resources (TECK) 25.2%). On return on invested capital, Teck Resources (TECK) leads (Ferroglobe (GSM) -4.5%, Teck Resources (TECK) 25.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nexa Resources (NEXA) returned the most: Ferroglobe (GSM) -20.8%, Nexa Resources (NEXA) +96.9%, Teck Resources (TECK) +46.1%. Over five years, Teck Resources (TECK) compounded fastest (Ferroglobe (GSM) -11.0%/yr, Nexa Resources (NEXA) +6.8%/yr, Teck Resources (TECK) +17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ferroglobe (GSM) has the highest dividend yield: Ferroglobe (GSM) 1.15%, Nexa Resources (NEXA) 1.14%, Teck Resources (TECK) 0.83%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Teck Resources (TECK) has been the steadiest (Ferroglobe (GSM) 58.7%, Nexa Resources (NEXA) 74.5%, Teck Resources (TECK) 46.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GSM, NEXA and TECK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teck Resources (TECK) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.