GAME vs WPP vs EAIQ Stock Comparison

GameSquare Holdings, Wpp and Eyeonix AIQ Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NCMI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GAME GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
$2.59 -15.9% 1M +286.6% 1Y
Market cap
$33.14M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$56.04M
Div. yield
–
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
1 win
WPP WPP plc
$26.98 +6.7% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.82B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
3.71%
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
3 wins
EAIQ Eyeonix AIQ, Inc.
$1.25 +4.2% 1M +31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$32.66M
P/E
514.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Wpp leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Wpp 3, GameSquare Holdings 1, Eyeonix AIQ 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGAMEWPPEAIQLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $33.14M $5.82B $32.66M WPP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.7x — 514.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.3% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -81.4% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -76.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.71% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +286.6% +15.2% +31.6% GAME
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -30.6%/yr -17.9%/yr — WPP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 221.1% 55.8% 124.2% WPP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 — 42/100 EAIQ

Percentile Scorecard

GAMEWPPEAIQ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGAMEWPPEAIQ
Valuation 14 #46 of 53 – 27 #39 of 53
Growth 72 #13 of 44 – 93 #4 of 44
Profitability 2 #41 of 42 – –
Financial Health 20 #49 of 61 25 #46 of 61 7 #57 of 61
Shareholder Returns – 48 #14 of 26 –
Overall 27 – 42
  • GAME ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • WPP ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • EAIQ ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGAMEWPPEAIQSPY
1 month -15.9%+6.7%+4.2% +0.7%
3 months +619.4%+32.0%+204.9% +3.7%
6 months +370.9%+49.1%+204.9% +7.1%
Year to date +581.6%+20.1%+31.6% +12.8%
1 year +286.6%+15.2%+31.6% +11.9%
3 years +26.3%-36.7%+4.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +8.1%-14.1%+1.4% +22.8%
5 years -83.9%-62.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -30.6%-17.9%— +10.9%
10 years —-74.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —-12.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGAMEWPPEAIQSPY
Volatility, 1Y 221.1%55.8%124.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 96.5%54.5%— 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.851.10-0.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.300.270.25 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.6%-81.8%-95.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.6%-2.1%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $3.68$27.56$1.25 $779.14
52-week low $0.25$15.11$0.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGAMEWPPEAIQ
P/E now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 18.7x —median 18.7x 514.8xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x —median 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 10.6x —median 10.6x —median 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 9.0x —median 9.0x -1,216xmedian 9.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 1.6x 1.6xmedian 1.6x -196.5xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.49 —median 0.49 —median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGAMEWPPEAIQ
Revenue $56.04M – –
Gross profit $25.41M – –
Operating income -$22.84M – -$35.05K
Net income -$45.59M – $63.43K
Free cash flow – – -$26.87K
R&D $2.37M – –
EPS (diluted) $-3.84 – $0.00
Cash & equivalents $4.46M $3.13B $6.31K
Total debt $12.10M $7.08B –
Shares (diluted) 11.86M 215.20M 26.12M
Enterprise value $8.33M -$5.97B $32.63M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGAMEWPPEAIQ
P/E -0.7x – 514.8x
P/FCF – – -1,216x
P/Operating cash flow – – -1,216x
P/S 0.6x – –
P/B 3.4x 1.6x -196.5x
P/Tangible book -2.4x 2.2x -196.5x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x – –
EV/EBIT -1.8x – -931.6x
EV/Revenue 0.7x – –
EV/FCF – – -1,215x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -1,215x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGAMEWPPEAIQ
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.3% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 115.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.3% – -40.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 3.5% – 238.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -109.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 53.3% – 238.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.0% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGAMEWPPEAIQ
Gross margin 45.3% – –
EBITDA margin -38.1% – –
Operating margin -40.8% – –
Pretax margin -65.6% – –
Net margin -81.4% – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity -200.2% – –
Return on assets -66.0% – 493.0%
Return on invested capital -76.6% – –
Return on capital employed -94.7% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGAMEWPPEAIQ
Debt / assets 20.5% 22.7% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 83.2% 88.2% 1,656%
Equity / assets 16.8% 11.8% -1,556%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.9x 0.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -4.55 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGAMEWPPEAIQ
Dividend yield – 3.7% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 3.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGAMEWPPEAIQ
Forward P/E – 8.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.57FY2026 $3.38FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -20.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +5.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $80.56MFY2026 $12.28BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +79.0%FY2026 -10.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +60.5% +9.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGAMEWPPEAIQ
Held by institutions 12.5% 11.5% –
Institutions holding 44 142 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -13.3% -0.4% –
Institutions buying 18 81 –
Institutions selling 10 35 –
Buyers to sellers 1.80 2.31 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GAMEWPPEAIQ
GAME 1.00 0.08 0.01
WPP 0.08 1.00 -0.02
EAIQ 0.01 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GAME, WPP and EAIQ?

Wpp (WPP) is the largest by market capitalisation: GameSquare Holdings (GAME) $33.14M, Wpp (WPP) $5.82B, Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) $32.66M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GameSquare Holdings (GAME) returned the most: GameSquare Holdings (GAME) +286.6%, Wpp (WPP) +15.2%, Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) +31.6%. Over five years, Wpp (WPP) compounded fastest (GameSquare Holdings (GAME) -30.6%/yr, Wpp (WPP) -17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Wpp (WPP) 3.71%. GameSquare Holdings (GAME) and Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wpp (WPP) has been the steadiest (GameSquare Holdings (GAME) 221.1%, Wpp (WPP) 55.8%, Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) 124.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GAME, WPP and EAIQ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wpp (WPP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.