GFS vs RGTI vs TXN Stock Comparison

Globalfoundries, Rigetti Computing and Texas Instruments Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (INTC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$36.33 -25.3% 1M +2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$21.46B
P/E
108.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.15B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
2 wins
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.
$9.78 -35.5% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.91B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$13.35M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
1 win
TXN Texas Instruments Inc
$278.15 -6.4% 1M +70.0% 1Y
Market cap
$253.31B
P/E
35.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.77B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Texas Instruments leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Texas Instruments 8, Globalfoundries 2, Rigetti Computing 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGFSRGTITXNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.46B $3.91B $253.31B TXN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 108.9x -16.4x 35.8x TXN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x — 32.5x GFS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.3% +68.5% +20.3% RGTI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% -1,787.4% 34.1% TXN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.8% — 22.9% TXN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — 0.5x GFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.0% -73.8% +70.0% TXN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.6%/yr -1.9%/yr +7.5%/yr TXN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.9% 93.0% 43.6% TXN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 31/100 67/100 TXN

Percentile Scorecard

GFSRGTITXN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGFSRGTITXN
Valuation 91 #9 of 94 15 #105 of 124 51 #47 of 94
Growth 50 #47 of 92 19 #93 of 114 66 #32 of 92
Profitability 47 #48 of 90 9 #101 of 111 98 #3 of 90
Financial Health 51 #50 of 101 88 #16 of 128 43 #58 of 101
Shareholder Returns 24 #62 of 81 23 #57 of 74 78 #19 of 81
Overall 53 31 67
  • GFS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • RGTI ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • TXN ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGFSRGTITXNSPY
1 month -25.3%-35.5%-6.4% -5.9%
3 months -27.9%-40.8%-0.1% -4.6%
6 months -48.8%-46.7%-2.5% +0.2%
Year to date +4.0%-55.8%+60.3% +7.5%
1 year +2.0%-73.8%+70.0% +8.2%
3 years -29.7%+840.4%+88.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year -11.1%+111.2%+23.6% +19.0%
5 years -42.9%-9.0%+43.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -10.6%-1.9%+7.5% +9.4%
10 years ——+311.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+15.2% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureGFSRGTITXNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.9%93.0%43.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.9%89.3%39.1% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.203.791.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.03-0.791.61 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.5%-96.9%-33.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.6%-73.8%-16.3% -5.9%
52-week high $89.96$37.29$332.28 $779.14
52-week low $32.24$9.78$153.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGFSRGTITXN
P/E now vs peer median 102.4xmedian 35.6x -13.7xmedian 39.4x 35.9xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 5.8x 244.4xmedian 4.0x 12.2xmedian 5.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 21.9x -32.9xmedian 34.1x 24.2xmedian 21.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 30.7x -37.3xmedian 22.7x 34.7xmedian 30.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 3.5x 6.1xmedian 2.9x 13.2xmedian 3.5x
PEG now vs peer median -2.12median 1.25 3.46median 1.32 -242.35median 1.25

