GLW vs KOP vs NWGL Stock Comparison

Corning, Koppers Holdings and CL Workshop Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$128.89 -18.8% 1M +42.8% 1Y
Market cap
$106.33B
P/E
49.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.72B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
7 wins
KOP Koppers Holdings Inc.
$41.83 -9.3% 1M +43.0% 1Y
Market cap
$801.56M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.89B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Corning leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Corning 7, Koppers Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLWKOPNWGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $106.33B $801.56M $1.05M GLW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 49.5x -9.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.4x 10.9x — KOP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.8% -5.0% — GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.1% -4.6% — GLW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.0% -2.7% — GLW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 23.6x — GLW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.8% +43.0% -94.4% KOP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.4%/yr +3.6%/yr — GLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.5% 35.6% 223.5% KOP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 48/100 — GLW

Percentile Scorecard

GLWKOPNWGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLWKOPNWGL
Valuation 23 #73 of 94 74 #25 of 94 –
Growth 96 #5 of 92 28 #67 of 92 –
Profitability 85 #14 of 86 40 #52 of 86 –
Financial Health 60 #38 of 93 17 #77 of 93 7 #269 of 288
Shareholder Returns 33 #48 of 71 79 #16 of 71 –
Overall 59 48 –
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • KOP ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • NWGL ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLWKOPNWGLSPY
1 month -18.8%-9.3%-93.8% +0.7%
3 months -4.8%-14.8%-60.9% +3.7%
6 months -21.5%+2.4%-90.5% +7.1%
Year to date +47.2%+54.5%-93.7% +12.8%
1 year +42.8%+43.0%-94.4% +11.9%
3 years +383.5%+15.1%-99.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +69.2%+4.8%-79.8% +22.8%
5 years +262.4%+19.2%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +29.4%+3.6%— +10.9%
10 years +468.3%+29.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.0%+2.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLWKOPNWGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.5%35.6%223.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.3%36.3%290.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.030.962.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.571.21-0.42 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.6%-58.8%-99.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.6%-20.1%-94.4% -1.2%
52-week high $255.69$52.33$1.61 $779.14
52-week low $78.03$26.67$0.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLWKOPNWGL
P/E now vs peer median 51.7xmedian 21.0x -9.2xmedian 21.0x —median 17.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.4x 0.4xmedian 1.4x —median 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 12.9x 45.4xmedian 12.9x —median 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 45.1xmedian 15.5x 5.7xmedian 15.5x —median 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 1.7x 0.8xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.97median 1.68 0.20median 1.68 —median 0.78

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLWKOPNWGL
Revenue $17.72B $1.89B –
Gross profit $6.46B $423.40M –
Operating income $2.92B -$42.30M –
Net income $2.35B -$86.90M –
Free cash flow $2.46B $138.70M –
R&D $1.18B – –
EPS (diluted) $2.47 $-4.54 –
Cash & equivalents $2.54B $40.70M $200.00K
Total debt $8.23B $897.60M -$11.23M
Shares (diluted) 871.00M 19.13M 16.55M
Enterprise value $98.01B $642.16M -$3.42M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLWKOPNWGL
P/E 51.7x -9.2x –
P/FCF 45.1x 5.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 26.5x 4.1x –
P/S 6.3x 0.4x –
P/B 7.8x 2.0x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 2.7x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x 45.4x –
EV/EBIT 40.0x -39.0x –
EV/Revenue 6.6x 0.9x –
EV/FCF 47.4x 11.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 27.8x 8.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.97 0.20 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLWKOPNWGL
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.8% -5.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.9% -3.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 21.4% -0.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.0% 2.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 46.0% -134.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 48.2% -30.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 57.2% -675.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 53.6% -44.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 56.9% -708.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.6% -46.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 85.0% 44.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% 34.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 111.8% 92.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.0% 83.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLWKOPNWGL
Gross margin 36.5% 22.4% –
EBITDA margin 24.9% 1.9% –
Operating margin 16.5% -2.2% –
Pretax margin 15.9% -5.2% –
Net margin 12.1% -4.6% –
FCF margin 13.9% 7.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.7% 10.1% –
Return on equity 17.1% -18.6% –
Return on assets 7.0% -4.8% –
Return on invested capital 11.0% -2.7% –
Return on capital employed 10.8% -2.8% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x -2.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLWKOPNWGL
Debt / assets 24.1% 52.1% 46.3%
Debt / equity 0.6x 2.3x 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 23.6x –
Debt / FCF 3.3x 6.5x –
Liabilities / assets 58.1% 77.5% 78.5%
Equity / assets 41.9% 22.5% 21.5%
Interest coverage 8.0x -0.7x –
Current ratio 1.7x 2.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.9x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 5.04 1.97 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLWKOPNWGL
Dividend yield 0.9% 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -0.5% 6.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 7.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 43.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 41.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLWKOPNWGL
Forward P/E 37.4xFY2026 10.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.45FY2026 $3.83FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +36.9%FY2026 -5.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +24.1% +23.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.34BFY2026 $1.85BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +31.0% +2.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLWKOPNWGL
Held by institutions 73.0% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 2,684 219 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +1.7% –
Institutions buying 1,477 108 –
Institutions selling 950 66 –
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLWKOPNWGL
GLW 1.00 0.15 0.12
KOP 0.15 1.00 0.14
NWGL 0.12 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLW, KOP and NWGL?

Corning (GLW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corning (GLW) $106.33B, Koppers Holdings (KOP) $801.56M, CL Workshop (NWGL) $1.05M.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corning (GLW) +18.8%, Koppers Holdings (KOP) -5.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corning (GLW) has the highest net margin (Corning (GLW) 12.1%, Koppers Holdings (KOP) -4.6%). On return on invested capital, Corning (GLW) leads (Corning (GLW) 11.0%, Koppers Holdings (KOP) -2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Koppers Holdings (KOP) returned the most: Corning (GLW) +42.8%, Koppers Holdings (KOP) +43.0%, CL Workshop (NWGL) -94.4%. Over five years, Corning (GLW) compounded fastest (Corning (GLW) +29.4%/yr, Koppers Holdings (KOP) +3.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Corning (GLW) 0.01%, Koppers Holdings (KOP) 0.00%, CL Workshop (NWGL) 0.00%. Koppers Holdings (KOP) and CL Workshop (NWGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koppers Holdings (KOP) has been the steadiest (Corning (GLW) 74.5%, Koppers Holdings (KOP) 35.6%, CL Workshop (NWGL) 223.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLW, KOP and NWGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corning (GLW) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.