GFS vs MU Stock Comparison

Globalfoundries and Micron Technology Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$45.00 -8.2% 1M +27.4% 1Y
Market cap
$25.91B
P/E
36.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.94B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
2 wins
MU Micron Technology Inc
$903.70 -16.5% 1M +312.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.05T
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$133.19B
Div. yield
0.00%
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Micron Technology leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Micron Technology 8, Globalfoundries 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGFSMULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.91B $1.05T MU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.2x 12.3x MU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.7x 4.9x MU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.4% +256.3% MU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.3% 63.8% MU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.1% 67.7% MU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x -0.4x GFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.4% +312.6% MU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +67.7%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.3% 80.8% GFS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 87/100 MU

Percentile Scorecard

GFSMU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGFSMU
Valuation 93 #8 of 95 88 #12 of 95
Growth 38 #58 of 93 100 #1 of 93
Profitability 54 #42 of 91 100 #1 of 91
Financial Health 46 #55 of 101 73 #28 of 101
Shareholder Returns 70 #23 of 75 76 #19 of 75
Overall 60 87
  • GFS ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • MU ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGFSMUSPY
1 month -8.2%-16.5% -0.8%
3 months -15.4%+0.4% +3.5%
6 months -25.4%+72.3% +7.0%
Year to date +28.9%+216.6% +12.2%
1 year +27.4%+312.6% +13.0%
3 years -13.4%+1,276.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -4.7%+139.8% +23.1%
5 years —+1,224.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+67.7% +11.0%
10 years —+5,023.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+48.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGFSMUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.3%80.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.8%74.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.173.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.453.87 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.5%-57.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.0%-25.5% -1.8%
52-week high $89.96$1,213.56 $779.14
52-week low $32.24$201.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGFSMU
P/E now vs peer median 34.9xmedian 42.1x 12.0xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 7.1x 7.7xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 27.5x 9.0xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.4xmedian 37.2x 17.3xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 4.2x 7.4xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.58median 2.23 0.08median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGFSMU
Revenue $6.94B $133.19B
Gross profit $1.88B $107.50B
Operating income $804.00M $99.34B
Net income $720.00M $84.97B
Free cash flow $796.00M $58.96B
R&D $563.00M $5.65B
EPS (diluted) $1.28 $74.34
Cash & equivalents $1.09B $38.36B
Total debt $1.12B $5.18B
Shares (diluted) 558.00M 1.14B
Enterprise value $14.22B $953.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGFSMU
P/E 34.9x 12.0x
P/FCF 31.4x 17.3x
P/Operating cash flow 13.1x 11.4x
P/S 3.6x 7.7x
P/B 2.1x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 7.4x
EV/EBITDA 11.6x 9.0x
EV/EBIT 29.6x 9.9x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 7.4x
EV/FCF 29.9x 16.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.4x 11.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.58 0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGFSMU
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.4% 256.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.1% 104.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.8% 622.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.2% 327.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 575.7% 916.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.7% 168.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 742.9% 895.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -21.6% 154.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 717.0% 879.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -22.1% 151.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.2% 411.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.4% 286.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -18.1% 3,435%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.2% 126.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGFSMU
Gross margin 27.1% 80.7%
EBITDA margin 29.5% 81.7%
Operating margin 11.6% 74.6%
Pretax margin 12.6% 74.8%
Net margin 10.3% 63.8%
FCF margin 11.5% 44.3%
Operating cash flow margin 27.6% 67.3%
Return on equity 6.1% 71.0%
Return on assets 4.3% 51.5%
Return on invested capital 5.1% 67.7%
Return on capital employed 5.5% 72.2%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGFSMU
Debt / assets 6.6% 2.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.4x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 30.0% 29.4%
Equity / assets 70.0% 70.6%
Interest coverage – 937.2x
Current ratio 2.5x 3.3x
Quick ratio 1.4x 2.9x
Cash ratio 1.1x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 2.75 14.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGFSMU
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.1%
Net buyback yield 1.6% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 0.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 1.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 16.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGFSMU
Forward P/E 24.7xFY2026 4.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $1.82FY2026 $184.21FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +5.8%FY2026 +143.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +33.5% +17.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.96BFY2026 $294.86BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +121.4%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +23.0% +15.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGFSMU
Held by institutions 98.4% 77.9%
Institutions holding 438 3,898
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.0% +4.2%
Institutions buying 305 2,302
Institutions selling 88 1,431
Buyers to sellers 3.47 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GFSMU
GFS 1.00 0.57
MU 0.57 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GFS and MU?

Micron Technology (MU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globalfoundries (GFS) $25.91B, Micron Technology (MU) $1.05T.

Which stock is cheaper, GFS and MU?

Micron Technology (MU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Globalfoundries (GFS) 36.2x, Micron Technology (MU) 12.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Micron Technology (MU) is cheapest (Globalfoundries (GFS) 24.7x, Micron Technology (MU) 4.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Micron Technology (MU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globalfoundries (GFS) +1.4%, Micron Technology (MU) +256.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Micron Technology (MU) has the highest net margin (Globalfoundries (GFS) 10.3%, Micron Technology (MU) 63.8%). On return on invested capital, Micron Technology (MU) leads (Globalfoundries (GFS) 5.1%, Micron Technology (MU) 67.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Micron Technology (MU) returned the most: Globalfoundries (GFS) +27.4%, Micron Technology (MU) +312.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Globalfoundries (GFS) 0.00%, Micron Technology (MU) 0.00%. Globalfoundries (GFS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Globalfoundries (GFS) has been the steadiest (Globalfoundries (GFS) 60.3%, Micron Technology (MU) 80.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do GFS and MU move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.57, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, GFS and MU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Micron Technology (MU) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.