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGFSRGTITXN
Revenue $7.15B $13.35M $20.77B
Gross profit $2.04B $4.62M $12.51B
Operating income $839.00M -$97.16M $8.47B
Net income $201.00M -$238.67M $7.11B
Free cash flow $2.48B -$87.58M $7.32B
R&D $623.00M $73.05M $2.10B
EPS (diluted) $0.35 $-0.72 $7.68
Cash & equivalents $997.00M $27.76M $4.21B
Total debt $1.14B – $13.56B
Shares (diluted) 558.00M 333.22M 921.00M
Enterprise value $10.79B $2.20B $228.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGFSRGTITXN
P/E 102.4x -13.7x 35.9x
P/FCF 8.1x -37.3x 34.7x
P/Operating cash flow 12.2x -53.7x 25.7x
P/S 2.8x 244.4x 12.2x
P/B 1.7x 6.1x 13.2x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 6.1x 13.5x
EV/EBITDA 9.1x -32.9x 24.2x
EV/EBIT 22.7x -29.5x 30.7x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 214.9x 12.5x
EV/FCF 7.7x -32.8x 35.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.5x -47.3x 26.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.12 3.46 -242.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGFSRGTITXN
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.3% 68.5% 20.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.2% -2.5% 4.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.8% 43.8% 26.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.5% -26.6% 2.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 627.7% -25.6% 42.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -9.0% -0.3% 2.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 590.2% -44.8% 41.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -47.7% -42.8% 0.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 543.7% -29.6% 39.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -48.3% -4.0% -0.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.4% -12.9% 43.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.9% 0.3% 14.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 112.7% -33.6% 251.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 142.9% -3.5% 64.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGFSRGTITXN
Gross margin 28.5% 34.6% 60.2%
EBITDA margin 29.4% -653.3% 51.7%
Operating margin 11.7% -727.6% 40.8%
Pretax margin 6.4% -1,787% 39.1%
Net margin 2.8% -1,787% 34.1%
FCF margin 34.7% -655.9% 35.2%
Operating cash flow margin 23.2% -454.7% 47.7%
Return on equity 1.7% -42.6% 38.3%
Return on assets 1.2% -36.7% 19.6%
Return on invested capital 4.8% – 22.9%
Return on capital employed 5.7% -17.8% 25.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.3x 0.3x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% 170.7% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGFSRGTITXN
Debt / assets 6.7% – 36.8%
Debt / equity 0.1x – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – 0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.5x – 1.9x
Liabilities / assets 29.7% 17.1% 47.9%
Equity / assets 70.3% 82.9% 52.1%
Interest coverage – – 15.0x
Current ratio 2.6x 3.9x 5.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 3.8x 3.6x
Cash ratio 1.0x 3.7x 2.7x
Altman Z-score 2.20 16.06 12.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGFSRGTITXN
Dividend yield 0.7% – 2.1%
Net buyback yield -2.5% -1.6% -0.1%
Shareholder yield -1.8% -1.6% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGFSRGTITXN
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 – 32.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.82FY2026 $-0.20FY2026 $8.57FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.8%FY2026 – +57.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +33.5% – +28.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.96BFY2026 $22.61MFY2026 $23.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +218.9%FY2026 +30.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.0% +115.1% +8.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGFSRGTITXN
Held by institutions 98.4% 52.1% 89.1%
Institutions holding 439 478 2,868
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.0% +0.0% +3.6%
Institutions buying 306 309 1,587
Institutions selling 88 87 944
Buyers to sellers 3.48 3.55 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GFSRGTITXN
GFS 1.00 0.45 0.54
RGTI 0.45 1.00 0.27
TXN 0.54 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GFS, RGTI and TXN?

Texas Instruments (TXN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globalfoundries (GFS) $21.46B, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) $3.91B, Texas Instruments (TXN) $253.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, GFS, RGTI and TXN?

Texas Instruments (TXN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Globalfoundries (GFS) 108.9x, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) -16.4x, Texas Instruments (TXN) 35.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Globalfoundries (GFS) is cheapest (Globalfoundries (GFS) 20.0x, Texas Instruments (TXN) 32.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rigetti Computing (RGTI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globalfoundries (GFS) +5.3%, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) +68.5%, Texas Instruments (TXN) +20.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Texas Instruments (TXN) has the highest net margin (Globalfoundries (GFS) 2.8%, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) -1,787.4%, Texas Instruments (TXN) 34.1%). On return on invested capital, Texas Instruments (TXN) leads (Globalfoundries (GFS) 4.8%, Texas Instruments (TXN) 22.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Texas Instruments (TXN) returned the most: Globalfoundries (GFS) +2.0%, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) -73.8%, Texas Instruments (TXN) +70.0%. Over five years, Texas Instruments (TXN) compounded fastest (Globalfoundries (GFS) -10.6%/yr, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) -1.9%/yr, Texas Instruments (TXN) +7.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Texas Instruments (TXN) has been the steadiest (Globalfoundries (GFS) 61.9%, Rigetti Computing (RGTI) 93.0%, Texas Instruments (TXN) 43.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GFS, RGTI and TXN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Texas Instruments (TXN) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.