FLS vs IR vs MSA Stock Comparison

Flowserve, Ingersoll Rand and MSA Safety Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ITT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FLS Flowserve Corp
$80.17 +8.5% 1M +16.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.17B
P/E
40.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.70B
Div. yield
1.09%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$79.93 +4.5% 1M +0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$31.01B
P/E
32.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.94B
Div. yield
0.10%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
2 wins
MSA MSA Safety Inc
$179.16 -0.7% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.92B
P/E
22.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.95B
Div. yield
1.19%
Power Tools Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

MSA Safety leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (MSA Safety 7, Flowserve 3, Ingersoll Rand 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLSIRMSALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.17B $31.01B $6.92B IR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.0x 32.5x 22.0x MSA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.5x 23.9x 19.2x FLS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.2% +7.8% +6.5% IR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.4% 12.1% 16.1% MSA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 7.6% 15.9% MSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.8x 0.8x MSA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.09% 0.10% 1.19% MSA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.3% +0.3% +5.7% FLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.0%/yr +8.3%/yr +3.2%/yr FLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 33.5% 25.1% MSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 58/100 80/100 MSA

Percentile Scorecard

FLSIRMSA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLSIRMSA
Valuation 26 #150 of 203 42 #118 of 203 59 #83 of 203
Growth 31 #130 of 188 70 #57 of 188 86 #27 of 188
Profitability 43 #104 of 183 71 #54 of 183 97 #7 of 183
Financial Health 34 #144 of 216 50 #109 of 216 75 #55 of 216
Shareholder Returns 68 #50 of 152 57 #66 of 152 82 #29 of 152
Overall 40 58 80
  • FLS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • IR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MSA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLSIRMSASPY
1 month +8.5%+4.5%-0.7% +0.7%
3 months +6.4%-5.1%+2.8% +3.7%
6 months +8.9%+0.1%+7.7% +7.1%
Year to date +15.6%+0.9%+11.9% +12.8%
1 year +16.3%+0.3%+5.7% +11.9%
3 years +119.2%+32.0%+13.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +29.9%+9.7%+4.2% +22.8%
5 years +138.5%+48.7%+17.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year +19.0%+8.3%+3.2% +10.9%
10 years +89.9%—+224.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.6%—+12.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLSIRMSASPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%33.5%25.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.2%31.4%23.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.731.220.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.390.010.23 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-36.6%-34.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.9%-19.1%-11.8% -1.2%
52-week high $92.04$98.76$203.08 $779.14
52-week low $64.39$68.54$152.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLSIRMSA
P/E now vs peer median 40.0xmedian 25.8x 32.5xmedian 25.8x 22.0xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.9x 3.9xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 14.6x 17.6xmedian 14.6x 15.0xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.2xmedian 22.2x 25.4xmedian 22.2x 19.5xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.2x 3.0xmedian 2.2x 4.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 17.37median 1.45 2.61median 1.45 0.12median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLSIRMSA
Revenue $4.70B $7.94B $1.95B
Gross profit $1.60B $3.40B $925.88M
Operating income $467.63M $1.44B $413.17M
Net income $273.27M $966.00M $314.01M
Free cash flow $153.66M $1.22B $354.30M
R&D – – $68.19M
EPS (diluted) $1.99 $2.45 $8.11
Cash & equivalents $742.15M $1.17B $200.06M
Total debt $2.06B $4.77B $599.74M
Shares (diluted) 127.96M 391.90M 38.70M
Enterprise value $7.21B $26.21B $6.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLSIRMSA
P/E 40.0x 32.5x 22.0x
P/FCF 66.2x 25.4x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow 44.2x 23.0x 17.0x
P/S 2.2x 3.9x 3.6x
P/B 4.3x 3.0x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 5.0x 6.2x
EV/EBITDA 19.9x 17.6x 15.0x
EV/EBIT 24.6x 24.1x 17.7x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 4.4x 3.8x
EV/FCF 74.7x 28.4x 20.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 49.9x 25.7x 18.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 17.37 2.61 0.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLSIRMSA
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.2% 7.8% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.8% 7.2% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 5.6% 8.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.2% 9.5% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.1% 28.9% 10.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 13.7% 34.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.5% 82.8% 13.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 10.9% 186.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -42.3% 87.6% 15.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 12.4% 188.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -67.3% -5.8% 26.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 9.5% 96.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.6% -6.1% 40.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 9.6% 72.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLSIRMSA
Gross margin 34.2% 42.8% 47.6%
EBITDA margin 12.3% 24.8% 25.1%
Operating margin 10.0% 18.1% 21.2%
Pretax margin 7.6% 15.2% 21.1%
Net margin 5.4% 12.1% 16.1%
FCF margin 3.3% 15.4% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin 4.9% 17.0% 20.9%
Return on equity 11.6% 9.4% 22.8%
Return on assets 4.3% 5.3% 12.2%
Return on invested capital 8.1% 7.6% 15.9%
Return on capital employed 9.7% 9.2% 18.0%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.4x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.7% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLSIRMSA
Debt / assets 32.4% 26.2% 23.1%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.5x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.8x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 13.4x 3.9x 1.7x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 43.7% 46.1%
Equity / assets 37.6% 56.3% 53.9%
Interest coverage 5.1x 5.6x 12.7x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.6x 3.2x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.4x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 3.82 3.41 5.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLSIRMSA
Dividend yield 1.1% 0.1% 1.2%
Net buyback yield 1.3% 2.7% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 2.4% 2.8% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 3.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 2.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -2.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLSIRMSA
Forward P/E 18.5xFY2026 23.9xFY2026 19.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.34FY2026 $3.35FY2026 $9.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.2%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.0% +21.5% +3.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.72BFY2026 $8.35BFY2026 $1.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +9.2%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.3% +6.4% +19.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLSIRMSA
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 91.0%
Institutions holding 585 895 457
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.6% -1.5% +3.0%
Institutions buying 299 368 236
Institutions selling 202 360 147
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.02 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLSIRMSA
FLS 1.00 0.51 0.43
IR 0.51 1.00 0.57
MSA 0.43 0.57 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLS, IR and MSA?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flowserve (FLS) $10.17B, Ingersoll Rand (IR) $31.01B, MSA Safety (MSA) $6.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLS, IR and MSA?

MSA Safety (MSA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flowserve (FLS) 40.0x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 32.5x, MSA Safety (MSA) 22.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Flowserve (FLS) is cheapest (Flowserve (FLS) 18.5x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 23.9x, MSA Safety (MSA) 19.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flowserve (FLS) +0.2%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +7.8%, MSA Safety (MSA) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

MSA Safety (MSA) has the highest net margin (Flowserve (FLS) 5.4%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 12.1%, MSA Safety (MSA) 16.1%). On return on invested capital, MSA Safety (MSA) leads (Flowserve (FLS) 8.1%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 7.6%, MSA Safety (MSA) 15.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Flowserve (FLS) returned the most: Flowserve (FLS) +16.3%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +0.3%, MSA Safety (MSA) +5.7%. Over five years, Flowserve (FLS) compounded fastest (Flowserve (FLS) +19.0%/yr, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.3%/yr, MSA Safety (MSA) +3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

MSA Safety (MSA) has the highest dividend yield: Flowserve (FLS) 1.09%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 0.10%, MSA Safety (MSA) 1.19%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MSA Safety (MSA) has been the steadiest (Flowserve (FLS) 42.1%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 33.5%, MSA Safety (MSA) 25.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLS, IR and MSA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, MSA Safety (MSA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.