FN vs ASX vs UCTT Stock Comparison

Fabrinet, ASE Technology Holding and Ultra Clean Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FLEX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FN Fabrinet
$348.37 -17.9% 1M -21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$11.60B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.64B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 7, Fabrinet 3, Ultra Clean Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNASXUCTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.60B $85.26B $2.20B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.5x 35.0x 82.9x FN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.5x 35.1x 18.4x UCTT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +35.7% +24.1% +15.8% FN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.2% 9.8% 1.1% FN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.6% 3.2% ASX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.4x 2.0x ASX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.5% +208.9% +91.3% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.4%/yr +44.4%/yr +2.0%/yr ASX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.0% 57.8% 90.2% ASX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 64/100 43/100 ASX

Percentile Scorecard

FNASXUCTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNASXUCTT
Valuation 46 #61 of 112 80 #20 of 94 61 #37 of 94
Growth 61 #43 of 108 88 #12 of 92 54 #43 of 92
Profitability 70 #32 of 104 69 #28 of 88 33 #59 of 88
Financial Health 58 #49 of 116 16 #81 of 96 10 #87 of 96
Shareholder Returns 52 #38 of 78 66 #25 of 72 55 #33 of 72
Overall 57 64 43
  • FN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • UCTT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNASXUCTTSPY
1 month -17.9%-1.6%-32.0% +0.7%
3 months -20.7%+28.1%-34.3% +3.7%
6 months -49.0%+41.9%-30.0% +7.1%
Year to date -23.5%+176.9%+115.9% +12.8%
1 year -21.5%+208.9%+91.3% +11.9%
3 years +125.6%+505.7%+128.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +31.2%+82.4%+31.8% +22.8%
5 years +262.9%+526.1%+10.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +29.4%+44.4%+2.0% +10.9%
10 years +821.6%+668.6%+555.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +24.9%+22.6%+20.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFNASXUCTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.0%57.8%90.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.2%62.4%94.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.162.603.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.283.611.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.8%-43.1%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.3%-6.4%-61.6% -1.2%
52-week high $746.47$47.62$142.59 $779.14
52-week low $314.98$13.75$21.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNASXUCTT
P/E now vs peer median 26.4xmedian 32.9x 39.8xmedian 46.4x 93.4xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.9x 4.0xmedian 7.8x 1.0xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 20.0x 19.9xmedian 27.5x 15.4xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2,957xmedian 30.2x 6.3xmedian 40.1x -15.2xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 2.9x 7.5xmedian 4.7x 3.1xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.07median 1.08 1.61median 2.10 0.37median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNASXUCTT
Revenue $4.64B $24.92B $2.44B
Gross profit $556.51M $5.18B $393.80M
Operating income $462.89M $2.83B $105.50M
Net income $473.03M $3.27B $31.50M
Free cash flow $4.22M $15.64B -$164.00M
R&D – $1.26B $34.90M
EPS (diluted) $13.05 $1.10 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $346.71M $2.78B $270.90M
Total debt – $10.90B $635.10M
Shares (diluted) 36.25M 2.21B 46.20M
Enterprise value $7.85B $72.62B $1.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
P/E 26.4x 39.8x 93.4x
P/FCF 2,957x 6.3x -15.2x
P/Operating cash flow 48.6x 15.2x -23.0x
P/S 2.7x 4.0x 1.0x
P/B 5.1x 7.5x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 5.1x 8.8x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 21.9x 19.9x 15.4x
EV/EBIT 25.1x 37.7x 27.1x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 4.3x 1.2x
EV/FCF 2,750x 6.8x -17.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 45.2x 16.4x -26.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.07 1.61 0.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 35.7% 24.1% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 8.9% 9.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 34.6% 53.2% 16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.3% 17.2% 7.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.7% 100.1% 214.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.5% 22.2% 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 42.3% 110.4% 119.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 18.9% 205.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.3% 114.2% 116.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.7% 24.7% 250.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -21.8% 92.0% -245.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 19.6% -55.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -98.0% 86.3% -1,059%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -69.7% 39.2% -77.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Gross margin 12.0% 20.8% 16.1%
EBITDA margin 11.4% 21.5% 7.6%
Operating margin 10.0% 11.4% 4.3%
Pretax margin 12.0% 12.0% 3.6%
Net margin 10.2% 9.8% 1.1%
FCF margin 0.1% 62.8% -6.7%
Operating cash flow margin 5.5% 26.1% -4.4%
Return on equity 19.9% 25.7% 4.8%
Return on assets 12.8% 9.0% 1.8%
Return on invested capital – 12.6% 3.2%
Return on capital employed 20.1% 9.0% 6.9%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.7x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 2.0x -3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Debt / assets – 27.9% 30.2%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.4x 2.0x
Debt / FCF – 0.7x -3.9x
Liabilities / assets 37.2% 66.0% 61.4%
Equity / assets 62.8% 34.0% 38.6%
Interest coverage – 10.9x 5.8x
Current ratio 2.3x 0.3x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.7x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 8.18 – 3.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNASXUCTT
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – 0.2%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.9% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNASXUCTT
Forward P/E 20.5xFY2027 35.1xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.97FY2027 $1.27FY2026 $2.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.4%FY2027 +126.8%FY2026 +183.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.3% +37.8% +102.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.84BFY2027 $24.36BFY2026 $2.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2027 +19.6%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +32.0% +38.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNASXUCTT
Held by institutions 100.0% 6.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 756 483 434
Change in shares held, QoQ -6.6% -2.5% +2.5%
Institutions buying 432 309 238
Institutions selling 245 133 162
Buyers to sellers 1.76 2.32 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNASXUCTT
FN 1.00 0.57 0.56
ASX 0.57 1.00 0.67
UCTT 0.56 0.67 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FN, ASX and UCTT?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fabrinet (FN) $11.60B, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $85.26B, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) $2.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, FN, ASX and UCTT?

Fabrinet (FN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fabrinet (FN) 24.5x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 35.0x, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 82.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) is cheapest (Fabrinet (FN) 20.5x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 35.1x, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 18.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fabrinet (FN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fabrinet (FN) +35.7%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +24.1%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fabrinet (FN) has the highest net margin (Fabrinet (FN) 10.2%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 9.8%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 1.1%). On return on invested capital, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 12.6%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 3.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: Fabrinet (FN) -21.5%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +208.9%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +91.3%. Over five years, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compounded fastest (Fabrinet (FN) +29.4%/yr, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +44.4%/yr, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has been the steadiest (Fabrinet (FN) 78.0%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 57.8%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 90.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FN, ASX and UCTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.