FN vs ASX vs UCTT Stock Comparison

Fabrinet, ASE Technology Holding and Ultra Clean Holdings Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FN Fabrinet
$341.73 -24.6% 1M -25.6% 1Y
Market cap
$12.25B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.14B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 6, Fabrinet 4, Ultra Clean Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNASXUCTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.25B $83.34B $2.01B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.5x 33.4x 75.2x FN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.1x 29.5x 14.8x UCTT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +43.0% +24.1% +15.8% FN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.4% 9.8% 1.1% ASX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.8% 12.6% 3.2% FN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.2x 1.4x 2.0x FN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.07% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.6% +143.9% +68.7% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.2%/yr +38.9%/yr -5.4%/yr ASX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.9% 58.7% 90.7% ASX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 63/100 44/100 ASX

Percentile Scorecard

FNASXUCTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNASXUCTT
Valuation 42 #65 of 112 82 #18 of 94 66 #33 of 94
Growth 56 #48 of 108 87 #13 of 92 48 #48 of 92
Profitability 70 #32 of 104 66 #31 of 90 34 #60 of 90
Financial Health 71 #34 of 116 15 #86 of 101 10 #91 of 101
Shareholder Returns 57 #37 of 85 67 #27 of 79 64 #29 of 79
Overall 59 63 44
  • FN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • UCTT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNASXUCTTSPY
1 month -24.6%-21.1%-40.5% -1.0%
3 months -34.6%+1.9%-45.1% -0.4%
6 months -49.7%+9.7%-47.2% +4.5%
Year to date -24.9%+132.8%+73.9% +12.4%
1 year -25.6%+143.9%+68.7% +13.6%
3 years +110.3%+366.7%+70.6% +76.4%
3 years, per year +28.1%+67.2%+19.5% +20.8%
5 years +183.8%+417.0%-24.3% +63.7%
5 years, per year +23.2%+38.9%-5.4% +10.4%
10 years +812.5%+554.1%+408.5% +267.7%
10 years, per year +24.7%+20.7%+17.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFNASXUCTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.9%58.7%90.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.7%64.2%95.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.162.623.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.322.450.76 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.9%-43.1%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.2%-21.3%-69.1% -1.6%
52-week high $746.47$47.62$142.59 $779.14
52-week low $314.32$13.75$21.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNASXUCTT
P/E now vs peer median 25.5xmedian 28.1x 33.4xmedian 40.5x 75.2xmedian 40.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.6x 3.3xmedian 6.5x 0.8xmedian 6.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.6xmedian 18.4x 16.8xmedian 24.9x 12.8xmedian 24.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -64.3xmedian 26.6x 5.3xmedian 36.9x -12.3xmedian 36.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.8x 6.3xmedian 3.9x 2.5xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.02median 1.11 1.35median 1.85 0.30median 1.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNASXUCTT
Revenue $5.14B $24.92B $2.44B
Gross profit $613.87M $5.18B $393.80M
Operating income $514.70M $2.83B $105.50M
Net income $480.60M $3.27B $31.50M
Free cash flow -$190.49M $15.64B -$164.00M
R&D – $1.26B $34.90M
EPS (diluted) $13.26 $1.10 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $392.33M $2.78B $270.90M
Total debt $74.74M $10.90B $635.10M
Shares (diluted) 36.23M 2.21B 46.20M
Enterprise value $8.71B $71.67B $936.33M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
P/E 25.5x 33.4x 75.2x
P/FCF -64.3x 5.3x -12.3x
P/Operating cash flow 69.8x 12.8x -18.5x
P/S 2.4x 3.3x 0.8x
P/B 4.9x 6.3x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 7.4x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 19.6x 16.8x 12.8x
EV/EBIT 22.5x 32.1x 22.5x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 3.6x 1.0x
EV/FCF -60.7x 5.8x -14.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 65.9x 14.0x -21.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.02 1.35 0.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 43.0% 24.1% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.3% 8.9% 9.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.5% 53.2% 16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.0% 17.2% 7.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 50.6% 100.1% 214.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 22.2% 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.9% 110.4% 119.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.6% 18.9% 205.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.4% 114.2% 116.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.9% 24.7% 250.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -49.5% 92.0% -245.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.2% 19.6% -55.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -194.5% 86.3% -1,059%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -41.1% 39.2% -77.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Gross margin 11.9% 20.8% 16.1%
EBITDA margin 11.5% 21.8% 7.6%
Operating margin 10.0% 11.4% 4.3%
Pretax margin 11.4% 12.0% 3.6%
Net margin 9.4% 9.8% 1.1%
FCF margin -3.7% 62.8% -6.7%
Operating cash flow margin 3.4% 26.1% -4.4%
Return on equity 19.3% 25.7% 4.8%
Return on assets 11.7% 9.0% 1.8%
Return on invested capital 16.8% 12.6% 3.2%
Return on capital employed 21.1% 9.0% 6.9%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 2.0x -3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Debt / assets 1.7% 27.9% 30.2%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.8x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.2x 1.4x 2.0x
Debt / FCF -0.4x 0.7x -3.9x
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 66.0% 61.4%
Equity / assets 58.3% 34.0% 38.6%
Interest coverage 2,228x 10.9x 5.8x
Current ratio 2.0x 0.3x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.7x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 7.01 – 2.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Dividend yield – 1.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.3% – 0.2%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 1.1% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNASXUCTT
Forward P/E 20.1xFY2027 29.5xFY2026 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.97FY2027 $1.27FY2026 $2.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.4%FY2027 +126.8%FY2026 +183.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.3% +37.8% +102.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.84BFY2027 $24.36BFY2026 $2.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2027 +19.6%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +32.0% +38.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNASXUCTT
Held by institutions 100.0% 6.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 757 484 435
Change in shares held, QoQ -6.6% -2.5% +2.5%
Institutions buying 432 310 238
Institutions selling 246 133 163
Buyers to sellers 1.76 2.33 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNASXUCTT
FN 1.00 0.57 0.57
ASX 0.57 1.00 0.67
UCTT 0.57 0.67 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FN, ASX and UCTT?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fabrinet (FN) $12.25B, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $83.34B, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) $2.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, FN, ASX and UCTT?

Fabrinet (FN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fabrinet (FN) 25.5x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 33.4x, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 75.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) is cheapest (Fabrinet (FN) 20.1x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 29.5x, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fabrinet (FN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fabrinet (FN) +43.0%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +24.1%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has the highest net margin (Fabrinet (FN) 9.4%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 9.8%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 1.1%). On return on invested capital, Fabrinet (FN) leads (Fabrinet (FN) 16.8%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 12.6%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 3.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: Fabrinet (FN) -25.6%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +143.9%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +68.7%. Over five years, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compounded fastest (Fabrinet (FN) +23.2%/yr, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +38.9%/yr, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) -5.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 1.07%. Fabrinet (FN) and Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has been the steadiest (Fabrinet (FN) 79.9%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 58.7%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 90.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FN, ASX and UCTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.