FLS vs EMR Stock Comparison

Flowserve and Emerson Electric Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLS Flowserve Corp
$68.20 -11.7% 1M +29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$8.87B
P/E
23.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.63B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
5 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$161.60 +4.6% 1M +21.3% 1Y
Market cap
$90.47B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Emerson Electric leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Emerson Electric 6, Flowserve 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLSEMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.87B $90.47B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.9x 35.1x FLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.7x 24.0x FLS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.3% +4.8% EMR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% 13.8% EMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% 10.9% EMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 1.8x EMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.5% +21.3% FLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.9%/yr +10.8%/yr FLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.8% 31.7% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 45/100 FLS

Percentile Scorecard

FLSEMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLSEMR
Valuation 50 #102 of 203 35 #133 of 203
Growth 69 #59 of 188 40 #113 of 188
Profitability 54 #86 of 187 85 #29 of 187
Financial Health 33 #150 of 222 29 #158 of 222
Shareholder Returns 86 #23 of 153 36 #99 of 153
Overall 58 45
  • FLS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLSEMRSPY
1 month -11.7%+4.6% -1.0%
3 months -5.8%+9.2% +2.9%
6 months -18.0%+14.3% +6.4%
Year to date -1.7%+21.8% +11.4%
1 year +29.5%+21.3% +13.1%
3 years +86.7%+78.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +23.2%+21.2% +21.5%
5 years +83.1%+67.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +12.9%+10.8% +10.9%
10 years +56.4%+222.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year +4.6%+12.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFLSEMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.8%31.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.9%33.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.741.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.600.67 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.9%-1.7% -2.5%
52-week high $92.04$164.37 $779.14
52-week low $52.66$123.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLSEMR
P/E now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 25.9x 35.0xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 4.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.7xmedian 13.7x 16.4xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.1xmedian 21.1x 26.0xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 2.3x 4.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.37median 1.19 -0.84median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLSEMR
Revenue $4.63B $18.64B
Gross profit $1.57B $9.91B
Operating income $392.30M $4.68B
Net income $390.08M $2.58B
Free cash flow $411.44M $3.46B
EPS (diluted) $2.89 $4.59
Cash & equivalents $731.01M $2.18B
Total debt $2.14B $54.11B
Shares (diluted) 128.36M 561.10M
Enterprise value $5.75B $83.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLSEMR
P/E 23.4x 35.0x
P/FCF 21.1x 26.0x
P/Operating cash flow 17.8x 23.0x
P/S 1.9x 4.8x
P/B 3.7x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 7.7x
EV/EBITDA 20.7x 16.4x
EV/EBIT 25.7x 21.6x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 5.4x
EV/FCF 24.5x 29.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.6x 25.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.37 -0.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLSEMR
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.3% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 7.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.3% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.5% 9.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.5% 13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.0% -3.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.9% -42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.5% -2.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.1% -41.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.6% 4.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 81.4% 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.1% 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 348.1% 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLSEMR
Gross margin 33.9% 53.2%
EBITDA margin 10.5% 33.1%
Operating margin 8.5% 25.1%
Pretax margin 11.9% 17.6%
Net margin 8.0% 13.8%
FCF margin 8.9% 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin 10.5% 21.0%
Return on equity 16.9% 12.7%
Return on assets 6.5% 6.1%
Return on invested capital 6.6% 10.9%
Return on capital employed 8.6% 14.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLSEMR
Debt / assets 33.8% 31.1%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 5.2x 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 63.2% 51.7%
Equity / assets 36.8% 48.3%
Interest coverage 4.6x –
Current ratio 2.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.53 4.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLSEMR
Dividend yield 1.3% 1.4%
Net buyback yield 2.6% 1.0%
Shareholder yield 3.9% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 47.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLSEMR
Forward P/E 15.7xFY2026 24.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.35FY2026 $6.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.5%FY2026 +12.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.2% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.72BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.3% +15.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLSEMR
Held by institutions 100.0% 82.1%
Institutions holding 584 2,290
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.6% +0.9%
Institutions buying 299 1,080
Institutions selling 201 798
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLSEMR
FLS 1.00 0.52
EMR 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLS and EMR?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flowserve (FLS) $8.87B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $90.47B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLS and EMR?

Flowserve (FLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flowserve (FLS) 23.9x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Flowserve (FLS) is cheapest (Flowserve (FLS) 15.7x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Emerson Electric (EMR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flowserve (FLS) -0.3%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest net margin (Flowserve (FLS) 8.0%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads (Flowserve (FLS) 6.6%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Flowserve (FLS) returned the most: Flowserve (FLS) +29.5%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +21.3%. Over five years, Flowserve (FLS) compounded fastest (Flowserve (FLS) +12.9%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +10.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Flowserve (FLS) 0.00%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%. Flowserve (FLS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Flowserve (FLS) 48.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do FLS and EMR move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.52, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, FLS and EMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.